ASIC Corporations (Options: Bonus Issues) Instrument 2016/77

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2016L00346 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT for


ASIC CORPORATIONS (OPTIONS—BONUS ISSUES)

INSTRUMENT 2016/77

 

Prepared by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission

 

Corporations Act 2001

 

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) makes ASIC Corporations (Options—Bonus Issues) Instrument 2016/77 under section 741 of the Corporations Act 2001(the Act).

 

Paragraph 741(1)(a) of the Act provides that ASIC may exempt a person from all or specified provisions of Chapter 6D of the Act.

 

  1.          Background

 

Chapter 6D of the Act establishes the statutory regime applying to fundraising through the offer of securities for issue or sale in Australia. It addresses the circumstances in which a person offering securities for issue or sale must lodge a disclosure document with ASIC and the relevant form, content and procedural requirements applying to those disclosure documents. Chapter 6D also sets out certain prohibited conduct in relation to fundraising activity and outlines the circumstances in and extent to which persons may be liable for defective disclosure documents. Chapter 6D also provides certain statutory remedies for investors.

 

The statutory regime applying to fundraising through the offer of securities for issue or sale was substantially rewritten in March 2000 by the Corporate Law Economic Reform Program Act 1999 (the CLERP Act). The CLERP Act amended the Corporations Law (the Law) by repealing Part 7.12—which previously contained the fundraising provisions— and inserting  the new Chapter 6D. Chapter 6D of the Law was retained in substantially the same form with the enactment of the Act in 2001.

 

Since the implementation of the CLERP Act, ASIC has made a number of exemptions from, and modifications to, the fundraising provisions in Chapter 6D with a view to addressing certain technical issues and anomalies in relation to their operation. One of these class orders was Class Order [CO 00/1092] Application form relief for bonus issues of options.

 

ASIC has recently reviewed the policy underlying Class Order [CO 00/1092] as part of wider review of class orders relating to the fundraising provisions in Chapter 6D and considers that the relief in the class order is still both necessary and appropriate. Accordingly, ASIC has decided to reissue the relief underlying Class Order [CO 00/1092] in ASIC Corporations (Options—Bonus Issues) Instrument 2016/77.

 

The Legislation Act 2003 (the LA) provides for the periodic expiry of legislative instruments (‘sunsetting’) to ensure that they are kept up to date and only remain in force for as long as they are needed. Class Order [CO 00/1092], being a legislative instrument, was scheduled to eventually expire under the sunsetting provisions of the LA.

 

ASICs review of the policy underlying Class Order [CO 00/1092]—and subsequent decision to reissue the relief—has provided an opportunity to deal with this imminent expiry and ensure that the relevant relief will continue to be available.

 

Under ASIC Corporations (Repeal) Instrument 2016/171, ASIC has revoked Class Order [CO 00/1092] effective from the date that ASIC Corporations (Options—Bonus Issues) Instrument 2016/77 commences.

 

2.             Purpose of the instrument

 

This legislative instrument addresses minor and technical issues arising in relation to the operation of a certain procedural element of Chapter 6D in circumstances where a particular form of offer is made: a pro-rata bonus issue of options to existing members of a company for nil consideration. The relief afforded by this legislative instrument reduces regulatory burden and facilitates this type of offer being made in circumstances where the procedural requirements of Chapter 6D may otherwise preclude or significantly deter issuers from undertaking it.

 

An offer of securities for issue or sale needs—unless a relevant statutory exception applies—disclosure under Chapter 6D. An issuer who grants bonus options to existing shareholders pro-rata for nil consideration (but with consideration payable upon exercise of the option) is considered for the purposes of Chapter 6D to offer securities for issue. This is because—for the purposes of Chapter 6D— an option over securities is considered be a ‘security’ and the grant of a bonus option is considered to be an offer.

 

Accordingly, an issuer proposing to undertake a transaction of this type is required to prepare and lodge with ASIC a disclosure document in accordance with Chapter 6D.  In addition to specifying the form and content requirements for a disclosure document, Chapter 6D sets out the relevant procedure that must be adhered to when offering securities for issue or sale under a disclosure document. One particular procedural element relates to the issue or transfer of securities to an applicant for those securities under a disclosure document. Section 723 of the Act provides that securities may only be issued or transferred in response to an application form and in circumstances where the person issuing or transferring them has reasonable grounds to believe that the application form was included in, or accompanied by, the disclosure document (the application form requirement). The underlying policy of the application form requirement is to ensure that persons applying for securities under an offer have been provided with the disclosure document.

 

Under a pro-rata bonus issue of options to existing members of a company, the issuing company determines those persons to whom the options are to be issued on the basis of the composition of the company’s register of members at the record date specified in the offer. Those members are issued the bonus options—for which no consideration is payable—by virtue of and in proportion to their shareholding in the company rather than on the basis of a completed application form.

Accordingly, ASIC has provided relief from the application form requirement.

 

The integrity of the policy underlying the application form requirement is preserved by the drafting of the relief which is narrowly cast and only extends to the application form requirement, not the requirement to prepare and lodge a disclosure document and provide a copy of that disclosure document to members. Further, an issuer of pro rata bonus options to existing members for nil consideration holds certainty as to the persons to whom a disclosure document must be provided (as the issuer has this information in its register of members) and there is no risk of a person being issued securities without the benefit of a disclosure document, because the offer is not capable of being accepted by any person outside this specific category of persons.

 

Section 734 of the Act contains a general prohibition on advertising and publicising an offer or intended offer of securities before a disclosure document is lodged with ASIC. One of the exceptions to this general prohibition (contained in subsection 734(5)) requires an issuer—in order to qualify for that exception—to make certain statements regarding the completion of an application form that will be in or will accompany the disclosure document.  Because ASIC has given relief from the application form requirement, ASIC considers it appropriate to give additional relief such that an issuer relying on the application form relief will not be precluded from relying on the relevant exception in subsection 734(5) merely because an application form is not used for the offer.

 

3.             Operation of the instrument

 

ASIC Corporations (Options—Bonus Issues) Instrument 2016/77 operates to exempt bodies undertaking a pro-rata bonus issue of options for nil consideration from the requirements of subsection 723(1) of the Act to the extent that it only permits the issue of the options in response to an application form included in or accompanied by a disclosure document.

 

Practically, the exemption means that issuers do not need to include an application form with a disclosure document for such offers. Importantly, the instrument does not provide any exemption from the requirement to make the offer of pro-rata bonus options for nil consideration under a disclosure document.

 

ASIC Corporations (Options—Bonus Issues) Instrument 2016/77 also exempts bodies undertaking a pro-rata bonus issue of options for nil consideration from the advertising restriction in subsection 734(2) provided the relevant advertisement or publication includes certain statements drawing attention to the availability of a disclosure document. The precise nature of the statement required depends on whether the advertisement or publication is published before or after the disclosure document is lodged.

 


4.             Consultation

 

On 17 September 2015 ASIC released CP 239 Disclosure documents: Update to ASIC instruments and guidance (CP 239) seeking feedback on proposals to update and consolidate a number of regulatory guides relating to Ch 6D of the Act. CP 239 also sought feedback on proposals to reissue the legislative instruments associated with ASIC’s updated guidance (including Class Order [CO 00/1092]) and to make legislative instruments addressing some discrete policy issues. The consultation period closed on 27 November 2015.

 

ASIC received four submissions in response to CP 239. Details of the submissions are contained in REP 473 Response to submissions on CP 239 Disclosure documents: updates to ASIC instruments and guidance which is available on ASIC’s website at www.asic.gov.au.

 

Notwithstanding ASIC’s consultation, ASIC considers that ASIC Corporations (Options—Bonus Issues) Instrument 2016/77 is of a minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.


 

 

Overview

The ASIC Corporations (Options—Bonus Issues) Instrument 2016/77 was enacted under the authority of section 741 of the Corporations Act 2001, with the aim of addressing minor and technical issues related to the procedural requirements in Chapter 6D of the Act when companies offer pro-rata bonus issues of options to existing members for nil consideration. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) developed this instrument to streamline the regulatory process, reduce the burden on issuers, and ensure that the underlying policy of providing disclosure documents to applicants is upheld. The instrument exempts certain bodies from the application form requirement in subsection 723(1) of the Corporations Act 2001, while still requiring the lodgement of a disclosure document. Additionally, it provides relief from the advertising restriction in subsection 734(2) provided that certain statements about the availability of a disclosure document are included in advertisements. This instrument is a response to Class Order [CO 00/1092], which is set to expire under the sunsetting provisions of the Legislation Act 2003. This legislative instrument seeks to address the problem of overly burdensome regulatory requirements for companies offering pro-rata bonus issues of options to existing members for nil consideration. By exempting these companies from the application form requirement, it aims to facilitate the offer process while preserving the integrity of the disclosure document requirement. ASIC's consultation on the instrument resulted in minor changes and refinements, and the instrument is considered to be of a minor or machinery nature, not substantially altering existing arrangements. The policy objective is to provide a streamlined process for companies to offer bonus issues of options, while still ensuring that investors receive adequate disclosure.

Scope and Application

The ASIC Corporations (Options—Bonus Issues) Instrument 2016/77, made by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) under section 741 of the Corporations Act 2001, is designed to exempt certain entities from specific provisions of Chapter 6D of the Act. This Act pertains to the statutory regime for fundraising through the offer of securities for issue or sale in Australia. The instrument primarily targets entities conducting pro-rata bonus issues of options to existing members of a company for no consideration, thereby exempting them from the requirement to issue options only in response to an application form included in or accompanied by a disclosure document. Importantly, this exemption does not affect the necessity for such offers to be made under a disclosure document, ensuring that investors are still provided with the requisite disclosure. The instrument also provides relief from advertising restrictions, provided that the advertisement includes specific statements about the availability of the disclosure document. The exemption is geographically applicable to the Commonwealth of Australia and applies to any entities conducting pro-rata bonus issues of options as described. Exclusions and exemptions are narrowly defined to preserve the integrity of the policy underlying the application form requirement and to ensure the continued protection of investors. ASIC’s decision to reissue the relief in ASIC Corporations (Options—Bonus Issues) Instrument 2016/77 follows a review of the policy underlying Class Order [CO 00/1092], which was revoked under ASIC Corporations (Repeal) Instrument 2016/171. This review aimed to address technical issues and anomalies in the operation of Chapter 6D, specifically concerning the procedural element involving pro-rata bonus issues of options. The instrument ensures the relief remains available, thereby reducing regulatory burdens and facilitating the issuance of pro-rata bonus options under certain conditions, while maintaining investor protection through the continued requirement to prepare and lodge a disclosure document.

Key Provisions

The ASIC Corporations (Options—Bonus Issues) Instrument 2016/77, issued under the Corporations Act 2001, targets the technicalities of issuing pro-rata bonus options for nil consideration to existing members of a company. The instrument primarily operates under sections 723 and 734 of the Act. Section 723(1) generally requires that securities can only be issued or transferred in response to an application form included in or accompanied by a disclosure document. However, the instrument exempts entities conducting pro-rata bonus issues from this requirement, while still mandating that such offers be made under a disclosure document. Section 734(2) of the Act prohibits advertising or publicising an offer of securities before a disclosure document is lodged with ASIC. The instrument provides an exemption from this prohibition for pro-rata bonus issues, provided that the advertisement includes specific statements regarding the availability of the disclosure document. The instrument imposes specific obligations on entities issuing pro-rata bonus options. Firstly, they must still lodge a disclosure document with ASIC, ensuring that all members have access to the necessary information before the issue of options. However, these entities are exempt from including an application form with the disclosure document. Furthermore, if they choose to advertise or publicise the offer before lodging the disclosure document, they must include a statement that draws attention to the availability of the disclosure document. This ensures that while the procedural requirement of an application form is relaxed, the fundamental requirement of providing a disclosure document remains in place, preserving the integrity of investor protection provisions. There are no direct offences or penalties specified in the ASIC Corporations (Options—Bonus Issues) Instrument 2016/77 itself. However, any failure to comply with the broader obligations of the Corporations Act, such as not lodging a disclosure document or misleading investors, could result in significant penalties. Under the Act, entities may face civil penalties for breaches, including pecuniary penalties of up to $210,000 for individuals and $1,050,000 for bodies corporate. Additionally, contravening the advertising provisions could lead to actions under consumer protection laws, with potential penalties including fines and corrective notices. While the instrument itself does not introduce new penalties, non-compliance with the Act’s overarching requirements could still attract significant legal consequences.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Corporate Law & Governance
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Exemptions & Exclusions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.