ASIC Market Integrity Rules (Securities Markets) Class Waiver Instrument 2020/870

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2020L01354 Rules Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

ASIC Market Integrity Rules (Securities Markets) Class Waiver Instrument 2020/870

 

About this compilation

 

Compilation No. 1

 

This is a compilation of ASIC Market Integrity Rules (Securities Markets) Class Waiver Instrument 2020/870 as in force on 11 November 2021. It includes any commenced amendment affecting the legislative instrument to that date.

 

This compilation was prepared by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

 

The notes at the end of this compilation (the endnotes) include information

about amending instruments and the amendment history of each amended provision.

 

 

Contents

Part 1—Preliminary

1 Name of legislative instrument

3 Authority

4 Definitions and interpretation

5 Cessation and suspension as Notionally Accredited Adviser

Part 2—Waivers

6 Accreditation Requirements and Notionally Accredited Advisers

7  Conditions

8 Application for review by Administrative Appeals Tribunal

9 Notice of reviewable decision and review rights

10 Cessation

Endnotes

Endnote 1—Instrument history

Endnote 2—Amendment history

Part 1—Preliminary

1 Name of legislative instrument

This is the ASIC Market Integrity Rules (Securities Markets) Class Waiver Instrument 2020/870.

3 Authority

This instrument is made under subrule 1.2.1(1) and rule 1.2.3 of the ASIC Market Integrity Rules (Securities Markets) 2017 (Rules).

4               Definitions and interpretation

 (1)  In this instrument:

notionally accredited: a person is notionally accredited as:

(a) a Level One Notionally Accredited Derivatives Adviser if:

(i) the person was a Level One Accredited Derivatives Adviser immediately before the Renewal Date in relation to the person; and

(ii) the person’s notional accreditation as a Level One Notionally Accredited Derivatives Adviser has not ceased, and is not suspended, under section 5; and

(b) a Level Two Notionally Accredited Derivatives Adviser if:

(i) the person was a Level Two Accredited Derivatives Adviser immediately before the Renewal Date in relation to the person; and

(ii) the person’s notional accreditation as a Level Two Notionally Accredited Derivatives Adviser has not ceased, and is not suspended, under section 5; and

(c) a Notionally Accredited Futures Adviser if:

(i) the person was an Accredited Futures Adviser immediately before the Renewal Date in relation to the person; and

(ii) the person’s notional accreditation as a Notionally Accredited Futures Adviser has not ceased, and is not suspended, under section 5.

Notionally Accredited Adviser means a person who is notionally accredited as:

(a) a Level One Notionally Accredited Derivatives Adviser; or

(b) a Level Two Notionally Accredited Derivatives Adviser; or

(c) a Notionally Accredited Futures Adviser.

(2) In this instrument, unless the contrary intention appears, capitalised terms have the same meaning as in the Rules.

5               Cessation and suspension as Notionally Accredited Adviser

Automatic cessation as Notionally Accredited Adviser

(1) A person ceases to be a Notionally Accredited Adviser if the person ceases to be a Representative of the Market Participant that made the application for the person to be accredited as an Accredited Adviser.

Voluntary cessation as Notionally Accredited Adviser

(2) A person ceases to be a Notionally Accredited Adviser in a category of notional accreditation on a Trading Day if the Market Participant in relation to whom the person is a Notionally Accredited Adviser gives ASIC a written notice:

(a) stating that the person will cease to be a Notionally Accredited Adviser in that category of notional accreditation on the Trading Day; and

(b)  that is made in accordance with subsection (3).

(3) A notice referred to in subsection (2) is made in accordance with this subsection if the notice:

(a) includes the following:

(i) the name and date of birth of the Notionally Accredited Adviser;

(ii) the name and business address of the Market Participant;

(iii) the category of the notional accreditation which is to cease;

(iv) the Trading Day on which the cessation will take effect;

(v) the reasons for cessation of the notional accreditation;

(vi) the name, position and contact telephone number of the director, partner, senior manager or Compliance Manager of the Market Participant referred to in subparagraph (b)(i); and

(b) is signed and dated by:

(i) a director, partner, senior manager or Compliance Manager of the Market Participant; and

(ii) the Notionally Accredited Adviser.

Cessation or suspension by ASIC

(4) The notional accreditation of a person who is a Notionally Accredited Adviser in a category of notional accreditation ceases or is suspended (as the case may be) if ASIC gives the person and the Market Participant notice in writing that:

(a) the notional accreditation of the person in that category of notional accreditation has ceased or is suspended (as the case may be) as a result of ASIC having reason to believe that the person does not have the requisite skill, knowledge or integrity to provide financial product advice of the kind covered by the relevant category of accreditation; and

(b) includes the reasons for the cessation or suspension.

(5) A cessation or suspension in a category of notional accreditation as a result of ASIC giving notice under subsection (4):

(a) takes effect on the Trading Day specified in the notice; and

(b) in the case of a suspension, continues for the period specified in the notice.


Part 2—Waivers

6 Accreditation Requirements and Notionally Accredited Advisers

(1) A Market Participant does not have to comply with any of the following in relation to a Representative of the Market Participant:

(a) subrule 2.4.1(1) of the Rules;

(b) subrule 2.4.2(1) of the Rules;

(c) subrule 2.4.4(1) of the Rules;

(d)   Rule 2.4.5 of the Rules.

(2) A Market Participant does not have to comply with subrule 2.4.1(2) of the Rules to the extent that the subrule would otherwise:

(a) prohibit the Market Participant from holding out that a Representative holds a type of accreditation under the Rules that corresponds to a type of notional accreditation held by the Representative; or

(b) require the Market Participant to ensure that a Representative does not hold out that the Representative holds a type of accreditation under the Rules that corresponds to a type of notional accreditation held by the Representative.

(3) A Market Participant does not have to comply with Rule 2.4.22 of the Rules in relation to the operation of a Managed Discretionary Account by a Representative of the Market Participant.

Where waivers apply

(4) The waiver in subsection (1) applies:

(a) in relation to paragraph 2.4.1(1)(a), (b) or (c) (as the case may be) of the Rules—where the Representative is a Notionally Accredited Adviser in a category of notional accreditation that corresponds to the category of accreditation required in relation to paragraph 2.4.1(1)(a), (b) or (c) (as the case may be); and

(b) in relation to subrule 2.4.2(1) of the Rules—where the Representative is a Level One Notionally Accredited Derivatives Adviser or a Level Two Notionally Accredited Derivatives Adviser; and

(c) in relation to subrule 2.4.4(1) of the Rules—where the Representative is a Level Two Notionally Accredited Derivatives Adviser; and

(d) in relation to Rule 2.4.5 of the Rules—where the Representative is a Notionally Accredited Futures Adviser.

(5) The waiver in subsection (3) applies where the Representative is a Notionally Accredited Adviser in a category of notional accreditation that corresponds to the category of accreditation required by Rule 2.4.22 of the Rules.

7  Conditions

A Market Participant that relies on a waiver in section 6 in relation to a Representative:

 

(a) if the Representative ceases to be a Representative of the Market Participant and as a consequence ceases to be a Notionally Accredited Adviser because of subsection 5(1)—must notify ASIC in writing of the following within five Business Days of the Representative ceasing to be a Representative:

(i) the name and date of birth of the Representative;

(ii) the date the Representative ceased to be a Representative; and

 (b) must not hold out that the Representative, and must ensure that the Representative does not hold themselves out, as holding a type of notional accreditation if the Representative does not hold that type of notional accreditation; and

(c) if the Representative is notionally accredited only as a Level One Notionally Accredited Derivatives Adviser—must ensure that the Representative does not advise or make recommendations in relation to LEPOs; and

(d) must ensure that the Representative complies with any continuing professional education requirements under Rule 2.4.21 as if the Representative were an Accredited Adviser holding the type of accreditation under the Rules that corresponds to the type of notional accreditation held by the Representative.

Note:  The conditions imposed on a waiver must be complied with in order for the waiver to be effective: subrule 1.2.1(2) of the Rules

8 Application for review by Administrative Appeals Tribunal

(1)  Subject to this section, applications may be made to the Tribunal for review of a decision made by ASIC ceasing or suspending the notional accreditation of a person under subsection 5(4).

(2)  An application under subsection (1) may only be made by:

(a) the person whose notional accreditation has been ceased or suspended; or

(b) the Market Participant for which the person is a Representative;

(3)  In this section and in section 9:

decision has the same meaning as in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.

9 Notice of reviewable decision and review rights

(1)  This section applies if ASIC makes a decision to which section 8 applies.

(2)  ASIC must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances to give to each person who may make an application for review of the decision under section 8 notice, in writing or otherwise:

(a)        of the making of the decision; and

(b)       of the person’s right to have the decision reviewed by the Tribunal.

(3)  A failure to comply with this Rule does not affect the validity of the decision.

10 Cessation

The waivers in section 6 cease to apply at the end of 30 November 2023.


Endnotes

Endnote 1—Instrument history

Instrument number

Date of FRL registration

Date of commencement

Application, saving or transitional provisions

2020/870

20/10/2020/ (see F2020L01354)

21/10/2020

 

2021/926

10/11/2021 (see F2021L01527)

11/11/2021

-

Endnote 2—Amendment history

ad. = added or inserted     am. = amended     LA = Legislation Act 2003    rep. = repealed     rs. = repealed and substituted

Provision affected 

How affected

Section 2

rep. s48D LA

Section 10

am. 2021/926

 

 

Overview

The ASIC Market Integrity Rules (Securities Markets) Class Waiver Instrument 2020/870 was enacted to provide specific waivers from certain accreditation requirements for representatives of market participants who were previously accredited derivatives and futures advisers. This legislative instrument was made under the authority of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) pursuant to the ASIC Market Integrity Rules (Securities Markets) 2017. The primary objective of this instrument is to streamline the process for market participants by offering relief from certain compliance obligations, thereby facilitating smoother transitions and adjustments within the securities markets. The waivers are intended to assist market participants in managing their operations more efficiently while maintaining a baseline standard of competence and integrity among those providing financial product advice. The instrument includes provisions for the cessation of these waivers after a specified period, ending on 30 November 2023, ensuring that any transitional benefits are temporary and do not undermine the overall regulatory framework.

Scope and Application

The ASIC Market Integrity Rules (Securities Markets) Class Waiver Instrument 2020/870 applies to Market Participants and Representatives within the securities markets in Australia, specifically to those who were previously accredited derivatives and futures advisers. This legislative instrument provides a class waiver from certain accreditation requirements for these individuals when they are notionally accredited. A notionally accredited person is one who was previously an accredited adviser but is now notionally accredited due to changes in their status or the status of the market participant they represent. The instrument specifies that certain accreditation requirements do not apply to these notionally accredited advisers under certain conditions, but it also imposes conditions that must be met for the waivers to be effective. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this instrument is national, applying across Australia. Notably, the waivers provided by this instrument cease to apply at the end of 30 November 2023, and the instrument may be further amended through subordinate legislation as necessary.

Key Provisions

The ASIC Market Integrity Rules (Securities Markets) Class Waiver Instrument 2020/870, compiled as of 11 November 2021, provides certain exemptions to Market Participants from specified accreditation requirements for their Representatives who hold notional accreditation as advisers. Section 6(1) specifies that Market Participants are exempt from complying with subrule 2.4.1(1) of the Rules, subrule 2.4.2(1) of the Rules, subrule 2.4.4(1) of the Rules, and Rule 2.4.5 of the Rules in relation to Representatives who hold notional accreditation as Level One or Level Two Notionally Accredited Derivatives Advisers, or as Notionally Accredited Futures Advisers, provided the Representatives' notional accreditation corresponds to the required category of accreditation. Furthermore, Section 6(2) exempts Market Participants from the prohibition in subrule 2.4.1(2) of the Rules, insofar as it would otherwise restrict the Market Participant from holding out that a Representative holds a type of accreditation that corresponds to a type of notional accreditation held by the Representative, or require the Market Participant to ensure that a Representative does not hold out that the Representative holds a type of accreditation that corresponds to a type of notional accreditation held by the Representative. Section 6(3) exempts Market Participants from Rule 2.4.22 of the Rules in relation to the operation of a Managed Discretionary Account by a Representative who holds a type of notional accreditation that corresponds to the category of accreditation required by Rule 2.4.22 of the Rules. The Market Participants are required to comply with certain conditions to benefit from these waivers. For instance, if a Representative ceases to be a Representative of the Market Participant and consequently ceases to be a Notionally Accredited Adviser, the Market Participant must notify ASIC in writing within five Business Days of the Representative ceasing to be a Representative, as outlined in Section 7(a). Additionally, if the Representative is notionally accredited only as a Level One Notionally Accredited Derivatives Adviser, the Market Participant must ensure that the Representative does not advise or make recommendations in relation to LEPOs, as per Section 7(c). The Act imposes several obligations on the Market Participants and the Representatives. For example, Market Participants must not hold out that the Representative, and must ensure that the Representative does not hold themselves out, as holding a type of notional accreditation if the Representative does not hold that type of notional accreditation, as specified in Section 7(b). Also, Market Participants must ensure that the Representative complies with any continuing professional education requirements under Rule 2.4.21 as if the Representative were an Accredited Adviser holding the type of accreditation under the Rules that corresponds to the type of notional accreditation held by the Representative, as per Section 7(d). The Act does not explicitly state any offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach of its provisions. However, it is reasonable to infer that failure to comply with the conditions imposed on a waiver would result in the waiver being ineffective, as per subrule 1.2.1(2) of the Rules. Additionally, it is implied that the Administrative Appeals Tribunal may review decisions made by ASIC under Section 8 and 9 of the Act.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Financial Services Regulation
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Cessation Provisions
Review & Sunset Clauses

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.