Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code — Schedule 20 – Maximum residue limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 4, 2022

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2022L01102 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

 

Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—

Schedule 20—Maximum Residue Limits

Variation Instrument No. APVMA 4, 2022

 

 

Subsection 82(1) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 provides that the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) may vary the Maximum Residue Limits Standard to include or change a permitted maximum residue limit.  The Maximum Residue Limits Standard in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (Food Standards Code) is Schedule 20 — Maximum Residue Limits. 

Schedule 20 is the Principal Instrument being amended by this Amendment Instrument.  It has existed in various forms since before the Food Standards Code was first published in 1997. 

Section 82 was part of amendments to the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act), which were proclaimed to commence on 1 March 2011, that implemented a 2008 reform agreed to by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) calling for the recognition by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) of the APVMA’s residue risk assessment and the promulgation of the resulting MRLs in the Food Standards Code, for domestically grown produce.  The reform was designed to streamline current regulatory processes and to eliminate duplication by allowing the APVMA to directly vary Schedule 20. 

The APVMA is an independent statutory authority of the Commonwealth.  Amongst other things, the APVMA is responsible for ensuring agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals used in Australia are not harmful to public health due to residues in food. 

The Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of New Zealand concerning a Joint Food Standards System excludes MRLs for residues of agvet chemicals in food from the system setting joint food standards. Australia and New Zealand independently and separately develop MRLs for agvet chemicals in food. 

Assessment and Determination of MRLs

MRLs are regulatory standards which help to monitor that the agvet chemical product has been used in accordance with the approved label instructions.  If an MRL is exceeded, it usually indicates a misuse of the chemical but does not normally indicate a public health or safety concern.

In evaluating the safety and performance of agvet chemicals, the APVMA’s assessment also includes a determination of an MRL for the chemical in relation to relevant crops and animals.  The APVMA uses data from a series of residue trials and calculates whether the application of the minimum amount of chemical that is required to achieve effective pest or disease control will leave any residue in the plant or animal commodity.  In order to legitimise the presence of these residues, MRLs are established by the APVMA by entry into the APVMA’s MRL Standard (available at http://www.comlaw.gov.au).

If there are small amounts of chemical residue in produce, the APVMA uses the toxicological evaluation and the dietary exposure assessment to examine the potential occurrence of adverse effects on human health when the produce is consumed. 

Dietary exposure assessments undertaken by the APVMA as part of the registration of the relevant chemical products indicate that the MRL variations being made by the Amendment Instrument do not present any public health and safety concerns.

Schedule 20 lists the maximum level of the residues of an agvet chemical that may occur in foods.  Including limits for residues of agvet chemicals in foods in the Food Standards Code has the effect of allowing the sale of food containing legitimate residues, where any residues do not exceed these limits.  Variations in MRLs reflect the changing use patterns of agvet chemicals available to chemical users including food producers.  These changes include both the development of new products and crop uses, and the withdrawal of older products following review by the APVMA. 

Regulatory Impact Assessment

The proposed changes to regulation are minor and machinery in nature involving necessary technical variations to the Food Standards Code.  In November 2010, the Office of Best Practice Regulation provided a standing exemption from the need to assess if a Regulatory Impact Statement is required for applications relating to variations to MRLs.

The proposed MRL amendments are an essential consequence of the decision by the APVMA to register agvet chemical products (or to vary and extend their approved label instructions); or to issue a permit in relation to an agvet chemical product; or an outcome of a review decision by the APVMA to withdraw or restrict older agvet chemical products.  The setting of an MRL and its incorporation in the Food Standards Code is a science-based outcome arising from these decisions and for which there is only very limited discretion on the part of the APVMA decision maker. 

The proposal to vary MRLs in the Food Standards Code is likely to have negligible impacts on business, individuals, regulatory agencies or the economy.  Primary producers understand the need to use only registered agvet chemical products and to use those products strictly in accordance with approved label instructions.  In doing so, produce grown will be within the MRL set by the APVMA and, with the incorporation of those MRLs into the Food Standards Code by this Amendment Instrument, the sale of the produce containing residues that do not exceed the MRL will be lawful.  To this extent, the incorporation of APVMA approved MRLs into Schedule 20   of the Food Standards Code benefits rather than burdens primary producers and consumers.

Consultations

The APVMA seeks the wider community’s involvement through public consultation as part of its evaluation process for the registration of new agvet chemical products or a major extension of the use of existing products to new crops and target animals.  During this consultation phase any person may comment or raise concerns about any relevant aspect of the intended registration, sale and use of the chemical product, including proposed MRLs and the dietary exposure assessment.  The APVMA addressed any concerns that were raised at the time as part of the registration and approval process. 

More specifically, by way of notice in the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Gazette (No. APVMA 10) on 17 May 2022 the APVMA notified that it was proposing to incorporate these variations to MRLs into Schedule 20 and it invited public comment on the proposals. The APVMA did not receive any comments during this stage of the consultations.

A Sanitary and Phytosanitary notification to the World Trade Organization (WTO) was also made in relation to the variations to MRLs in Schedule 20 and no comment was received in response to that notice.

Variations to MRLs are Legislative Instruments

Pursuant to subsection 82(2) of the FSANZ Act, the variations to MRLs made by the Amendment Instrument is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the
Legislation Act 2003, but it is neither subject to the disallowance nor sunsetting provisions.

The MRLs made by the Amendment Instrument will not be subject to the disallowance or sunsetting provisions of the Legislation Act 2003. Subsections 44(1) and 54(1) of the FSANZ Act provides that a legislative instrument is not disallowable or subject to sunsetting if the enabling legislation for the instrument (in this case, the FSANZ Act): (a) facilitates the establishment or operation of an intergovernmental scheme involving the Commonwealth and one or more States and (b) authorises the instrument to be made for the purposes of the scheme. Regulation 11 of the Legislation (Exemptions and other Matters) Regulation 2015 also exempts from sunsetting legislative instruments a primary purpose of which is to give effect to an international obligation of Australia.

The FSANZ Act gives effect to an intergovernmental agreement (the Food Regulation Agreement) and facilitates the establishment or operation of an intergovernmental scheme (national uniform food regulation). For these purposes, the Act establishes the Authority to develop food standards for consideration and endorsement by the Food Ministers Meeting (FMM). The FMM is established under the Food Regulation Agreement, and consists of Commonwealth and State/Territory members. If endorsed by the FMM, the food standards on gazettal and registration are incorporated into and become part of Commonwealth and State and Territory food laws. These standards or instruments are then administered, applied and enforced by these jurisdictions regulators as part of those food laws.


NOTES ON ITEMS

Item 1 Name of Instrument

1. This item states that the full name of the Amendment Instrument is the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code — Schedule 20 — Maximum Residue Limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 4, 2022 (Amendment Instrument).

Item 2 Commencement

2. Subsection 82(8) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 has the effect that, despite the provisions in the Legislation Act 2003, a legislative instrument made by the APVMA varying Schedule 20 commences on the day a copy of the variation is published in the Gazette.

3. A Note to the item records that a copy of the variations made by the Amendment Instrument was published in the Commonwealth of Australia Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Gazette.

Item 3 Object

4. This item provides that the object of this Amendment Instrument is for the APVMA to vary Schedule 20 of the Food Standards Code to include or change MRLs pertaining to agricultural and veterinary chemical products.

Item 4 Interpretation

5. This item defines the APVMA and the Principal Instrument.

6. The APVMA is the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority established by section 6 of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992.

7. The Principal Instrument is Schedule 20 — Maximum Residue Limits of the Australia New Zealand Food Standard Code as defined in Section 4 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 being the code published in Gazette
No. P 27 on 27 August 1987 together with any amendments of the standards in that code. 

8. The definition of Principal Instrument also notes that Schedule 20 was published in the Food Standards Gazette FSC 96 on Thursday 10 April 2015 and was registered as a legislative instrument on 1 April 2015 F2015L00468.

Item 5 Variations to Schedule 20

9. This item provides that the Schedule to this Amendment Instrument sets out the variations to Schedule 20 – Maximum Residue Limits of the Food Standards Code.

10. The variations to MRLs made by the Amendment Instrument include variations made by the APVMA to the MRL Standard for May 2022 comprising amendments numbered Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code (MRL Standard) Amendment Instrument (No. 3) 2022.

 

By Authority:

Delegate of the Chief Executive Officer

of the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority

18 August 2022


STATEMENT OF COMPATIBILITY FOR A LEGISLATIVE INSTRUMENTTHAT DOES NOT RAISE ANY HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code — Schedule 20 —

Maximum Residue Limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 4 2022

 

This Legislative Instrument made by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Requirement for a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

This Legislative Instrument made by the APVMA is not a disallowable instrument pursuant to section 82(2) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 and therefore the Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is not strictly required.  Nonetheless, to accord with the spirit of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011, the APVMA provides this Statement of Compatibility. 

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

This Legislative Instrument makes variations to Schedule 20 Maximum Residue Limits   of the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code to include or change maximum residue limits (MRLs) pertaining to agricultural and veterinary chemical products.  The variations made to Schedule 20 in this Amendment Instrument put into the Food Standards Code MRLs previously approved by the APVMA as part of the registration of the relevant chemical products.  The variations have the effect of allowing the sale of food containing residues within the approved maximum limits but do not present any public health or safety concerns.  The variations also do not affect the rights or freedoms of any humans.

Human rights implications

This Legislative Instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

 

Sheila Logan,

Executive Director, Risk Assessment Capability, APVMA

 

 

 

Overview

The Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—Schedule 20—Maximum Residue Limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 4, 2022, was introduced to address the need for streamlined regulatory processes and to eliminate duplication in the oversight of agricultural and veterinary chemical residues in food. Enacted by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) under the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991, this instrument allows the APVMA to directly vary the Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) Standard in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code. The policy objective is to ensure that the use of agricultural and veterinary chemicals in Australia does not harm public health due to residues in food, while also reflecting changing use patterns of these chemicals. The MRL variations incorporated in the Food Standards Code facilitate the lawful sale of food containing residues that do not exceed the approved limits, thereby benefiting primary producers and consumers without imposing additional burdens.

Scope and Application

The Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—Schedule 20—Maximum Residue Limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 4, 2022, is a legislative instrument made by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) under the authority granted by subsection 82(1) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991. This instrument applies to the regulation of maximum residue limits (MRLs) of agricultural and veterinary chemicals in food products, ensuring that any residues present in food do not exceed the established limits and thus do not pose public health risks. It operates on a Commonwealth level and is not subject to disallowance or sunsetting provisions. The instrument incorporates variations to Schedule 20 of the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code, which lists the maximum levels of chemical residues that can legally occur in food products. These variations reflect changes in the use patterns of agricultural and veterinary chemicals, including the registration of new products, the extension of use to new crops or animals, and the withdrawal of older products following review by the APVMA. The instrument is designed to streamline regulatory processes and eliminate duplication by allowing the APVMA to directly vary MRLs, which are then incorporated into the Food Standards Code. The variations do not extend to MRLs for New Zealand, as the Agreement between Australia and New Zealand concerning a Joint Food Standards System excludes such MRLs from the joint standards system.

Key Provisions

The main sections of the Amendment Instrument (APVMA 4, 2022) relate to the variation of maximum residue limits (MRLs) for agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code. Section 82(1) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act) authorises the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) to vary the MRLs in Schedule 20, which sets the maximum levels of chemical residues that may occur in foods. These variations aim to reflect changing patterns in the use of agvet chemicals and to ensure that the MRLs in the Food Standards Code align with those approved by the APVMA. The variations incorporate MRLs for residues of agvet chemicals in food, which have been evaluated by the APVMA to ensure they do not pose public health risks. The Amendment Instrument imposes several obligations on the APVMA and other parties involved. The APVMA must conduct a thorough assessment of the safety and performance of agvet chemicals, including determining appropriate MRLs. It must also undertake toxicological evaluations and dietary exposure assessments to ensure that residues in food do not exceed safe limits. The APVMA is responsible for ensuring that MRLs are science-based and reflect the safe use of agvet chemicals. Additionally, the APVMA must engage in public consultation when evaluating new agvet chemicals or major changes to existing products, allowing for public input on proposed MRLs. The Amendment Instrument does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches of the MRLs. However, the FSANZ Act provides mechanisms for enforcement of the Food Standards Code. Violations of the MRLs set out in Schedule 20 could result in legal actions under relevant food safety and regulatory laws, potentially leading to penalties for non-compliance. The APVMA has the authority to take regulatory action against entities that fail to comply with the MRLs, which could include fines, product recalls, or other enforcement measures. The precise penalties would depend on the specific circumstances of the breach and the applicable laws. The Amendment Instrument also addresses the regulatory impact of the MRL variations. It highlights that the changes are minor and technical in nature, and that the variations are a direct consequence of the APVMA’s assessment and decision-making processes regarding agvet chemicals. The APVMA has determined that the proposed MRL variations are unlikely to have significant impacts on businesses, individuals, or the economy, as primary producers are expected to use approved agvet chemicals in accordance with label instructions. The incorporation of APVMA-approved MRLs into Schedule 20 of the Food Standards Code is intended to benefit primary producers and consumers by ensuring the safe sale of food containing residues within the approved limits. Finally, the Amendment Instrument includes a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights, affirming that the legislative instrument does not engage any human rights issues. The APVMA has assessed that the variations to MRLs do not infringe upon any rights or freedoms recognised in international human rights instruments, and thus, the instrument is compatible with human rights. This statement underscores the APVMA’s commitment to ensuring that its regulatory actions align with human rights principles, even though it is not strictly required for this legislative instrument.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Food Law
Environmental Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Regulatory Standards
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.