AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE (POLICE LIAISON ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY) REGULATIONS (AMENDMENT)
1982 NO. 367
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
The Australian Federal Police (Police Liaison Advisory Committee for the Australian Capital Territory) Regulations (Amendment) amends the Australian Federal Police (Police Liaison Advisory Committee for the Australian Capital Territory) Regulations (the Principal Regulations) by amending the definition of “judicial proceedings” in sub-regulation 3(3) consequent upon the coming into operation of the Complaints (Australian Federal Police) Act 1981 on 1 May 1982.
The Regulations amend regulation 3 of the Principal Regulations by omitting paragraph (3)(c) and substituting new paragraphs (3)(c) and (3)(ca).
Paragraph 3(c) reproduces the former paragraph 3(c) without reference to the Disciplinary Board and Appeal Board under the Australian Federal Police (Discipline) Regulations. Paragraph 3(ca) inserts reference to proceedings before the Federal Police Disciplinary Tribunal under the Complaints (Australian Federal Police) Act 1981. The amendment therefore substitutes reference to the Federal Police Disciplinary Tribunal for reference to the Disciplinary and Appeal Boards.
The new paragraphs have the effect that it is not a function of the Police Liaison Advisory Committee for the Australian Capital Territory to make any public statement in relation to a matter in respect of which proceedings are pending before the Commissioner under the Australian Federal Police (Discipline) Regulations or before the Federal Police Disciplinary Tribunal under the Complaints (Australian Federal Police) Act 1981.
Overview
The Australian Federal Police (Police Liaison Advisory Committee for the Australian Capital Territory) Regulations (Amendment) 1982 was enacted to amend the Australian Federal Police (Police Liaison Advisory Committee for the Australian Capital Territory) Regulations, addressing a specific gap in the regulatory framework concerning the definition of "judicial proceedings" in the context of police disciplinary matters. The problem it was introduced to address is the need to align the regulations with the new legislative environment created by the Complaints (Australian Federal Police) Act 1981, which established the Federal Police Disciplinary Tribunal to handle disciplinary proceedings. This amendment was made by the Australian Capital Territory legislature to ensure that the Police Liaison Advisory Committee for the Australian Capital Territory does not make public statements about matters pending before the relevant tribunal, thus maintaining the integrity and confidentiality of the disciplinary process. The policy objective of the amendment is to clarify the scope of the Police Liaison Advisory Committee's functions and to ensure that it operates within the new legal framework established by the Complaints (Australian Federal Police) Act 1981.
Scope and Application
The Australian Capital Territory Australian Federal Police (Police Liaison Advisory Committee for the Australian Capital Territory) Regulations (Amendment) provide adjustments to the existing regulations concerning the scope and application of the Police Liaison Advisory Committee for the Australian Capital Territory. These amendments primarily affect the definition of "judicial proceedings" to align with the implementation of the Complaints (Australian Federal Police) Act 1981, ensuring the committee's functions are clearly delineated in relation to new disciplinary procedures. The amendment to regulation 3(c) and the introduction of paragraph 3(ca) ensures the committee refrains from making public statements on matters pending before the Federal Police Disciplinary Tribunal. This regulation applies to the Police Liaison Advisory Committee for the Australian Capital Territory and its functions within the Australian Capital Territory, thereby affecting the conduct of the committee in relation to disciplinary matters of the Australian Federal Police. The amendment extends the application of the Act by aligning it with the new disciplinary framework established by the Complaints (Australian Federal Police) Act 1981, and it does not introduce any stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds.
Key Provisions
The Australian Capital Territory Australian Federal Police (Police Liaison Advisory Committee for the Australian Capital Territory) Regulations (Amendment) 1982 primarily modify the definition of "judicial proceedings" in sub-regulation 3(3) of the existing Australian Federal Police (Police Liaison Advisory Committee for the Australian Capital Territory) Regulations. These amendments come into effect following the implementation of the Complaints (Australian Federal Police) Act 1981, which took effect on 1 May 1982. The key change is the substitution of references to the Disciplinary Board and Appeal Board under the Australian Federal Police (Discipline) Regulations with references to proceedings before the Federal Police Disciplinary Tribunal under the new Complaints Act.
The amendments to regulation 3 involve omitting the former paragraph 3(c) and inserting new paragraphs 3(c) and 3(ca). The new paragraph 3(c) replicates the former paragraph 3(c) but excludes references to the Disciplinary Board and Appeal Board, while paragraph 3(ca) specifically references proceedings before the Federal Police Disciplinary Tribunal. This shift effectively updates the definition to align with the new legislative framework, ensuring that the Police Liaison Advisory Committee does not make public statements about matters pending before either the Commissioner under the Australian Federal Police (Discipline) Regulations or the Federal Police Disciplinary Tribunal under the Complaints Act.
The Regulations impose certain obligations on the Police Liaison Advisory Committee for the Australian Capital Territory. One significant obligation is the prohibition against making any public statements regarding matters in which proceedings are pending before the Commissioner or the Federal Police Disciplinary Tribunal. This requirement ensures that the Committee maintains neutrality and avoids influencing the outcome of ongoing disciplinary or complaints proceedings. By adhering to this restriction, the Committee can effectively support the integrity of the judicial process and maintain public confidence in the fairness of the disciplinary mechanisms.
Failure to comply with the obligations set out in the Regulations may result in various consequences. Although specific penalties are not detailed within the text, breaches of such provisions could potentially lead to disciplinary actions against members of the Committee, or other administrative consequences as deemed appropriate by the relevant authorities. The primary focus of these Regulations is to ensure that the Police Liaison Advisory Committee operates within the bounds of the law and supports the disciplinary process without undue interference or public commentary that might prejudice the proceedings.