Australian Bicentennial Road Development Trust Fund Amendment Act 1984

Legislation au C2004A02899 Not in force Act

Legislation content

Australian Bicentennial Road Development Trust Fund Amendment Act 1984

No. 35 of 1984

 

An Act to amend the Australian Bicentennial Road Development Trust Fund Act 1982

[Assented to 8 June 1984]

BE IT ENACTED by the Queen, and the Senate and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:

Short title, &c.

1. (1) This Act may be cited as the Australian Bicentennial Road Development Trust Fund Amendment Act 1984.

(2) The Australian Bicentennial Road Development Trust Fund Act 19821 is in this Act referred to as the Principal Act.

Commencement

2. This Act shall come into operation on the day on which it receives the Royal Assent.


Variation of percentages where State fails to maintain expenditure on roads

3. Section 12 of the Principal Act is amended—

(a) by omitting sub-section (1 ) and substituting the following sub-sections:

(1) In this section—

deficit year, in relation to a State, means a year in respect of which the Minister gave, or could have given, a notice to the appropriate Minister of the State under sub-section (2);

relevant expenditure, in relation to a State, means expenditure by the State and government authorities of the State, other than local government bodies, in respect of roads (including expenditure by the State or such government authorities by way of making payments to local government bodies in respect of roads) out of funds obtained otherwise than by virtue of—

(a) this Act;

(b) any other Act providing for a grant to the State of moneys for expenditure only in relation to roads; or

(c) the Community Employment Act 1983.

(1a) If the Minister becomes satisfied that, during a financial year in the period commencing on 1 July 1982 and ending on 30 June 1988, the relevant expenditure of a State (including expenditure that is deemed to be relevant expenditure in the year by virtue of the operation of sub-section (1b)) was greater than it would have been if it had been maintained in real terms, the Minister shall give to the appropriate Minister of the State notice in writing stating that he has become so satisfied and specifying the amount by which he is satisfied that the relevant expenditure of the State during that year was greater than it would have been if it had been maintained in real terms.

(1b) Where the Minister has given to a Minister of a State notice under sub-section (1a) in relation to a financial year, the relevant expenditure of the State in the immediately following financial year shall be deemed to be increased by—

(a) where the financial year immediately preceding the year to which the notice under sub-section (1a) relates is not a deficit year for that State, an amount equal to the amount specified in the notice; or

(b) where the financial year immediately preceding the year to which the notice under sub-section (1a) relates is a deficit year for that State, the amount (if any) by which the amount specified in the notice exceeds the amount that would have been required to maintain the relevant expenditure of the State in real terms in the period comprising the year to which the notice relates and the immediately preceding year.; and

(b) by inserting in sub-section (2) (including expenditure that is deemed to be relevant expenditure in the year by virtue of the operation of sub-section (1b)) after State (first occurring).


Repeal of section 13

4. Section 13 of the Principal Act is repealed.

Additional conditions with respect to approved projects

5. Section 23 of the Principal Act is amended—

(a) by inserting in paragraph (a) a before bicentennial;

(b) by omitting from paragraph (a) works by way of;

(c) by omitting from paragraph (a) those works and substituting particular works involved in the activities referred to in sub-paragraph (i) or (ii), other than exempt works of the State,; and

(d) by adding at the end thereof the following sub-section:

(2) In this section, exempt works, in relation to a State, means works that the State has satisfied the Minister are works the whole of which—

(a) are urgently required by reason of an emergency;

(b) are of such a minor nature that the invitation of tenders for those works would involve undue additional cost;

(c) are of a kind for which it is not practicable to prepare adequate tender specifications; or

(d) are of a kind for which competitive tenders are unlikely to be received..

 

NOTE

1. No. 133, 1982.

Overview

The Australian Bicentennial Road Development Trust Fund Amendment Act 1984, enacted by the Queen and the Australian Parliament, serves to amend the Australian Bicentennial Road Development Trust Fund Act 1982. The primary objective of this amendment was to address issues arising from variations in state expenditure on roads, particularly ensuring that states maintain their spending levels in real terms and to establish additional conditions for approved projects. The Act was designed to provide flexibility and additional criteria for the fund's administration, ensuring that the intended benefits of the bicentennial road development initiative were effectively realised. By modifying certain provisions and introducing new conditions, the Act aimed to enhance the efficiency and oversight of the fund, thereby supporting the broader policy goal of improving road infrastructure across Australia.

Scope and Application

The Australian Bicentennial Road Development Trust Fund Amendment Act 1984 amends the Australian Bicentennial Road Development Trust Fund Act 1982, extending its application to address variations in road development expenditures by states and introducing additional conditions for approved projects. This Act applies to the states of Australia, specifically targeting their expenditure on road developments, and mandates the Minister to monitor and adjust allocations based on the state's actual spending compared to what would have been maintained in real terms. The geographic reach of this Act is national, affecting all states within the Commonwealth of Australia. The Act does not explicitly state exclusions or thresholds but implies that certain expenditures, particularly those involving urgent emergencies, minor works, and impractical tender processes, may be exempt from its purview. Additionally, the Act allows for the extension or restriction of its application through subordinate instruments, such as regulations or notices, issued by the Minister under the authority granted within the Act.

Key Provisions

The Australian Bicentennial Road Development Trust Fund Amendment Act 1984 (Act) amends the Australian Bicentennial Road Development Trust Fund Act 1982 (Principal Act). The Act comes into operation on the day it receives Royal Assent (s. 2). It modifies the definition of 'relevant expenditure' to include expenditure by the State and government authorities, excluding local government bodies, in respect of roads, excluding funds obtained through the Act, other road-related grant Acts, or the Community Employment Act 1983 (s. 3(a)). The Minister must notify a State if its relevant expenditure exceeds what it would have been if maintained in real terms, and this expenditure is deemed to increase in the following financial year (s. 3(1a) and (1b)). The Act repeals section 13 of the Principal Act (s. 4). It also amends section 23 of the Principal Act to include additional conditions for approved projects, such as ensuring that works are not exempt and to include works involved in specific activities (s. 5(a)-(c)). 'Exempt works' are defined as those that are urgently required due to an emergency, of a minor nature, not practicable to prepare adequate tender specifications for, or unlikely to receive competitive tenders (s. 5(2)). The Act imposes obligations on the Minister to notify the relevant State Minister if relevant expenditure exceeds the real terms maintenance level (s. 3(1a)). The State must then adjust its expenditure in the following financial year as specified (s. 3(1b)). Additionally, the Minister must ensure that approved projects comply with the conditions set out in section 23, particularly that the works involved are not exempt (s. 5). The State is required to maintain relevant expenditure in real terms and prepare adequate tender specifications where possible. The Act does not explicitly state any offences or penalties for breaches. However, failure to comply with the requirements for relevant expenditure adjustments and approved project conditions could potentially lead to disputes or legal actions under the broader framework of the Principal Act or other related legislation. It is important to note that while the Act itself does not detail specific penalties, breaches of related Acts, such as the Principal Act, could result in civil or criminal consequences as prescribed by those Acts. Overall, the Act aims to ensure that States maintain their road expenditure in real terms and that approved projects meet certain criteria, thereby supporting the objectives of the Australian Bicentennial Road Development Trust Fund.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Finance & Banking Law
Instrument
Amending Act
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Repeal & Amendment
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.