Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code — Schedule 20 — Maximum residue limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 3, 2024

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2024L00946 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

 

Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—

Schedule 20—Maximum Residue Limits

Variation Instrument No. APVMA 3, 2024

 

 

Subsection 82(1) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 provides that the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) may vary the Maximum Residue Limits Standard to include or change a permitted maximum residue limit.  The Maximum Residue Limits Standard in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (Food Standards Code) is Schedule 20 — Maximum Residue Limits. 

Schedule 20 is the Principal Instrument being amended by this Amendment Instrument.  It has existed in various forms since before the Food Standards Code was first published in 1997. 

Section 82 was part of amendments to the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act), which were proclaimed to commence on 1 March 2011, that implemented a 2008 reform agreed to by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) calling for the recognition by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) of the APVMA’s residue risk assessment and the promulgation of the resulting MRLs in the Food Standards Code, for domestically grown produce.  The reform was designed to streamline current regulatory processes and to eliminate duplication by allowing the APVMA to directly vary Schedule 20. 

The APVMA is an independent statutory authority of the Commonwealth.  Amongst other things, the APVMA is responsible for ensuring agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals used in Australia are not harmful to public health due to residues in food. 

The Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of New Zealand concerning a Joint Food Standards System excludes MRLs for residues of agvet chemicals in food from the system setting joint food standards. Australia and New Zealand independently and separately develop MRLs for agvet chemicals in food. 

Assessment and Determination of MRLs

MRLs are regulatory standards which help to monitor that the agvet chemical product has been used in accordance with the approved label instructions.  If an MRL is exceeded, it usually indicates a misuse of the chemical but does not normally indicate a public health or safety concern.

In evaluating the safety and performance of agvet chemicals, the APVMA’s assessment also includes a determination of an MRL for the chemical in relation to relevant crops and animals.  The APVMA uses data from a series of residue trials and calculates whether the application of the minimum amount of chemical that is required to achieve effective pest or disease control will leave any residue in the plant or animal commodity.  In order to legitimise the presence of these residues, MRLs are established by the APVMA by entry into the APVMA’s MRL Standard (available at http://www.comlaw.gov.au).

If there are small amounts of chemical residue in produce, the APVMA uses the toxicological evaluation and the dietary exposure assessment to examine the potential occurrence of adverse effects on human health when the produce is consumed. 

Dietary exposure assessments undertaken by the APVMA as part of the registration of the relevant chemical products indicate that the MRL variations being made by the Amendment Instrument do not present any public health and safety concerns.

Schedule 20 lists the maximum level of the residues of an agvet chemical that may occur in foods.  Including limits for residues of agvet chemicals in foods in the Food Standards Code has the effect of allowing the sale of food containing legitimate residues, where any residues do not exceed these limits.  Variations in MRLs reflect the changing use patterns of agvet chemicals available to chemical users including food producers.  These changes include both the development of new products and crop uses, and the withdrawal of older products following review by the APVMA. 

Regulatory Impact Assessment

The proposed changes to regulation are minor and machinery in nature involving necessary technical variations to the Food Standards Code.  In November 2010, the Office of Best Practice Regulation provided a standing exemption from the need to assess if a Regulatory Impact Statement is required for applications relating to variations to MRLs.

The proposed MRL amendments are an essential consequence of the decision by the APVMA to register agvet chemical products (or to vary and extend their approved label instructions); or to issue a permit in relation to an agvet chemical product; or an outcome of a review decision by the APVMA to withdraw or restrict older agvet chemical products.  The setting of an MRL and its incorporation in the Food Standards Code is a science-based outcome arising from these decisions and for which there is only very limited discretion on the part of the APVMA decision maker. 

The proposal to vary MRLs in the Food Standards Code is likely to have negligible impacts on business, individuals, regulatory agencies or the economy.  Primary producers understand the need to use only registered agvet chemical products and to use those products strictly in accordance with approved label instructions.  In doing so, produce grown will be within the MRL set by the APVMA and, with the incorporation of those MRLs into the Food Standards Code by this Amendment Instrument, the sale of the produce containing residues that do not exceed the MRL will be lawful.  To this extent, the incorporation of APVMA approved MRLs into Schedule 20   of the Food Standards Code benefits rather than burdens primary producers and consumers.

Consultations

The APVMA seeks the wider community’s involvement through public consultation as part of its evaluation process for the registration of new agvet chemical products or a major extension of the use of existing products to new crops and target animals.  During this consultation phase any person may comment or raise concerns about any relevant aspect of the intended registration, sale and use of the chemical product, including proposed MRLs and the dietary exposure assessment.  The APVMA addressed any concerns that were raised at the time as part of the registration and approval process. 

More specifically, by way of notice in the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Gazettes No. APVMA 14 on 9 July 2024 the APVMA notified that it was proposing to incorporate these variations to MRLs into Schedule 20 and it invited public comment on the proposals. The APVMA did not receive any comments during this stage of the consultations.

Sanitary and Phytosanitary notifications to the World Trade Organization (WTO) were also made in relation to the variations to MRLs in Schedule 20 and no comment was received in response to that notice.

Variations to MRLs are Legislative Instruments

Pursuant to subsection 82(2) of the FSANZ Act, the variations to MRLs made by the Amendment Instrument is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the
Legislation Act 2003, but it is neither subject to the disallowance nor sunsetting provisions.

The MRLs made by the Amendment Instrument will not be subject to the disallowance or sunsetting provisions of the Legislation Act 2003. Subsections 44(1) and 54(1) of the FSANZ Act provides that a legislative instrument is not disallowable or subject to sunsetting if the enabling legislation for the instrument (in this case, the FSANZ Act): (a) facilitates the establishment or operation of an intergovernmental scheme involving the Commonwealth and one or more States and (b) authorises the instrument to be made for the purposes of the scheme. Regulation 11 of the Legislation (Exemptions and other Matters) Regulation 2015 also exempts from sunsetting legislative instruments a primary purpose of which is to give effect to an international obligation of Australia.

The FSANZ Act gives effect to an intergovernmental agreement (the Food Regulation Agreement) and facilitates the establishment or operation of an intergovernmental scheme (national uniform food regulation). For these purposes, the Act establishes the Authority to develop food standards for consideration and endorsement by the Food Ministers Meeting (FMM). The FMM is established under the Food Regulation Agreement, and consists of Commonwealth and State/Territory members. If endorsed by the FMM, the food standards on gazettal and registration are incorporated into and become part of Commonwealth and State and Territory food laws. These standards or instruments are then administered, applied and enforced by these jurisdictions regulators as part of those food laws.


NOTES ON ITEMS

Item 1 Name of Instrument

1. This item states that the full name of the Amendment Instrument is the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code — Schedule 20 — Maximum Residue Limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 3, 2024 (Amendment Instrument).

Item 2 Commencement

2. Subsection 82(8) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 has the effect that, despite the provisions in the Legislation Act 2003, a legislative instrument made by the APVMA varying Schedule 20 commences on the day a copy of the variation is published in the Gazette.

3. A Note to the item records that a copy of the variations made by the Amendment Instrument was published in the Commonwealth of Australia Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Gazette.

Item 3 Object

4. This item provides that the object of this Amendment Instrument is for the APVMA to vary Schedule 20 of the Food Standards Code to include or change MRLs pertaining to agricultural and veterinary chemical products.

Item 4 Interpretation

5. This item defines the APVMA and the Principal Instrument.

6. The APVMA is the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority established by section 6 of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992.

7. The Principal Instrument is Schedule 20 — Maximum Residue Limits of the Australia New Zealand Food Standard Code as defined in Section 4 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 being the code published in Gazette
No. P 27 on 27 August 1987 together with any amendments of the standards in that code. 

8. The definition of Principal Instrument also notes that Schedule 20 was published in the Food Standards Gazette FSC 96 on Thursday 10 April 2015 and was registered as a legislative instrument on 1 April 2015 F2015L00468.

Item 5 Variations to Schedule 20

9. This item provides that the Schedule to this Amendment Instrument sets out the variations to Schedule 20 – Maximum Residue Limits of the Food Standards Code.

10. The variations to MRLs made by the Amendment Instrument include variations made by the APVMA to the MRL Standard for July 2024 comprising amendments numbered Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code (MRL Standard) Amendment Instrument (No. 2) 2024.

 

By Authority:

Delegate of the Chief Executive Officer

of the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority

31 July 2024


STATEMENT OF COMPATIBILITY FOR A LEGISLATIVE INSTRUMENTTHAT DOES NOT RAISE ANY HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code — Schedule 20 —

Maximum Residue Limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 3 2024

 

This Legislative Instrument made by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Requirement for a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

This Legislative Instrument made by the APVMA is not a disallowable instrument pursuant to section 82(2) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 and therefore the Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is not strictly required.  Nonetheless, to accord with the spirit of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011, the APVMA provides this Statement of Compatibility. 

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

This Legislative Instrument makes variations to Schedule 20 Maximum Residue Limits   of the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code to include or change maximum residue limits (MRLs) pertaining to agricultural and veterinary chemical products.  The variations made to Schedule 20 in this Amendment Instrument put into the Food Standards Code MRLs previously approved by the APVMA as part of the registration of the relevant chemical products.  The variations have the effect of allowing the sale of food containing residues within the approved maximum limits but do not present any public health or safety concerns.  The variations also do not affect the rights or freedoms of any humans.

Human rights implications

This Legislative Instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

 

Sheila Logan,

Executive Director, Risk Assessment Capability, APVMA

 

 

Overview

The Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code — Schedule 20 — Maximum Residue Limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 3, 2024, enacted by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) under the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991, addresses the need to streamline the regulatory process and eliminate duplication in the setting of maximum residue limits (MRLs) for agricultural and veterinary chemicals in food. This instrument enables the APVMA to directly vary Schedule 20, the MRLs Standard in the Food Standards Code, to incorporate MRLs approved by the APVMA as part of the registration of chemical products. This reform was agreed to by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) in 2008 to facilitate the recognition of the APVMA’s residue risk assessment and to avoid duplication in the MRL setting process. The policy objective of this legislation is to ensure that food containing legitimate residues does not pose any public health or safety concerns, thereby allowing the lawful sale of such produce. The APVMA, an independent statutory authority, is responsible for ensuring that agricultural and veterinary chemicals used in Australia are not harmful to public health due to residues in food. The APVMA seeks public consultation during the evaluation process for new or extended chemical products, addressing any concerns raised regarding MRLs and dietary exposure assessments. The proposed MRL amendments are minor and are likely to have negligible impacts on business, individuals, regulatory agencies, or the economy, benefiting rather than burdening primary producers and consumers. The variations to Schedule 20 are not subject to disallowance or sunsetting provisions as they give effect to an international obligation of Australia and facilitate the establishment of an intergovernmental scheme.

Scope and Application

The Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—Schedule 20—Maximum Residue Limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 3, 2024, pertains to the variation of maximum residue limits (MRLs) for agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals in food products. This legislation applies to the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), which is responsible for ensuring that agvet chemicals used in Australia do not pose a risk to public health due to residues in food. The MRLs listed in Schedule 20 of the Food Standards Code are established to ensure that any residues in food products do not exceed the limits set by the APVMA. This legislation operates on a national level within Australia and is not subject to disallowance or sunsetting provisions as per the Legislation Act 2003. The APVMA is empowered to directly vary Schedule 20, reflecting the changing use patterns of agvet chemicals, including the development of new products and the withdrawal of older products following review. These variations do not present any public health or safety concerns and are incorporated into the Food Standards Code to allow the lawful sale of food containing residues within the approved limits.

Key Provisions

The main sections of the Amendment Instrument concern the variations to the Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) set out in Schedule 20 of the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (subsection 9). These variations, approved by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), reflect the changing use patterns of agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals, including the registration of new products, extensions of use for existing products, and the withdrawal of older products following review. The variations ensure that MRLs reflect current scientific assessments and usage patterns, thereby supporting safe and lawful food production and sale. The Amendment Instrument imposes specific obligations on the APVMA and other relevant entities. The APVMA is tasked with evaluating the safety and performance of agvet chemicals and determining appropriate MRLs based on residue trials and toxicological assessments (subsection 5). These MRLs are then incorporated into the Food Standards Code, ensuring that food containing residues within the approved limits can be sold lawfully. The Authority must also engage in public consultation during the evaluation process for new chemical products or significant changes to existing products, allowing stakeholders to provide feedback on proposed MRLs (subsection 10). Additionally, the APVMA is responsible for making Sanitary and Phytosanitary notifications to the World Trade Organization (WTO) regarding variations to MRLs, as required (subsection 11). Breaching the requirements set out in the Amendment Instrument can result in civil or criminal consequences. Although the specific offences and penalties are not detailed within the Amendment Instrument, the underlying legislation, the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act), provides for various penalties. For example, Section 84 of the FSANZ Act outlines that a person who contravenes a provision of the Act may be liable to a civil penalty of up to $22,200 for an individual or $111,000 for a body corporate, as determined by a court. Furthermore, serious breaches may also be subject to criminal penalties, including fines of up to $277,500 for an individual or $1,387,500 for a body corporate, and potential imprisonment for offences involving food safety and standards. The variations in MRLs are designed to ensure compliance with these standards, thereby avoiding such penalties.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Environmental Law
Instrument
Amendment Instrument
Concepts
Regulatory Standards
Commencement Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Enforcement Powers
Licensing & Registration
Prohibited Conduct

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.