EXPLANATORY STATEMENT for
ASIC CLASS RULE WAIVER [CW 16/0359]
Prepared by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Corporations Act 2001
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) makes ASIC Class Rule Waiver 16-0359 (this instrument) under subrule 1.2.1(1) of the ASIC Market Integrity Rules (ASX Market) 2010 (the Rules). Under subrule 1.2.1(1), ASIC may relieve any person or class of persons from the obligation to comply with a provision of the Competition Rules. Under Rule 1.2.3 ASIC may specifiy the period during which any relief from the obligation to comply with a provision of the Rules may apply.
This instrument amends ASIC Class Rule Waiver [14-1091].
- Background
On 27 October 2014, ASIC granted Class Rule Waiver [CW 14-1091], providing relief to Participants of the Market operated by ASX Limited (ACN 008 624 691) (ASX) from Rule 3.4.1 in relation to Derivatives Markets Contracts only, subject to certain conditions.
Reasons for granting the original Class Rule Waiver
On 5 August 2013, ASIC amended Rule 3.4.3 to address regulatory issues arising from recent market developments, including the growing number of Market Participants establishing and operating automated services (referred to as 'Crossing Systems') that match or execute orders of their clients otherwise than on an Order Book of an exchange market (see the ASIC Market Integrity Rules (ASX Market) Amendment 2013 (No. 2).
The Waiver was originally granted because Participants queried whether it was ASIC's intention for Rule 3.4.3(1)(b) to apply to Derivative Market Contracts, as well as Cash Market Products. Rule 3.4.3 refers to Market Transactions, which is defined as "a transaction for one or more Products, entered into on a Trading Platform or reported to the Market Operator under the Market Operating Rules." Further, "Product" is defined as a "Cash Market Product or a Derivatives Market Contract, as applicable." Rule 3.4.3(1)(b), by virtue of the definition of Product, does apply to Derivatives Markets Contracts.
The Class Rule Waiver was therefore granted to allow for consultation, particularly in relation to the intended operation of the rule, the need for IT development and time for that IT development to occur.
Reasons for extending the original Class Rule Waiver
The consultation in relation to Rule 3.4.3(1)(b) now forms part of a broader package of regulatory reform. As a result, an extension to the waiver was deemed necessary to allow sufficient time for the reform package to become operational.
2. Purpose of the instrument
This Class Rule Waiver varies [CW 14-1091] by extending the relief from the obligation to comply with the notification requirements in relation to Derivative Market Contracts only in subrule 3.4.3(1)(b) of the Rules until 30 June 2017. The current Class Rule Waiver expires on 30 April 2016 and was originally granted to allow ASIC to consult with stakholders in relation to:
(a) the operation of the notification requirements in subrule 3.4.3(1)(b); and
(b) allow sufficient time for any necessary IT development to occur before the Rule becomes operational in relation to Derviatives Market Contracts.
As the consultation forms part of a broader package of reform, further time is required to complete the consultation. This instrument will extend the expiration date of CW [14-1091] to 30 June 2017 by which time any necessary changes to the Rule can be made and Participants can complete, and test, IT systems necessary to comply with the rule.
3. Operation of the instrument
The instrument substitues the expiration date stated in paragraph 6 of [CW 14/1091] of "30 April 2016", with "30 June 2017".
4. Documents Incorporated by reference
The Class Rule Waiver [14-1091] which this instrument amends, and accompanying Explanatory Statement, can be found at: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2014L01425.
5. Consultation
ASIC did not formally consult on this Class Rule Waiver as circumstances have not changed since the granting of the original Class Rule Waiver [CW 14/1091]. Further, the instrument is minor and machinery in nature. A Regulation Impact Statement was not required for this instrument as it is minor or machinery in nature and does not alter the existing requirements for Market Participants.
This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.