ASIC Market Integrity Rules (ASX Market) Amendment 2012 (No. 3)

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2012L02248 Rules Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

ASIC Market Integrity Rules (ASX Market) Amendment 2012 (No. 3)

 

This compilation was prepared on 12 September 2013 taking into account amendments up to ASIC Market Integrity Rules (ASX Market) Amendment 2013 (No. 2). See the Notes at the end of these Rules.


Australian Securities and Investments Commission

Corporations Act 2001 — Subsection 798G(1) — Variation

1. Enabling legislation

I, Greg Yanco, with the written consent of the Minister, make the following instrument under subsection 798G(1) of the Corporations Act 2001.

 

Dated this 20th day of November 2012

 

 

 

Signed by Greg Yanco

as a delegate of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

2. Title

This instrument is ASIC Market Integrity Rules (ASX Market) Amendment 2012 (No. 3).

3. Commencement

Each provision of this instrument specified in column 1 of the table commences in accordance with column 2 of the table.

Commencement information

Items of Schedule 1

Commencement

All Items other than Items [30] to [34]

The day that is 18 months after the day on which this instrument is registered under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

Items [30] to [34]

The day after the day on which this instrument is registered under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

Note: An instrument is registered when it is recorded on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments (FRLI) in electronic form: see Legislative Instruments Act 2003, s 4 (definition of register). The FRLI may be accessed at http://www.frli.gov.au/.

4. Amendments

Schedule 1 amends the ASIC Market Integrity Rules (ASX Market) 2010.

Schedule 1  Amendments

[1] Rule 1.4.3, after the definition of “AFSL”

insert

AOP Annual Notification” has the meaning given by subrule 5.6.8B(1).

AOP Annual Review” has the meaning given by Rule 5.6.8A.

AOP Annual Review Date” means 1 November each calendar year.

AOP Initial Certification” has the meaning given by Rule 5.6.6.

AOP Material Change Review” has the meaning given by subrule 5.6.8(1).

[2] Rule 1.4.3, definition of “Authorised Person”, subparagraph (a)(i)

omit

or

[3] Rule 1.4.3, definition of Authorised Person, subparagraph (a)(ii)

omit

and

substitute

or

[4] Rule 1.4.3, definition of “Authorised Person, after subparagraph (a)(ii)

insert

(iii)     a Representative of a Trading Participant; and

[5] Rule 5.6.3

before “A Trading Participant”, insert

(1)

[6] Rule 5.6.3(b)

after “;”, omit

and

[7] Rule 5.6.3(c)

omit

markets provided by the Market Participant

insert

the Market

[8] Rule 5.6.3(c)

omit

.

substitute

;

[9] Rule 5.6.3, after paragraph (c)

insert

(d)       controls, including automated controls, that enable immediate suspension, limitation or prohibition of the conduct of all Automated Order Processing or Automated Order Processing in respect of:

(i)         one or more Authorised Persons or clients;

(ii)       Automated Client Order Processing; or

(iii)     one or more Products; and

(e)        controls that enable immediate:

(i)         suspension of, limitation of, or prohibition on, the entry into the Market of Trading Messages in a series of related Trading Messages where the Trading Participant has identified that Trading Messages in the series have entered the Market and have interfered with or are likely to interfere with the efficiency or integrity of the Market;

(ii)       cancellation of Trading Messages in a series that have already entered the Market where the entry of further messages in the series has been suspended, limited or prohibited under subparagraph (i);

(iii)     suspension of, limitation of, or prohibition on, the entry into any Crossing System operated by the Trading Participant of Orders in a series of related Orders where the Trading Participant has identified that Orders in the series have entered the Crossing System operated by the Trading Participant and have interfered with or are likely to interfere with the efficiency or integrity of the Crossing System; and

(iv)      cancellation of Orders in a series that have already entered a Crossing System operated by the Trading Participant where the entry of further Orders in the series has been suspended, limited or prohibited under subparagraph (iii).

[10] Rule 5.6.3

add, before “Maximum penalty: $1,000,000”

(2) A Trading Participant that uses its system for Automated Order Processing must have direct control over all automated filters and the filter parameters for those filters.

[11] Subrule 5.6.5(1)

omit

their Automated Order Processing system meets the requirements of each of paragraphs 5.6.3(a), (b) and (c)

substitute

the Trading Participant has in place organisational and technical resources, arrangements and controls in relation to the system for Automated Order Processing that meet the requirements of Rule 5.6.3

[12] Subrule 5.6.5(2)

after “subrule (1)” insert

must

[13] Paragraph 5.6.5(2)(a)

omit

must

[14] Paragraph 5.6.5(2)(a)

after “the” (first occurring), insert

organisational and technical resources, arrangements and

[15] Paragraph 5.6.5(2)(c)

after “;”, insert

and

[16] Paragraph 5.6.6(1)(a)

after “certification”, insert

(“AOP Initial Certification”).

[17] Paragraphs 5.6.6(1)(b)

omit

certification

substitute

AOP Initial Certification

[18] Subrule 5.6.6(2)

omit

written certification

substitute

AOP Initial Certification

[19] Subparagraph 5.6.6(2)(d)(iii)

after “the” (third occurring), insert

organisational and technical resources, arrangements and

[20] Rule 5.6.7

omit the rule

[21] Rule 5.6.8 (heading)

omit

Material change review

substitute

AOP Material Change Review

[22] Rule 5.6.8

before “Before”, insert

(1)

[23] Rule 5.6.8

after “resources”, insert

, arrangements or controls

[24] Rule 5.6.8

omit

, for the purposes of providing the confirmation referred to in Rule 5.6.9 or the further certification referred to in Rule 5.6.10,

[25] Rule 5.6.8

after “review”, insert

(“AOP Material Change Review”)

[26] Rule 5.6.8

after “these Rules.”, insert

(2) Before implementing a material change the subject of an AOP Material Change Review the Trading Participant must, for the purposes of providing the AOP Annual Notification, obtain written representations from the person who performed the AOP Material Change Review that nothing came to the attention of the person during the course of the AOP Material Change Review that would indicate that the Trading Participant is unable to comply with Part 5.6 of these Rules.

(3) The representations referred to in subrule (2) must:

(a)        include the name of the person making the representation; and

(b)       be signed and dated by the person making the representation.

[27] After Rule 5.6.8

insert

5.6.8A AOP Annual Review

(1) Where a Trading Participant has not performed an AOP Material Change Review in relation to an Automated Order Processing system in the 12 months before the AOP Annual Review Date, the Trading Participant must, for the purposes of providing the AOP Annual Notification in relation to that Automated Order Processing system, ensure that an appropriately qualified person performs a review (“AOP Annual Review”) of the Automated Order Processing system, the Trading Participant’s policies, procedures, system design documentation, including the Trading Participant’s procedures for implementation of changes to the Automated Order Processing software, filters and filter parameters and other relevant documentation concerning the Trading Participant’s compliance with Part 5.6 of these Rules.

(2) The Trading Participant must, for the purposes of providing the AOP Annual Notification in relation to an Automated Order Processing system, obtain written representations from the person who performed the AOP Annual Review in relation to the Automated Order Processing system, that nothing came to the attention of the person during the course of the AOP Annual Review that would indicate that the Trading Participant is unable to comply with Part 5.6 of these Rules.

(3) The representations referred to in subrule (2) must:

(a)        include the name of the person making the representation; and

(b)       be signed and dated by the person making the representation.

Maximum penalty: $100,000

5.6.8B AOP Annual Notification

(1) A Trading Participant must, within 10 Business Days of each AOP Annual Review Date, given a written notice (“AOP Annual Notification”) to ASIC that includes:

(a)        the name of the Trading Participant; and

(b)       the version number and name of the Trading Participant’s Automated Order Processing system; and

(c)        a confirmation by the Trading Participant that nothing came to the attention of the Trading Participant during the 12 months before the AOP Annual Review date that would indicate that the Trading Participant is unable to comply with Part 5.6 of these Rules; and

(d)       the name of the directors of the Trading Participant referred to in subrule (2).

(2) At least two directors of the Trading Participant must sign and date the AOP Annual Notification.

Maximum penalty: $100,000

[28] Rule 5.6.9

omit the rule

[29] Rule 5.6.10

omit the rule

[30] Rule 6.4.1

omit

Market Bid

substitute

Takeover Bid

[31] Rule 6.4.3

omit

Market Bid

substitute

Takeover Bid

[32] Subparagraph 7.1.1(2)(g)(vi)

omit

and

[33] After paragraph 7.1.1(2)(g)

insert

(ga) information for the order or trade recorded by the Market Operator in accordance with subrule 5A.2.2(1) of the Competition Market Integrity Rules; and

[34] At the end of Rule 7.1.2

insert

Note: There is no penalty for this rule.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes to ASIC Market Integrity Rules (ASX Market) Amendment 2012 (No. 3)

Note 1

ASIC Market Integrity Rules (ASX Market) Amendment 2012 (No. 3) (in force under s798G(1) of the Corporations Act 2001) as shown in this compilation comprises those Rules amended as indicated in the tables below.

Table of Instruments

Instrument name

Date of FRLI registration

Date of commencement

Application, saving or transitional provisions

ASIC Market Integrity Rules (ASX Market) Amendment 2012 (No. 3) (F2012L02248)

26/11/2012

All Items other than Items [30] to [34]: 26/05/2014

Items [30] to [34]: 27/11/2012

-

ASIC Market Integrity Rules (ASX Market) Amendment 2013 (No. 2) (F2013L01555)

09/08/2013

Items [1] to [3] in Schedule 2: 10/08/2013

-

Table of Amendments

ad. = added or inserted     am. = amended     rep. = repealed     rs. = repealed and substituted

Provision affected

How affected

Schedule 1, item [9]

am. F2013L01555, Schedule 2, items [1] to [3]

 

 

Overview

The ASIC Market Integrity Rules (ASX Market) Amendment 2012 (No. 3) was enacted to address gaps and problems related to the management and oversight of automated order processing systems used by trading participants on the ASX Market. This legislative instrument was prepared under the authority of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and pursuant to subsection 798G(1) of the Corporations Act 2001. It aims to ensure that trading participants have adequate controls and oversight mechanisms in place to manage the risks associated with automated order processing systems, thereby maintaining market integrity and efficiency. The instrument introduces amendments to the ASIC Market Integrity Rules (ASX Market) 2010, including changes to definitions, requirements for automated order processing controls, and additional obligations for trading participants concerning the review and certification of these systems. This amendment was made to respond to identified issues in the existing regulatory framework, particularly those relating to the potential for market disruptions caused by failures or misuse of automated trading systems. By implementing these changes, the legislation seeks to enhance the oversight and management of automated order processing, ensuring that such systems operate in a manner that protects market participants and maintains the integrity of the ASX Market. The policy objective is to foster a more resilient and secure trading environment, thereby enhancing investor confidence and the overall stability of the financial markets.

Scope and Application

The ASIC Market Integrity Rules (ASX Market) Amendment 2012 (No. 3) applies to Trading Participants and Authorised Persons who are involved in the operations of the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) market, specifically relating to automated order processing (AOP) systems. This amendment extends to any person or entity that engages in trading activities on the ASX market and mandates that they comply with the revised rules concerning AOP systems. The rules impose certain requirements and controls that these participants must implement to ensure the integrity and efficiency of the market, including the immediate suspension, limitation, or prohibition of conduct for specified persons or products, and the suspension or cancellation of trading messages or orders in series that interfere with market efficiency or integrity. The amendments also require Trading Participants to have direct control over automated filters and filter parameters, and to establish appropriate organisational and technical resources, arrangements, and controls for their AOP systems. The rules have a national reach as they are enacted under the Corporations Act 2001, which applies throughout Australia. The commencement date for most provisions is 26 May 2014, with certain provisions commencing on 27 November 2012. The application of these rules is further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which may include additional regulations or guidelines issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

Key Provisions

The ASIC Market Integrity Rules (ASX Market) Amendment 2012 (No. 3) introduces several significant changes to the existing rules, primarily focusing on enhancing the control and oversight of Automated Order Processing (AOP) systems used by Trading Participants in the ASX market. These amendments are made under the authority of the Corporations Act 2001, specifically subsection 798G(1). The amendments are designed to ensure that Trading Participants maintain robust systems and controls to manage their AOP systems effectively and comply with market integrity requirements. For instance, Rule 5.6.3 (item [9]) now mandates that Trading Participants must implement controls that enable the immediate suspension, limitation, or prohibition of AOP activities if they interfere with market efficiency or integrity. This includes the ability to suspend or cancel series of related Trading Messages or Orders in a Crossing System (item [7]). Furthermore, Rule 5.6.3(d) and (e) (item [7]) detail specific controls that must be in place for managing series of related Trading Messages and Orders that could potentially disrupt market operations. The obligations imposed on Trading Participants by this legislation are substantial. They must ensure their AOP systems meet the criteria outlined in Rule 5.6.3, which includes having direct control over automated filters and filter parameters (item [10]). Additionally, Trading Participants are required to have organisational and technical resources, arrangements, and controls in place that meet the specified requirements (items [11] and [12]). The legislation also mandates that Trading Participants must perform annual reviews of their AOP systems and obtain written representations from qualified personnel confirming compliance with the rules (items [27] to [29]). These annual reviews and representations must be documented and submitted to ASIC as part of the AOP Annual Notification (items [25] to [26]). Failure to comply with these obligations can lead to significant consequences. Breaches of the provisions outlined in this legislation can result in substantial penalties. For instance, failure to maintain adequate controls over AOP systems can attract a maximum penalty of $1,000,000 (item [10]). Similarly, failure to perform the required annual reviews and obtain the necessary written representations can result in penalties of up to $100,000 (items [28] and [29]). These penalties underscore the importance of strict compliance with the new rules to avoid severe financial and legal repercussions. Furthermore, the amendments introduce new definitions and terminology, such as "AOP Annual Notification" and "AOP Annual Review," to ensure clarity and consistency in compliance requirements.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Corporate Law & Governance
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.