Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code - Standard 1.4.2 - Maximum Residue Limits Amendment Instrument No. APVMA 3, 2013

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2013L01209 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

 

Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—

Standard 1.4.2—Maximum Residue Limits

Amendment Instrument No. APVMA 3, 2013

 

 

Subsection 82(1) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 provides that the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) may vary Schedule 1 of the Maximum Residue Limits Standard to include or change a permitted maximum residue limit.  The Maximum Residue Limits Standard in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (Food Standards Code) is Standard 1.4.2 — Maximum Residue Limits. 

Standard 1.4.2 is the Principal Instrument being amended by this Amendment Instrument.  It has existed in various forms since before the Food Standards Code was first published in 1997. 

Section 82 was part of amendments to the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act), which were proclaimed to commence on 1 March 2011, that implemented a 2008 reform agreed to by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) calling for the recognition by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) of the APVMA’s residue risk assessment and the promulgation of the resulting MRLs in the Food Standards Code, for domestically grown produce.  The reform was designed to streamline current regulatory processes and to eliminate duplication by allowing the APVMA to directly vary Standard 1.4.2. 

The APVMA is an independent statutory authority of the Commonwealth.  Amongst other things, the APVMA is responsible for ensuring agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals used in Australia are not harmful to public health due to residues in food. 

Subsection 11(1) of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992 provides that the APVMA may, by writing under its common seal, delegate to a member of the staff of the APVMA all or any of its powers.  By written instrument under the seal of the APVMA of 7 June 2011, the APVMA has delegated to the holder of the office of Program Manager, Pesticides Program its powers under subsection 82(1) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991.

The Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of New Zealand concerning a Joint Food Standards System excludes MRLs for residues of agvet chemicals in food from the system setting joint food standards. Australia and New Zealand independently and separately develop MRLs for agvet chemicals in food. 

Assessment and Determination of MRLs

MRLs are regulatory standards which help to monitor that the agvet chemical product has been used in accordance with the approved label instructions.  If an MRL is exceeded, it usually indicates a misuse of the chemical but does not normally indicate a public health or safety concern.

In evaluating the safety and performance of agvet chemicals, the APVMA’s assessment also includes a determination of an MRL for the chemical in relation to relevant crops and animals.  The APVMA uses data from a series of residue trials and calculates whether the application of the minimum amount of chemical that is required to achieve effective pest or disease control will leave any residue in the plant or animal commodity.  In order to legitimise the presence of these residues, MRLs are established by the APVMA by entry into the APVMA’s MRL Standard (available at www.apvma.gov.au/residues/standard.php).

If there are small amounts of chemical residue in produce, the APVMA uses the toxicological evaluation and the dietary exposure assessment to examine the potential occurrence of adverse effects on human health when the produce is consumed. 

Dietary exposure assessments undertaken by the APVMA as part of the registration of the relevant chemical products indicate that the MRL variations being made by the Amendment Instrument do not present any public health and safety concerns.

Schedule 1 of Standard 1.4.2 lists the maximum level of the residues of an agvet chemical that may occur in foods.  Including limits for residues of agvet chemicals in foods in the Food Standards Code has the effect of allowing the sale of food containing legitimate residues, where any residues do not exceed these limits.  Variations in MRLs reflect the changing use patterns of agvet chemicals available to chemical users including food producers.  These changes include both the development of new products and crop uses, and the withdrawal of older products following review by the APVMA. 

Regulatory Impact Assessment

The proposed changes to regulation are minor and machinery in nature involving necessary technical variations to the Food Standards Code.  In November 2010, the Office of Best Practice Regulation provided a standing exemption from the need to assess if a Regulatory Impact Statement is required for applications relating to variations to MRLs.

The proposed MRL amendments are an essential consequence of the decision by the APVMA to register agvet chemical products (or to vary and extend their approved label instructions); or to issue a permit in relation to an agvet chemical product; or an outcome of a review decision by the APVMA to withdraw or restrict older agvet chemical products.  The setting of an MRL and its incorporation in the Food Standards Code is a science-based outcome arising from these decisions and for which there is only very limited discretion on the part of the APVMA decision maker. 

The proposal to vary MRLs in the Food Standards Code is likely to have negligible impacts on business, individuals, regulatory agencies or the economy.  Primary producers understand the need to use only registered agvet chemical products and to use those products strictly in accordance with approved label instructions.  In doing so, produce grown will be within the MRL set by the APVMA and, with the incorporation of those MRLs into the Food Standards Code by this Amendment Instrument, the sale of the produce containing residues that do not exceed the MRL will be lawful.  To this extent, the incorporation of APVMA approved MRLs into Schedule 1 of Standard 1.4.2 of the Food Standards Code benefits rather than burdens primary producers and consumers.

Consultations

The APVMA seeks the wider community’s involvement through public consultation as part of its evaluation process for the registration of new agvet chemical products or a major extension of the use of existing products to new crops and target animals.  During this consultation phase any person may comment or raise concerns about any relevant aspect of the intended registration, sale and use of the chemical product, including proposed MRLs and the dietary exposure assessment.  The APVMA addressed any concerns that were raised at the time as part of the registration and approval process. 

More specifically, by way of notice in the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Gazette (No. APVMA 8) on 23 April 2013 the APVMA notified that it was proposing to incorporate these variations to MRLs into Standard 1.4.2 and it invited public comment on the proposals.  The APVMA did not receive any comments during this stage of the consultations.

FSANZ also made Sanitary and Phytosanitary notification to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in relation to the variations to MRLs in Standard 1.4.2 and no comment was received in response to that notice.

Variations to MRLs are Legislative Instruments

Pursuant to subsection 82(2) of the FSANZ Act, the variations to MRLs made by the Amendment Instrument is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, but it is neither subject to the disallowance nor sunsetting provisions. 


NOTES ON ITEMS

 

Item 1 Name of Instrument

1. This item states that the full name of the Amendment Instrument is the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code — Standard 1.4.2 — Maximum Residue Limits Amendment Instrument No. APVMA 3, 2013.

Item 2 Commencement

2. Subsection 82(8) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 has the effect that, despite the provisions in the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, a legislative instrument made by the APVMA varying Standard 1.4.2 commences on the day a copy of the variation is published in the Gazette.

3. A Note to the item records that a copy of the variations made by the Amendment Instrument was published in Gazette No. APVMA 13 of 2 July 2013.

Item 3 Object

4. This item provides that the object of this Amendment Instrument is for the APVMA to vary Schedule 1 of Standard 1.4.2 of the Food Standards Code to include or change MRLs pertaining to agricultural and veterinary chemical products.

Item 4 Interpretation

5. This item defines the APVMA and the Principal Instrument.

6. The APVMA is the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority established by section 6 of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992.

7. The Principal Instrument is Standard 1.4.2 — Maximum Residue Limits of the Australia New Zealand Food Standard Code as defined in Section 4 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 being the code published in Gazette
No. P 27 on 27 August 1987 together with any amendments of the standards in that code. 

8. The definition of Principal Instrument also notes that the whole of the Australia New Zealand Food Standard Code (including Standard 1.4.2) was further published in Gazette P 30 of 20 December 2000.  This was specifically included as the amendment history at the beginning of the Food Standards Code dates only from that time.

Item 5 Variations to Standard 1.4.2

9. This item provides that the Schedule to this Amendment Instrument sets out the variations to Standard 1.4.2 – Maximum Residue Limits of the Food Standards Code.

10. The variations to MRLs made by the Amendment Instrument include variations made by the APVMA to the MRL Standard for April 2013 comprising amendments numbered (Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Instrument No. 4 (MRL Standard) Amendment Instrument 2013 (No. 1)) inclusive.


11. The chemical Metalayl was introduced in error by the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code — Standard 1.4.2 Maximum Residue Limits Amendment Instrument No. APVMA 12, 2012. The intent was to establish a cereal grains MRL of *0.01 for Metalaxyl.  Metalayl and its cereal grains MRL are omitted by Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code — Standard 1.4.2 — Maximum Residue Limits Amendment Instrument No. APVMA 3, 2013, and a cereal grains MRL of *0.01 for Metalaxyl has been established as was the original intent.

 

 

 

By Authority:

Program Manager, Pesticides Program

Delegate of the APVMA

26 June 2013


STATEMENT OF COMPATIBILITY FOR A LEGISLATIVE INSTRUMENTTHAT DOES NOT RAISE ANY HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—Standard 1.4.2—Maximum Residue Limits Amendment Instrument No. APVMA 3, 2013 was enacted to address the need for updating the maximum residue limits (MRLs) for agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals in food, as established under the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991. This legislative instrument was introduced by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), an independent statutory authority of the Commonwealth responsible for ensuring the safety of agvet chemicals used in Australia. The APVMA's role includes determining MRLs for these chemicals to ensure that any residues in food do not pose a public health risk. The policy objective of this amendment is to streamline regulatory processes and eliminate duplication by allowing the APVMA to directly vary the MRLs in the Food Standards Code, thereby facilitating the lawful sale of food containing legitimate chemical residues that do not exceed the established limits. This amendment reflects changes in the use patterns of agvet chemicals, including the registration of new products, extension of existing products to new crops and animals, and the withdrawal of older products following review. The APVMA evaluates the safety and performance of these chemicals, conducts toxicological assessments, and determines MRLs based on residue trials. The changes proposed by this Amendment Instrument are minor and are a direct consequence of the APVMA's regulatory decisions regarding agvet chemical products. Public consultation was undertaken during the registration process, and no concerns were raised regarding the proposed MRL variations. The variations to the MRLs are intended to have negligible impacts on businesses, individuals, regulatory agencies, and the economy, ultimately benefiting primary producers and consumers by ensuring that food containing residues within the set limits can be legally sold.

Scope and Application

The Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—Standard 1.4.2—Maximum Residue Limits Amendment Instrument No. APVMA 3, 2013 applies to the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), which is an independent statutory authority of the Commonwealth responsible for ensuring that agricultural and veterinary chemicals used in Australia are not harmful to public health due to residues in food. The amendment instrument varies Schedule 1 of Standard 1.4.2 of the Food Standards Code to include or change maximum residue limits (MRLs) pertaining to agricultural and veterinary chemical products. The changes primarily concern the regulation of MRLs for residues of chemicals in food, which are established to ensure compliance with approved label instructions and to protect public health. The amendment instrument has a national reach, applying across all states and territories of Australia. Notably, the Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of New Zealand concerning a Joint Food Standards System excludes MRLs for residues of agricultural and veterinary chemicals in food from the joint system, meaning that Australia and New Zealand independently set their own MRLs. The APVMA's assessment of these chemicals includes a determination of MRLs, which are incorporated into the Food Standards Code to legitimise the sale of food containing legitimate residues that do not exceed the set limits. This amendment instrument reflects the APVMA's decisions on chemical product registration, extension of use, or review outcomes and is essential for aligning MRLs with current use patterns and safety assessments.

Key Provisions

The Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—Standard 1.4.2—Maximum Residue Limits Amendment Instrument No. APVMA 3, 2013 (the Amendment Instrument) primarily varies Schedule 1 of Standard 1.4.2 in the Food Standards Code to include or change the maximum residue limits (MRLs) for agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals in foods. This amendment is mandated by subsection 82(1) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act), which allows the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) to make such changes. The APVMA, an independent statutory authority responsible for ensuring that agvet chemicals used in Australia do not harm public health through residues in food, has the power to delegate these functions to a Program Manager within the APVMA. This Amendment Instrument includes variations for MRLs of various agvet chemicals, reflecting the APVMA’s assessment and determination process. The APVMA, as the governing body, imposes several obligations on entities it regulates. These obligations include ensuring that any agvet chemical products registered for use in Australia adhere to the approved label instructions and that any residues in food products do not exceed the established MRLs. This involves conducting rigorous residue trials and toxicological evaluations to determine safe MRLs, and subsequently publishing these limits in the APVMA’s MRL Standard. Furthermore, the APVMA is obligated to consult with the public during the evaluation process for new agvet chemical products or significant changes to existing products, allowing for public comment on proposed MRLs and dietary exposure assessments. Breaches of the provisions set forth in the Amendment Instrument can lead to significant consequences. While the Amendment Instrument itself does not explicitly outline specific penalties for non-compliance, violations of MRLs can result in regulatory action under other applicable laws, such as the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code. Non-compliance with established MRLs may lead to the prohibition of sale of food products containing residues exceeding the limits, which can have severe economic repercussions for producers. Additionally, the APVMA may take enforcement actions against entities found to be in breach of the MRL standards, potentially including fines or other penalties as stipulated in relevant legislation. In summary, the Amendment Instrument modifies the MRLs for agvet chemicals in food products to ensure that any residues present do not pose a public health risk. The APVMA is responsible for overseeing compliance with these standards and has the authority to impose measures against non-compliance. The regulatory impact of these changes is considered minor, as the variations reflect necessary adjustments based on the APVMA's scientific assessments and regulatory decisions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Environmental Law
Food Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.