ASIC Class Order [CO 13/1026]

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2013L01624 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

ASIC CLASS ORDER [CO 13/1026]

 

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Prepared by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission

 

Corporations Act 2001

 

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) makes Class Order [CO 13/1026] under paragraph 911A(2)(l) of the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act).

 

Paragraph 911A(2)(l) of the Act provides that a person is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence for a financial service they provide if the provision of the service is covered by an exemption specified by ASIC in writing and published in the Gazette.

 

1. Background

 

ASIC Regulatory Guide 176: Foreign financial services providers outlines when ASIC will grant conditional relief from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence to foreign financial services providers that provide financial services in Australia only to wholesale clients.

 

A foreign financial services provider that is regulated by the relevant regulator or regulators of the United Kingdom is one class of foreign financial services provider that falls within the policy of Regulatory Guide 176. ASIC Class Order [CO 03/1099] (the principal class order) gives effect to that policy.

 

As a result of legislative amendments made to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 of the United Kingdom (the FSM Act) by the Financial Services Act 2012 of the United Kingdom, which took effect on 1 April 2013, these foreign financial services providers are now regulated in the UK by either:

 

(a) the Financial Conduct Authority (the FCA); or

 

(b) both the FCA and the Prudential Regulation Authority (the PRA).

 

 

2. Purpose of the class order

 

The purpose of this class order is to update references in the principal class order to reflect the changes to the legislative regime in the United Kingdom, without effecting any substantive change to the underlying policy in ASIC Regulatory Guide 176.

 

3. Operation of the class order

 

This amending class order amends the principal class order in the following ways.

 

The former definition of Part IV Permission in the principal class order has been replaced with a new definition of Part 4A Permission. A Part 4A Permission is defined as a permission given under Part 4A of the FSM Act or having effect as if so given under that Part. This definition covers Part IV Permissions given by the former FSA that were grandfathered by transitional measures, as well as Part 4A Permissions given by the FCA or the PRA to bodies authorised for the first time on or after 1 April 2013.

 

A new definition of PRA is inserted in the principal class order. PRA is defined as the Prudential Regulation Authority of the United Kingdom. The PRA is the prudential regulator for deposit-takers (such as banks, building societies and credit unions), insurers and major investment firms. Under the FSM Act, a Part 4A Permission can be granted by either the FCA or the PRA on or after 1 April 2013.

 

There are bodies that are regulated by either the FCA, or by both FCA and the PRA. Bodies that are regulated by the FCA and the PRA are known as dual-regulated bodies.   A new definition of a ‘dual-regulated body’ is inserted in the principal class order. A ‘dual-regulated body’ means a body whose regulated activities in the United Kingdom include a PRA-regulated activity within section 22A of the FSM Act.

 

A new definition of an appropriate regulator is inserted in the principal class order. An appropriate regulator is defined as both the PRA and the FCA (for a dual-regulated body) or the FCA (for a body that is not dual-regulated body).

 

The principal class order will require bodies to provide ASIC with certain written undertakings and covenants in the form of deed, and written consents to the sharing of information between ASIC and the appropriate regulator. Depending on whether the body is a dual-regulated body, the appropriate regulator will be both the FCA and the PRA, or only the FCA.

 

A body that is currently relying on the principal class order, and is not a dual-regulated body (ie the relevant appropriate regulator of the body is the FCA), will not be required to provide new or amending deeds or written consents to ASIC as the existing deeds and written consents provided to ASIC will have satisfied the principal class order.

 

A body that is currently relying on the principal class order, and is a dual-regulated body (ie the relevant appropriate regulator of the body is both the FCA and the PRA), will be required to provide new or amending deeds or written consents to ASIC as the existing deeds and written consents provided to ASIC will not have satisfied the principal class order. A transitional provision is included in the amending class order to enable some lead time for dual-regulated bodies that are currently relying on the principal class order to provide new or amending deeds and written consents that reference both the FCA and the PRA. The transitional provision operates until 31 March 2014.  A dual-regulated body that fails to provide these new or amending documents to ASIC before 31 March 2014 will not be able to rely on the principal class order.    

 

The class order also makes consequential amendments to the definitions of ‘overseas regulatory authority’ and ‘UK regulatory requirements’ to include reference to both the FCA and the PRA.

 

 

4.  Consultation

 

ASIC consulted with our regulatory counterparts in the United Kingdom before making this amending class order, principally for the purposes of clarifying the scope and effect of the recent legislative changes in that jurisdiction. ASIC did not engage in further consultation as the amendments made to the principal class order  are of a minor and technical nature and do not substantially alter the existing policy settings as set out in ASIC Regulatory Guide 176.

 


 

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

 

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

ASIC Class Order [CO 13/1026]

 

This class order is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the class order

 

This class order amends ASIC Class Order [CO 03/1099] (the principal class order). The principal class order grants conditional relief from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence to UK-regulated financial services providers that provide financial services in Australia only to wholesale clients.

 

The amendments comprise updating definitional references in the principal class order to reflect the changes to the legislative regime in the UK, which took effect on 1 April 2013.

 

The definitions affected include ‘Part 4A Permission’ (which replaces ‘Part IV Permission’), ‘Financial Conduct Authority’ (the FCA), ‘Prudential Regulation Authority’ (the PRA), and other consequential changes to accommodate bodies that are regulated by the FCA and PRA.       

 

 

Human rights implications

 

This class order does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

 

This class order is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Overview

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) issued Class Order [CO 13/1026] under the Corporations Act 2001 to update references in the earlier ASIC Class Order [CO 03/1099]. The 2003 Class Order had provided conditional relief from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence to UK-regulated financial services providers that offer financial services in Australia exclusively to wholesale clients. The 2013 Class Order updates these references to align with legislative changes in the United Kingdom that took effect on 1 April 2013, under which the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) now regulate certain financial services providers. This update ensures consistency with the policy set out in ASIC Regulatory Guide 176, without altering the underlying policy. ASIC consulted with UK regulatory counterparts during the drafting process but did not engage in further consultation as the amendments were minor and technical. The Class Order is compatible with human rights, as it does not engage any applicable rights or freedoms.

Scope and Application

The ASIC Class Order [CO 13/1026] applies to foreign financial services providers that are regulated by the relevant authorities in the United Kingdom and provide financial services in Australia exclusively to wholesale clients. This class order is made under the Corporations Act 2001, and its purpose is to update the references in the principal class order to reflect the changes in the United Kingdom's legislative regime without affecting the underlying policy as outlined in ASIC Regulatory Guide 176. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it pertains to financial services provided within Australia. The Act does not specify any exclusions or exemptions, but it does provide a transitional period for dual-regulated bodies to provide new or amending deeds and written consents to ASIC. The application of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, although this class order itself is of a minor and technical nature. The class order is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised in the international instruments listed in the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011, as it does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of ASIC Class Order [CO 13/1026] update the definitional references in ASIC Class Order [CO 03/1099] to reflect changes in the United Kingdom's legislative regime, which took effect on 1 April 2013. Section 1 replaces the definition of 'Part IV Permission' with 'Part 4A Permission', encompassing permissions granted under Part 4A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSM Act), including those given by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) or the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) to bodies authorized on or after that date. Section 2 introduces new definitions such as 'PRA', 'dual-regulated body', and 'appropriate regulator', clarifying the regulatory landscape for UK-regulated financial services providers operating in Australia. The class order also updates definitions of 'overseas regulatory authority' and 'UK regulatory requirements' to include references to both the FCA and PRA. The obligations and requirements imposed by this class order primarily involve UK-regulated financial services providers that wish to continue providing financial services in Australia without holding an Australian financial services licence. These providers must comply with the conditions outlined in ASIC Regulatory Guide 176, including providing ASIC with certain written undertakings, covenants, and consents for information sharing. Specifically, dual-regulated bodies must update their existing deeds and written consents to reference both the FCA and PRA, while non-dual-regulated bodies will not need to provide new documents if their existing ones already satisfy the requirements. The transitional provision allows dual-regulated bodies until 31 March 2014 to update their documents; failure to do so will result in the loss of reliance on the principal class order. Offences, penalties, and consequences for breach under this class order are not explicitly stated in the document. However, any failure to comply with the conditions set out in the ASIC Regulatory Guide 176, such as not providing the required documents or consents to ASIC, could result in the provider losing the exemption from holding an Australian financial services licence. This would mean that the provider would need to apply for and obtain a licence to continue offering financial services in Australia, subject to the relevant regulatory requirements and oversight by ASIC. The specific penalties for non-compliance with the Corporations Act 2001, such as fines or imprisonment, would depend on the nature and severity of the breach and would be determined by a court or tribunal as per the relevant provisions of the Act.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Financial Services & Regulation
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Licensing & Registration
Consultation Requirements

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.