ASIC Corporations (Securitisation Special Purpose Vehicles) Instrument 2026/175

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2026L00265 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

Explanatory Statement

 

ASIC Corporations (Securitisation Special Purpose Vehicles) Instrument 2026/175

This is the Explanatory Statement for ASIC Corporations (Securitisation Special Purpose Vehicles) Instrument 2026/175.

The Explanatory Statement is approved by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

Summary

  1.              ASIC Corporations (Securitisation Special Purpose Vehicles) Instrument 2026/175 (Instrument 2026/175) provides an exemption from the requirement to hold an Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence for insolvency-remote special purpose entities issuing certain securitisation products in specified circumstances.
  2.              Instrument 2026/175 substantively preserves the exemption previously provided under ASIC Corporations (Securitisation Special Purpose Vehicles) Instrument 2016/272 (Instrument 2016/272) (which itself continued the effect of ASIC Class Orders [CO 04/1526] and [CO 05/1270]).

3.      Schedule 1 to Instrument 2026/175 repeals Instrument 2016/272. Instrument 2016/272 would otherwise sunset under section 50 of the Legislation Act 2003 on 1 April 2026. 

Purpose of Instrument 2026/175

4. Part 7.6 of the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act) sets out the AFS licensing requirements for providers of financial services. Section 911A generally requires those carrying on a financial services business in Australia to hold an AFS licence. Subsection 766A(1) states that a person provides a 'financial service' if they (amongst other things):

(a) provide financial product advice;

(b) deal in a financial product; or

(c) provide a custodial or depository service.

5. This means that certain conduct engaged in by securitisation special purpose vehicles (SPVs), or the trustee of an SPV that is a trust, would, in the absence of an exemption, amount to the provision of financial services in Australia, attracting the AFS licensing requirements. Such conduct would include the SPV or the trustee of an SPV that is a trust:

(a) issuing securitisation products;

(b) dealing in derivatives transactions;

(c) dealing in foreign exchange contracts;

(d) dealing in the underlying assets of the trust that are financial products; and

(e) providing custodial services.

6. ASIC grants this relief to address concerns that a disproportionate burden would be placed on securitisation entities should they be required to hold an AFS licence.  Subsection 926A(2) of the Act provides that ASIC may exempt a person or a financial product or class of persons or financial products from all or specified provisions of Part 7.6 of the Act (other than Divisions 4 and 8).

7. In particular, in considering whether relief from the AFS licensing requirements should be granted, as stated in ASIC Regulatory Guide 167 AFS Licensing:  Discretionary Powers, it is an important factor for ASIC to consider whether clients for a financial service are exclusively wholesale clients. It is ASIC’s understanding (including from recent consultation with industry representatives) that the securitisation industry operates almost exclusively in the wholesale market.

Consultation

8. ASIC consulted publicly for 4 weeks on its proposal to remake the relief in Instrument 2016/272. It received three submissions. All submissions supported remaking Instrument 2016/272 on substantially similar terms.

Operation of Instrument 2026/175

Relief from the requirement to hold an AFS licence for issuing a securitisation product

9. Section 6 of Instrument 2026/175 defines “securitisation entity” as a body corporate, that:

(a) issues a securitisation product for the purposes of carrying on a business (the securitisation business) of managing, by way of a securitisation transaction, some or all of the economic risk associated with assets, liabilities or investments (whether the body assumes the risk from another person or creates the risk itself); and 

(b)  reasonably believes that it, or if it is the trustee of a trust—the trust, is an insolvency-remote special purpose entity according to criteria of an internationally recognised rating agency that are applicable to the entity’s circumstances; and 

(c)  raises all or substantially all of its funds by issuing securitisation products on terms that the funds raised would be applied in the securitisation business. 

10. A “securitisation product” is defined as either a debt instrument or an interest in a managed investment scheme.

11. Subsection 7(1) provides relief to a securitisation entity from the requirements in subsection 911A(1) to hold an AFS licence in respect of the provision of a financial service in the course of the securitisation business, provided that one of the four sets of criteria in subsection 7(2) is satisfied, as well as the additional criteria in section 8.

First set of criteria: Issuing a securitisation product

12. Paragraph 7(2)(a) provides relief where the service consists of issuing a securitisation product, where all of the following apply: 

  1.    the securitisation product relates to a securitisation transaction for managing some or all of the economic risk associated with assets held by the securitisation entity, and each other securitisation product issued by the securitisation entity relates to that securitisation transaction or another securitisation transaction for managing some or all of the economic risk associated with assets held by the securitisation entity; and
  2.    the issue is to a person who either: 

(i) holds an AFS licence; or 

(ii) is exempt from holding an AFS licence under Instrument 2026/175, ASIC Corporations (Foreign Financial Services Providers) Instrument 2025/798 or any exemption under paragraph 911A(2)(h) or (l) or subsection 926A(2) of the Act that includes reference to the exempted person complying with or reasonably believing that they comply with the regulatory requirements of a foreign jurisdiction.

Second set of criteria: Dealing in derivatives and foreign exchange contracts

13. Paragraph 7(2)(b) enables relief where the service consists of dealing in derivatives and foreign exchange contracts (or both) and all of the following apply:

(a) the service does not involve making a market for derivatives or foreign exchange contracts;

(b) the dealing is entered into for the purpose of managing a financial risk that arises in the ordinary course of a securitisation business; and

(c) the counterparty to the dealing is a person as a wholesale client.

Third set of criteria: Providing custodial or depository services for financial products on behalf of securitisation product holders

14. Paragraph 7(2)(c) enables relief for the provision of custodial or depository services in relation to financial products held by the securitisation entity as trustee for the holders of the securitisation products.

Fourth set of criteria: Dealing in financial products as trustee on behalf of securitisation product holders

15. Paragraph 7(2)(d) of Instrument 2026/175 provides relief for a service that is:

  1.    dealing on behalf of the holders of the securitisation products in financial products held by the securitisation entity as trustee for those holders of the securitisation products; and 
  2.    is not dealing by issuing or acquiring derivatives or foreign exchange contracts.

Further conditions of the relief

16. Section 8 provides that the exemptions from the requirement to hold an AFS licence in section 7 only apply where the securitisation entity satisfies both sets of criteria, as set out in paragraphs (a) and (b), below (as applicable): 

  1.    in the case of a financial service referred to in paragraph 7(2)(a), (b) or (d)—the securitisation entity: 

(i) provides the relevant financial service in accordance with financial product advice provided by an AFS licensee authorised to provide such advice in relation to the financial product to which the financial service relates; and 

(ii) has entered into a written agreement with the AFS licensee, under which: 

(A) the securitisation entity receives the financial product advice described in subparagraph (i); and 

(B) the AFS licensee has not by contract or otherwise excluded or limited (or purported to exclude or limit) its liability for any loss or damage resulting from any negligence by that licensee in providing the financial product advice to the securitisation entity; 

  1.    in the case of a financial service referred to in paragraphs 7(2)(a), (c) or (d)—the securitisation entity: 

(i) has not issued any securitisation products to a person who is a retail client; and 

(ii) has taken all reasonable steps to ensure that any securitisation products issued by the securitisation entity are not subsequently acquired by a person who is a retail client.

Repeal of Instrument 2016/272

17. Schedule 1 of Instrument 2026/175 repeals Instrument 2016/272.

Legislative instrument and primary legislation 

18. The matters contained in Instrument 2026/175 are designed to ensure the application of primary legislation keeps pace with technological and market developments not contemplated at the time the law was originally made and applies in a way consistent with the intended policy and the enabling provisions in the primary legislation.

19.  It will be a matter for the Government and for Parliament to consider whether the Act may need to be amended in the future to include the substance of Instrument 2026/175 in legislation.

Duration of Instrument 2026/175

20.    The duration of Instrument 2026/175 is 5 years. This period is appropriate to provide certainty for industry while the Government and Parliament decide whether to amend the primary legislation.

Legislative authority

21. Instrument 2026/175 is made under paragraph 926A(2)(a) of the Act.

22. Paragraph 926A(2)(a) provides that ASIC may exempt a person or class of persons from all or specified provisions of Part 7.6 of the Act (other than Divisions 4 and 8).

23. Under subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.

24. Instrument 2026/175 is a disallowable legislative instrument.

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights 

25. The Explanatory Statement for a disallowable legislative instrument must contain a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights under subsection 9(1) of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is in the Attachment.


Attachment

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

This Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  

ASIC Corporations (Securitisation Special Purpose Vehicles) Instrument 2026/175

Overview

1. ASIC Corporations (Securitisation Special Purpose Vehicles) Instrument 2026/175 (Instrument 2026/175) provides an exemption from the requirement to hold an Australian Financial Services licence, under Part 7.6 of the Corporations Act 2001, for certain securitisation entities issuing certain securitisation products that satisfy specified criteria.  Instrument 2026/175 repeals Instrument 2016/272.

Assessment of human rights implications

3. Instrument 2026/175 does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.             

Conclusion

4. Instrument 2026/175 is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview

ASIC Corporations (Securitisation Special Purpose Vehicles) Instrument 2026/175, enacted in 2026, addresses the gap in the regulatory framework concerning the licensing requirements for insolvency-remote special purpose vehicles (SPVs) that issue certain securitisation products. This legislative instrument, made under the authority of the Corporations Act 2001, aims to provide an exemption from the need to hold an Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence for SPVs operating in the securitisation market. The exemption is intended to alleviate the disproportionate burden that would otherwise be placed on these entities by requiring them to hold an AFS licence, especially since the securitisation industry predominantly serves wholesale clients. This instrument is designed to ensure that the application of the primary legislation remains relevant and effective in light of evolving market and technological developments, subject to potential future amendments by the Government and Parliament.

Scope and Application

ASIC Corporations (Securitisation Special Purpose Vehicles) Instrument 2026/175 provides a tailored exemption from the requirement to hold an Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence for specific securitisation entities issuing certain securitisation products under the Corporations Act 2001. This exemption applies to insolvency-remote special purpose vehicles (SPVs) that reasonably believe they meet the criteria set by internationally recognised rating agencies, provided they raise funds exclusively through the issuance of securitisation products. The instrument extends relief to these entities in specified circumstances, such as issuing securitisation products, dealing in derivatives and foreign exchange contracts, and providing custodial or depository services for financial products held on behalf of securitisation product holders. The exemption is contingent on certain conditions being met, such as obtaining financial product advice from an AFS licensee and ensuring that securitisation products are not issued to or acquired by retail clients. The instrument operates nationally and is designed to alleviate what ASIC considers a disproportionate burden on the securitisation industry, which predominantly serves wholesale clients. The instrument is a disallowable legislative instrument and has a duration of five years, providing industry certainty while allowing for potential legislative amendments.

Key Provisions

The ASIC Corporations (Securitisation Special Purpose Vehicles) Instrument 2026/175 provides exemptions from the Australian Financial Services (AFS) licensing requirements for certain securitisation entities that issue securitisation products under specific circumstances. This relief is aimed at entities that are insolvency-remote and issue products primarily to wholesale clients. Under section 6, a 'securitisation entity' is defined as a corporate body that issues securitisation products for managing economic risks associated with assets or investments and reasonably believes itself to be insolvency-remote according to internationally recognised criteria. The Instrument exempts these entities from the AFS licensing requirements if certain conditions are met, such as the products being issued to other entities exempt from holding an AFS licence or being wholesale clients, or if the products are not issued to retail clients and all reasonable steps are taken to prevent retail clients from acquiring them. The obligations imposed on securitisation entities by the Instrument include providing financial services in accordance with financial product advice from an AFS licensee, entering into a written agreement that ensures the AFS licensee's liability for any negligence in providing such advice, and taking reasonable steps to ensure securitisation products are not acquired by retail clients. Additionally, the Instrument mandates that securitisation entities must satisfy criteria such as the products being related to managing economic risks and the dealing being for the purpose of managing financial risk in the ordinary course of business. There are no explicit offences or penalties outlined in the Instrument itself. However, failure to comply with the conditions of the exemption could result in regulatory scrutiny and potential enforcement actions by ASIC under the Corporations Act 2001. These actions might include directives, fines, or other sanctions for non-compliance with financial services regulations. The Instrument, being a legislative instrument, is subject to disallowance by Parliament, which could lead to its nullification if deemed inappropriate or contrary to legislative intent.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Corporate Law & Governance
Financial Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Exemptions & Exclusions
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.