Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—Schedule 20–maximum residue limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 2, 2019

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2019L00191 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

 

Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—

Schedule 20—Maximum Residue Limits

Variation Instrument No. APVMA 2, 2019

 

 

Subsection 82(1) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 provides that the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) may vary the Maximum Residue Limits Standard to include or change a permitted maximum residue limit.  The Maximum Residue Limits Standard in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (Food Standards Code) is Schedule 20 — Maximum Residue Limits. 

Schedule 20 is the Principal Instrument being amended by this Amendment Instrument.  It has existed in various forms since before the Food Standards Code was first published in 1997. 

Section 82 was part of amendments to the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act), which were proclaimed to commence on 1 March 2011, that implemented a 2008 reform agreed to by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) calling for the recognition by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) of the APVMA’s residue risk assessment and the promulgation of the resulting MRLs in the Food Standards Code, for domestically grown produce.  The reform was designed to streamline current regulatory processes and to eliminate duplication by allowing the APVMA to directly vary Schedule 20. 

The APVMA is an independent statutory authority of the Commonwealth.  Amongst other things, the APVMA is responsible for ensuring agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals used in Australia are not harmful to public health due to residues in food. 

The Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of New Zealand concerning a Joint Food Standards System excludes MRLs for residues of agvet chemicals in food from the system setting joint food standards. Australia and New Zealand independently and separately develop MRLs for agvet chemicals in food. 

Assessment and Determination of MRLs

MRLs are regulatory standards which help to monitor that the agvet chemical product has been used in accordance with the approved label instructions.  If an MRL is exceeded, it usually indicates a misuse of the chemical but does not normally indicate a public health or safety concern.

In evaluating the safety and performance of agvet chemicals, the APVMA’s assessment also includes a determination of an MRL for the chemical in relation to relevant crops and animals.  The APVMA uses data from a series of residue trials and calculates whether the application of the minimum amount of chemical that is required to achieve effective pest or disease control will leave any residue in the plant or animal commodity.  In order to legitimise the presence of these residues, MRLs are established by the APVMA by entry into the APVMA’s MRL Standard (available at http://www.comlaw.gov.au).

If there are small amounts of chemical residue in produce, the APVMA uses the toxicological evaluation and the dietary exposure assessment to examine the potential occurrence of adverse effects on human health when the produce is consumed. 

Dietary exposure assessments undertaken by the APVMA as part of the registration of the relevant chemical products indicate that the MRL variations being made by the Amendment Instrument do not present any public health and safety concerns.

Schedule 20 of lists the maximum level of the residues of an agvet chemical that may occur in foods.  Including limits for residues of agvet chemicals in foods in the Food Standards Code has the effect of allowing the sale of food containing legitimate residues, where any residues do not exceed these limits.  Variations in MRLs reflect the changing use patterns of agvet chemicals available to chemical users including food producers.  These changes include both the development of new products and crop uses, and the withdrawal of older products following review by the APVMA. 

Regulatory Impact Assessment

The proposed changes to regulation are minor and machinery in nature involving necessary technical variations to the Food Standards Code.  In November 2010, the Office of Best Practice Regulation provided a standing exemption from the need to assess if a Regulatory Impact Statement is required for applications relating to variations to MRLs.

The proposed MRL amendments are an essential consequence of the decision by the APVMA to register agvet chemical products (or to vary and extend their approved label instructions); or to issue a permit in relation to an agvet chemical product; or an outcome of a review decision by the APVMA to withdraw or restrict older agvet chemical products.  The setting of an MRL and its incorporation in the Food Standards Code is a science-based outcome arising from these decisions and for which there is only very limited discretion on the part of the APVMA decision maker. 

The proposal to vary MRLs in the Food Standards Code is likely to have negligible impacts on business, individuals, regulatory agencies or the economy.  Primary producers understand the need to use only registered agvet chemical products and to use those products strictly in accordance with approved label instructions.  In doing so, produce grown will be within the MRL set by the APVMA and, with the incorporation of those MRLs into the Food Standards Code by this Amendment Instrument, the sale of the produce containing residues that do not exceed the MRL will be lawful.  To this extent, the incorporation of APVMA approved MRLs into Schedule 20   of the Food Standards Code benefits rather than burdens primary producers and consumers.

Consultations

The APVMA seeks the wider community’s involvement through public consultation as part of its evaluation process for the registration of new agvet chemical products or a major extension of the use of existing products to new crops and target animals.  During this consultation phase any person may comment or raise concerns about any relevant aspect of the intended registration, sale and use of the chemical product, including proposed MRLs and the dietary exposure assessment.  The APVMA addressed any concerns that were raised at the time as part of the registration and approval process. 

More specifically, by way of notice in the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Gazette (No. APVMA 24) on 4 December 2018 the APVMA notified that it was proposing to incorporate these variations to MRLs into Schedule 20 and it invited public comment on the proposals. The APVMA did not receive any comments during this stage of the consultations.

A Sanitary and Phytosanitary notification to the World Trade Organization (WTO) was also made in relation to the variations to MRLs in Schedule 20 and comment was received in response to that notice that resulted in the decision to not progress the imidacloprid MRL reduction for carrot at this time.

Variations to MRLs are Legislative Instruments

Pursuant to subsection 82(2) of the FSANZ Act, the variations to MRLs made by the Amendment Instrument is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the
Legislation Act 2003, but it is neither subject to the disallowance nor sunsetting provisions. 


NOTES ON ITEMS

Item 1 Name of Instrument

1. This item states that the full name of the Amendment Instrument is the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code — Schedule 20 — Maximum Residue Limits Amendment Instrument No. APVMA 2, 2019.

Item 2 Commencement

2. Subsection 82(8) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 has the effect that, despite the provisions in the Legislation Act 2003, a legislative instrument made by the APVMA varying Schedule 20 commences on the day a copy of the variation is published in the Gazette.

3. A Note to the item records that a copy of the variations made by the Amendment Instrument was published in the Commonwealth of Australia Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Gazette.

Item 3 Object

4. This item provides that the object of this Amendment Instrument is for the APVMA to vary Schedule 20 of the Food Standards Code to include or change MRLs pertaining to agricultural and veterinary chemical products.

Item 4 Interpretation

5. This item defines the APVMA and the Principal Instrument.

6. The APVMA is the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority established by section 6 of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Administration) Act 1992.

7. The Principal Instrument is Schedule 20 — Maximum Residue Limits of the Australia New Zealand Food Standard Code as defined in Section 4 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 being the code published in Gazette
No. P 27 on 27 August 1987 together with any amendments of the standards in that code. 

8. The definition of Principal Instrument also notes that Schedule 20 was published in the Food Standards Gazette FSC 96 on Thursday 10 April 2015 and was registered as a legislative instrument on 1 April 2015 F2015L00468.

Item 5 Variations to Schedule 20

9. This item provides that the Schedule to this Amendment Instrument sets out the variations to Schedule 20 – Maximum Residue Limits of the Food Standards Code.

10. The variations to MRLs made by the Amendment Instrument include variations made by the APVMA to the MRL Standard for December 2018 comprising amendments numbered (Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Instrument No. 4 (MRL Standard) Amendment Instrument 2016 (No. 11)) inclusive.

 

By Authority:

Chief Executive Officer

Delegate of the APVMA

21 February 2019


STATEMENT OF COMPATIBILITY FOR A LEGISLATIVE INSTRUMENTTHAT DOES NOT RAISE ANY HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—Schedule 20—Maximum Residue Limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 2, 2019, was enacted to allow the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) to vary the Maximum Residue Limits (MRL) Standard for agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals used in Australia. This legislative instrument was introduced to address the need for a streamlined regulatory process that recognises the APVMA's residue risk assessment and the promulgation of resulting MRLs in the Food Standards Code, as agreed by the Council of Australian Governments in 2008. The APVMA, an independent statutory authority of the Commonwealth, is responsible for ensuring that agvet chemicals used in Australia do not harm public health due to residues in food. The variations in MRLs reflect the changing use patterns of agvet chemicals and are a direct consequence of decisions made by the APVMA regarding the registration, use, or withdrawal of these products. The variations are incorporated into Schedule 20 of the Food Standards Code, allowing the sale of food containing legitimate residues, provided they do not exceed the MRLs. This process ensures that the produce grown and sold complies with the standards set by the APVMA, benefiting both primary producers and consumers.

Scope and Application

The Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code—Schedule 20—Maximum Residue Limits Variation Instrument No. APVMA 2, 2019 applies to the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) and pertains to the regulation of maximum residue limits (MRLs) for agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals in food. This legislation allows the APVMA to vary the MRLs in Schedule 20 of the Food Standards Code, which is a schedule listing the maximum levels of residues of agvet chemicals that may occur in food. The changes made by this instrument are intended to reflect the current use patterns of agvet chemicals, including the introduction of new products and the withdrawal of older ones following review. The APVMA ensures that these variations do not present any public health or safety concerns through toxicological evaluations and dietary exposure assessments. This Act applies nationally across Australia, and the APVMA, being a Commonwealth statutory authority, is responsible for implementing these variations. The variations are made pursuant to subsection 82(1) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 and are a legislative instrument under the Legislation Act 2003. This Amendment Instrument does not extend or restrict application through subordinate instruments, and there are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds mentioned in the explanatory statement.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this Amendment Instrument pertain to the variations of the Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) in Schedule 20 of the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code, as per section 82(1) of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act). Specifically, this Amendment Instrument, numbered APVMA 2, 2019, provides the authority for the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) to include or change MRLs in the MRLs Standard, which is Schedule 20 of the Food Standards Code (section 4). These changes, as outlined in the Schedule, are effective from the date they are published in the Gazette, in accordance with subsection 82(8) of the FSANZ Act (item 2). The APVMA has the obligation to assess and determine MRLs for agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals, ensuring that these chemicals, when used according to approved label instructions, do not pose a risk to public health. This process involves evaluating data from residue trials, conducting a toxicological evaluation, and performing a dietary exposure assessment to ensure that any residues in food do not exceed safe limits (section 82). The APVMA’s determination of MRLs is science-based and is incorporated into the APVMA’s MRL Standard (section 82). The variations made to MRLs in this Amendment Instrument reflect the APVMA’s decisions on the registration, variation, or withdrawal of agvet chemical products, and their incorporation into the Food Standards Code allows for the lawful sale of produce containing residues that do not exceed these limits (item 3). The Amendment Instrument imposes several requirements on the APVMA and other parties. The APVMA must undertake a public consultation process as part of the evaluation of new agvet chemical products or significant extensions to the use of existing products, allowing for public comment on proposed MRLs (section 82). Additionally, the APVMA must notify the public of proposed variations to MRLs and invite comments, as demonstrated by the notice in the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Gazette (item 5). Any variations to MRLs must be published in the Gazette to become effective (item 2). The APVMA must also ensure that MRLs set in the MRL Standard are incorporated into Schedule 20 of the Food Standards Code (section 82). There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined in this Amendment Instrument for breach of its provisions. However, any breaches of the MRLs set in Schedule 20 could lead to regulatory actions under the FSANZ Act or other relevant legislation, potentially resulting in fines or other penalties for those found in violation of food safety standards. The APVMA’s role is to ensure compliance with these standards through the establishment and enforcement of MRLs.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Food Law
Environmental Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.