AusLink (National Land Transport) Act 2005 - Variation of the AusLink Roads to Recovery List Instrument No. 2008/3

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2008L01998 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

AusLink (National Land Transport) Act 2005

 

Explanatory statement – Variation of AusLink Roads to Recovery List No. 2008/3

 

On 2 August 2005, the Minister determined a list of bodies to receive Roads to Recovery funds (the list) and their allocations as required under s.87 of the AusLink (National Land Transport) Act 2005 (the Act).  The bodies listed are the local government authorities that existed at the time but there is provision in the Act to amend the list to take account of council amalgamations etc.  Several changes have already occurred which are now reflected in the list.

 

Local government in Queensland was restructured with effect from 15 March 2008 and the list was amended by instrument 2008/1 to reflect these changes.  Unfortunately, the instrument purported to remove eight funding recipients which are listed in the original August 2005 list under slightly different names.  It is necessary to amend the list to remove these councils using the names by which they are listed in the original instrument.

 

The name of one of the eight councils proposed for removal, the Erub Community Community Council, appears to be an error.  In fact, we understand that it is, with the duplicated word, the alternative name for the Erub Island Council.  This instrument removes the name as it appears in the original list.

 

Section 88(3) of the Act allows for the errors to be corrected.  This instrument will correct those errors.

Overview

The AusLink (National Land Transport) Act 2005, enacted by the Australian Parliament, was designed to facilitate national land transport infrastructure, including the allocation of Roads to Recovery funds to various local government authorities for transport-related projects. The Act’s objective is to ensure that funding is efficiently directed towards improving and maintaining the national land transport network. In 2008, an explanatory statement was issued regarding a variation to the AusLink Roads to Recovery List No. 2008/3. This amendment was necessary due to structural changes in local government authorities, particularly in Queensland, which necessitated updates to the original list of funding recipients established in August 2005. The statement acknowledges errors in the original instrument, such as the incorrect listing of the Erub Community Community Council, and seeks to correct these discrepancies in alignment with the Act's provisions for list amendments.

Scope and Application

The AusLink (National Land Transport) Act 2005 applies to local government authorities that are designated to receive Roads to Recovery funds, which are intended to support infrastructure projects across the country. This Act is a Commonwealth Act and thus applies across the entire nation, impacting local governments and their respective infrastructure projects. The Act allows for the amendment of the list of funding recipients to account for changes such as council amalgamations or restructuring, as seen in the recent changes in Queensland local government areas. The Explanatory Statement details a specific instrument (2008/1) that amended the list to reflect the local government restructuring that took effect on 15 March 2008. However, this instrument incorrectly removed certain councils from the list, and an additional correction instrument is needed to rectify these errors. The Act provides the authority to correct such errors, ensuring that the intended recipients of the Roads to Recovery funds are accurately identified and supported.

Key Provisions

The primary sections of the AusLink (National Land Transport) Act 2005 relevant to this variation are Section 87 and Section 88(3). Section 87 establishes the criteria for determining which local government authorities will receive Roads to Recovery funds, while Section 88(3) provides a mechanism to correct any errors in the list of funding recipients. The Act mandates that the Minister determine the list of eligible local government authorities and their respective allocations of funds (s.87). The Act also allows for amendments to this list to account for council amalgamations or other structural changes in local government (s.88). Under this Act, the Minister has specific obligations to ensure that the list of funding recipients is accurate and up-to-date. This includes reviewing and updating the list whenever there are changes in the structure of local government authorities. The Minister must also correct any errors in the list, such as incorrect names or omissions, to ensure that the intended recipients receive the allocated funds. This obligation is highlighted in Section 88(3) of the Act, which provides the authority to make necessary corrections. Failure to accurately maintain the list of funding recipients can result in certain legal consequences. While the Act does not specify detailed penalties for errors in the list, the omission of a council or incorrect identification of a funding recipient could lead to administrative challenges and potential legal disputes. Correcting these errors is crucial to avoid such complications and ensure the smooth administration of the Roads to Recovery funds. The legislative instrument amends the list to reflect the correct names and remove any errors, thereby mitigating the risk of legal issues arising from inaccuracies in the list. In summary, the AusLink (National Land Transport) Act 2005 requires the Minister to determine and maintain an accurate list of local government authorities eligible for Roads to Recovery funds. Section 87 sets out the criteria for this determination, while Section 88(3) allows for corrections to be made when errors are identified. The obligations of the Minister include ensuring the list is updated to reflect any structural changes in local government and correcting any errors to maintain the integrity of the funding allocation process. Failure to accurately maintain this list could lead to administrative challenges and potential legal disputes.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Planning & Development Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.