Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code — Schedule 20 – Maximum residue limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 9, 2017

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2017L01129 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

 

Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—

Schedule 20—Maximum Residue Limits

Variation Instrument No. APVMA 9, 2017

 

 

Subsection 82(1) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 provides that the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) may vary the Maximum Residue Limits Standard to include or change a permitted maximum residue limit.  The Maximum Residue Limits Standard in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (Food Standards Code) is Schedule 20 — Maximum Residue Limits. 

Schedule 20 is the Principal Instrument being amended by this Amendment Instrument.  It has existed in various forms since before the Food Standards Code was first published in 1997. 

Section 82 was part of amendments to the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act), which were proclaimed to commence on 1 March 2011, that implemented a 2008 reform agreed to by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) calling for the recognition by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) of the APVMA’s residue risk assessment and the promulgation of the resulting MRLs in the Food Standards Code, for domestically grown produce.  The reform was designed to streamline current regulatory processes and to eliminate duplication by allowing the APVMA to directly vary Schedule 20. 

The APVMA is an independent statutory authority of the Commonwealth.  Amongst other things, the APVMA is responsible for ensuring agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals used in Australia are not harmful to public health due to residues in food. 

The Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of New Zealand concerning a Joint Food Standards System excludes MRLs for residues of agvet chemicals in food from the system setting joint food standards. Australia and New Zealand independently and separately develop MRLs for agvet chemicals in food. 

Assessment and Determination of MRLs

MRLs are regulatory standards which help to monitor that the agvet chemical product has been used in accordance with the approved label instructions.  If an MRL is exceeded, it usually indicates a misuse of the chemical but does not normally indicate a public health or safety concern.

In evaluating the safety and performance of agvet chemicals, the APVMA’s assessment also includes a determination of an MRL for the chemical in relation to relevant crops and animals.  The APVMA uses data from a series of residue trials and calculates whether the application of the minimum amount of chemical that is required to achieve effective pest or disease control will leave any residue in the plant or animal commodity.  In order to legitimise the presence of these residues, MRLs are established by the APVMA by entry into the APVMA’s MRL Standard (available at http://www.comlaw.gov.au).

If there are small amounts of chemical residue in produce, the APVMA uses the toxicological evaluation and the dietary exposure assessment to examine the potential occurrence of adverse effects on human health when the produce is consumed. 

Dietary exposure assessments undertaken by the APVMA as part of the registration of the relevant chemical products indicate that the MRL variations being made by the Amendment Instrument do not present any public health and safety concerns.

Schedule 20 of lists the maximum level of the residues of an agvet chemical that may occur in foods.  Including limits for residues of agvet chemicals in foods in the Food Standards Code has the effect of allowing the sale of food containing legitimate residues, where any residues do not exceed these limits.  Variations in MRLs reflect the changing use patterns of agvet chemicals available to chemical users including food producers.  These changes include both the development of new products and crop uses, and the withdrawal of older products following review by the APVMA. 

Regulatory Impact Assessment

The proposed changes to regulation are minor and machinery in nature involving necessary technical variations to the Food Standards Code.  In November 2010, the Office of Best Practice Regulation provided a standing exemption from the need to assess if a Regulatory Impact Statement is required for applications relating to variations to MRLs.

The proposed MRL amendments are an essential consequence of the decision by the APVMA to register agvet chemical products (or to vary and extend their approved label instructions); or to issue a permit in relation to an agvet chemical product; or an outcome of a review decision by the APVMA to withdraw or restrict older agvet chemical products.  The setting of an MRL and its incorporation in the Food Standards Code is a science-based outcome arising from these decisions and for which there is only very limited discretion on the part of the APVMA decision maker. 

The proposal to vary MRLs in the Food Standards Code is likely to have negligible impacts on business, individuals, regulatory agencies or the economy.  Primary producers understand the need to use only registered agvet chemical products and to use those products strictly in accordance with approved label instructions.  In doing so, produce grown will be within the MRL set by the APVMA and, with the incorporation of those MRLs into the Food Standards Code by this Amendment Instrument, the sale of the produce containing residues that do not exceed the MRL will be lawful.  To this extent, the incorporation of APVMA approved MRLs into Schedule 20   of the Food Standards Code benefits rather than burdens primary producers and consumers.

Consultations

The APVMA seeks the wider community’s involvement through public consultation as part of its evaluation process for the registration of new agvet chemical products or a major extension of the use of existing products to new crops and target animals.  During this consultation phase any person may comment or raise concerns about any relevant aspect of the intended registration, sale and use of the chemical product, including proposed MRLs and the dietary exposure assessment.  The APVMA addressed any concerns that were raised at the time as part of the registration and approval process. 

More specifically, by way of notice in the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Gazette (No. APVMA 18) on 5 September 2017 the APVMA notified that it was proposing to incorporate these variations to MRLs into Schedule 20 and it invited public comment on the proposals. The APVMA did not receive any comments during this stage of the consultations.

FSANZ also made Sanitary and Phytosanitary notification to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in relation to the variations to MRLs in Schedule 20 and no comment was received in response to that notice.

Variations to MRLs are Legislative Instruments

Pursuant to subsection 82(2) of the FSANZ Act, the variations to MRLs made by the Amendment Instrument is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the
Legislation Act 2003, but it is neither subject to the disallowance nor sunsetting provisions. 


NOTES ON ITEMS

Item 1 Name of Instrument

1. This item states that the full name of the Amendment Instrument is the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code — Schedule 20 — Maximum Residue Limits Amendment Instrument No. APVMA 9, 2017.

Item 2 Commencement

2. Subsection 82(8) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 has the effect that, despite the provisions in the Legislation Act 2003, a legislative instrument made by the APVMA varying Schedule 20 commences on the day a copy of the variation is published in the Gazette.

3. A Note to the item records that a copy of the variations made by the Amendment Instrument was published in Gazette No. APVMA 18 of 5 September 2017.

Item 3 Object

4. This item provides that the object of this Amendment Instrument is for the APVMA to vary Schedule 20 of the Food Standards Code to include or change MRLs pertaining to agricultural and veterinary chemical products.

Item 4 Interpretation

5. This item defines the APVMA and the Principal Instrument.

6. The APVMA is the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority established by section 6 of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992.

7. The Principal Instrument is Schedule 20 — Maximum Residue Limits of the Australia New Zealand Food Standard Code as defined in Section 4 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 being the code published in Gazette
No. P 27 on 27 August 1987 together with any amendments of the standards in that code. 

8. The definition of Principal Instrument also notes that Schedule 20 was published in the Food Standards Gazette FSC 96 on Thursday 10 April 2015 and was registered as a legislative instrument on 1 April 2015 F2015L00468.

Item 5 Variations to Schedule 20

9. This item provides that the Schedule to this Amendment Instrument sets out the variations to Schedule 20 – Maximum Residue Limits of the Food Standards Code.

10. The variations to MRLs made by the Amendment Instrument include variations made by the APVMA to the MRL Standard for June 2017 comprising amendments numbered (Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Instrument No. 4 (MRL Standard) Amendment Instrument 2016 (No. 6) inclusive.

By Authority:

Chief Executive Officer

Delegate of the APVMA

31 August 2017


STATEMENT OF COMPATIBILITY FOR A LEGISLATIVE INSTRUMENTTHAT DOES NOT RAISE ANY HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code — Schedule 20 — Maximum Residue Limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 9, 2017 was enacted to address the need for streamlining the regulatory processes concerning Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals in food. This legislation was introduced to facilitate the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority's (APVMA) direct variation of the MRLs in the Food Standards Code, as per the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991. The policy objective is to eliminate duplication and ensure that MRLs are set based on sound scientific assessments, thereby ensuring public health safety while allowing the lawful sale of food products that contain legitimate residues within the established limits. This reform recognises the APVMA's role in residue risk assessment and its authority to set MRLs, which are subsequently incorporated into the Food Standards Code. The enactment of this legislation by the APVMA, an independent statutory authority of the Commonwealth, underscores the importance of harmonising regulatory frameworks to efficiently manage MRLs for agvet chemicals. By varying these limits in response to the APVMA's assessments and decisions, the legislation ensures that any changes to the use patterns of agvet chemicals are reflected in the regulatory standards, thereby facilitating compliance by primary producers and safeguarding consumer health.

Scope and Application

The Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—Schedule 20—Maximum Residue Limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 9, 2017, applies to the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) which is responsible for ensuring agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals used in Australia are not harmful to public health due to residues in food. This Act regulates the maximum residue limits (MRLs) for agvet chemicals in food, which are established to ensure the safe use of these chemicals. The MRLs are set by the APVMA and incorporated into the Food Standards Code, which is a principal instrument that applies nationally across Australia. The Act allows the APVMA to vary MRLs as a result of their assessment of agvet chemicals, which can include the registration of new products, extension of use to new crops and target animals, or the withdrawal of older products following review. This Amendment Instrument is neither subject to disallowance nor sunsetting provisions. The variations to MRLs are legislative instruments that reflect changes in the use patterns of agvet chemicals available to chemical users, including food producers.

Key Provisions

The Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—Schedule 20—Maximum Residue Limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 9, 2017 (Amendment Instrument) is primarily concerned with the variations to the Maximum Residue Limits (MRL) pertaining to agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemical products as outlined in Schedule 20 of the Food Standards Code. Section 82(1) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 allows the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) to vary the MRLs included in Schedule 20. This means the APVMA has the authority to include or change the permitted maximum residue limits for agvet chemicals in foods. The variations made by the APVMA are based on scientific assessments and residue trials, ensuring that any residues in food do not pose a public health risk. The obligations imposed by the Amendment Instrument on the APVMA and other entities include conducting thorough assessments of the safety and performance of agvet chemicals, determining appropriate MRLs, and ensuring that these MRLs are incorporated into the Food Standards Code. The APVMA is responsible for ensuring that residues of agvet chemicals in food do not exceed the established MRLs, thus protecting public health. Additionally, the Amendment Instrument requires the APVMA to engage in public consultations during the evaluation process for new agvet chemical products or significant extensions of existing products to new crops and target animals. This ensures that all relevant concerns and comments are addressed before any MRL variations are made. In terms of consequences for breach, the Amendment Instrument does not explicitly state civil or criminal penalties for non-compliance with the MRLs. However, it is implied that exceeding the MRLs could result in regulatory action, as the MRLs are designed to prevent harmful residues in food. While the Amendment Instrument itself does not impose penalties, any breaches of the MRLs or non-compliance with the Food Standards Code could lead to actions under other relevant legislation, such as the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code, where penalties for non-compliance may be specified. The regulatory impact assessment indicates that the changes are likely to have negligible impacts, suggesting that the primary focus is on maintaining food safety standards rather than punitive measures.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Food Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers
Catchwords
Maximum Residue Limits

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.