ASIC Class Order [CO 07/386]

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2007L01697 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

ASIC CLASS ORDER [CO 07/386]

 

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Prepared by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission

Corporations Act 2001

Paragraph 1020F(1)(a) – Variation; Paragraph 1020F(1)(c) – Declaration

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) makes Class Order [CO 07/386] Superannuation: Delivery of product disclosure for investment strategies —amendment under s1020F(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act).

Section 1020F(1)(a) provides that ASIC may exempt a person or class of persons from all or specified provisions of Pt 7.9 of the Act. Section 1020F(1)(c) provides that ASIC may declare that Pt 7.9 of the Act applies in relation to a person as if specified provisions were modified or varied.

1. Background

Section 1012IA applies to superannuation trustees (providers) who offer a choice of investment strategies to members (clients) where, if the client instructs the provider to follow a particular strategy, the provider will acquire accessible financial products on behalf of the client. The application of s1012IA to superannuation was deferred until 30 June 2007 (by ASIC Class Order [CO 03/1097] Deferral of s1012IA).

In August 2006, ASIC released Policy Statement 184 Superannuation: Delivery of product disclosure for investment strategies [PS 184] and made Class Order [CO 06/636] Superannuation: Delivery of product disclosure for investment strategies to give effect to the policy outlined in [PS 184]. Specifically, [CO 06/636]:

(a) removed duplication between multiple disclosure obligations;

(b) enabled providers to take responsibility for the information provided to clients about accessible financial products; and

(c) recognised that, in many cases, additional money will be invested in an accessible financial product at frequent intervals over a lengthy period of time and the disclosure obligations need to be appropriate for that situation.

In late 2006, superannuation trustees raised concerns about the practical implementation of [PS 184] and [CO 06/636].

2. Purpose of the class order

The purpose of [CO 07/386] is to address the implementation concerns raised by superannuation trustees by amending [CO 06/636] and to provide some additional transitional relief by amending [CO 03/1097].

[CO 07/386] amends [CO 06/636] in three main ways. It:

(a) provides an additional disclosure relief option (the integrated PDS option) to enable a provider to include information about accessible financial products included in available investment strategies in the same document as the Product Disclosure Statement for the superannuation product;

(b) modifies the test to determine whether the provider will be required to provide additional disclosure where additional acquisitions of an accessible financial product are being made; and

(c) provides alternative methods for providing updated disclosure depending on whether the accessible financial product is ‘open’ or ‘closed’.

[CO 07/386] modifies [CO 03/1097] by extending the transition period to not later than 1 July 2008.

3. Operation of the class order

Additional relief option: an integrated PDS

[CO 07/386] modifies the law to allow a provider to include the information that would be required to be in a Product Disclosure Statement about an accessible financial product in the same disclosure document as information about the superannuation product (i.e. to produce an integrated PDS): see s1013FB(2)(b) and (5)–(6). Under the integrated PDS option, the provider will be responsible for all the required disclosure information. The provider will prepare both the information about the superannuation product plus the information about an accessible financial product.

This means that providers have three options for providing disclosure about accessible financial products to clients. They may:

(a) prepare the information themselves in an accessible product PDS for one or more accessible financial products, or

(b) prepare the information themselves in an integrated PDS that combines information about the superannuation product with information about one or more accessible financial products in the one PDS; or

(c) give a client an accessible product PDS prepared by the issuer of the particular accessible financial product.

Content requirements for the superannuation entity's PDS

[CO 07/386] modifies the law to omit the condition in s1013FB(3)(a)(iv) requiring the provider to ensure that the superannuation entity’s PDS contains information that will allow a client to understand the differences between the rights of a person who purchases an accessible financial product directly as a retail client and the rights of a client where the provider acquires the product on behalf of a client.

Amendments to the relief for additional acquisitions

[CO 07/386] changes the test for when updated disclosure must be given to clients who make additional acquisitions of an accessible financial product on an ongoing basis from ‘defective’ (a concept linked to PDSs) to ‘materially adverse’ (a concept linked more closely with the ongoing disclosure required under s1017B and, therefore, not PDS-dependent): see s1017CA(1)(b). This change was made to deal with the concern that not all accessible financial products were ‘open’ to new instructions and thus would not necessarily have a current PDS, which meant that a PDS-based approach was not appropriate.

Providing updated disclosure

[CO 07/386] amends the way in which updated disclosure is to be provided under s1017CA(2) to distinguish between ‘open’ and ‘closed’ accessible financial products. An ‘open’ accessible financial product is an accessible financial product for which a provider will accept new instructions from a client to acquire that product for the client for the first time. A ‘closed’ accessible financial product is an accessible financial product for which a provider will not accept a new instruction from a client to acquire the product for the client for the first time, even though the provider might continue to invest in that product because of a standing instruction given by a client before the product was closed. Updated disclosure for an ‘open’ accessible financial product must be given by providing a copy of the current PDS (including a supplementary PDS, where relevant): see s1017CA(5)(b). Updated disclosure for a ‘closed’ accessible financial product may be given by providing information in a form other than in a PDS or, if there is a current PDS, by giving that PDS to a member: see s1017CA(5)(a).

[CO 07/386] also clarifies that:

(a) updated disclosure may be provided in the same way as disclosure under s1017B (i.e. in writing, electronically or in a way specified in the Corporations Regulations 2001); and

(b) updated disclosure is not required to be given where the client:

(i) has already received a PDS that contains all the required information: see s1017CA(3); or

(ii) has already received all the required information through a PDS and information provided under s1017B or continuous disclosure made under Chapter 6CA: see s1017CA(6)–(7).

Extended transition: amendment to [CO 03/1097]

[CO 07/386] further extends the delayed application of s1012IA until not later than 1 July 2008. All new superannuation trustees will need to comply from 1 July 2007. However, all current trustees will need to comply from the earlier of when they next issue a new complete PDS for the superannuation product after 1 July 2007, or 1 July 2008. The amended transition period will allow trustees to comply with s1012IA and take into account the compliance options offered.

4. Documents incorporated by reference

A Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) was prepared for [CO 06/636] (Legislative Instrument – F2006L02636) in August 2006. The changes made by this class order are within the scope of that RIS. A copy of the RIS is available on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments <www.comlaw.gov.au> and on the ASIC website <www.asic.gov.au/co>.

5. Consultation

ASIC undertook extensive consultation about the implementation of [PS 184] and [CO 06/636]. Public seminars were held in Sydney and Melbourne in November 2006 and ongoing targeted consultation took place between January and May 2007. ASIC has taken the comments made during the consultation process into account in revising [PS 184] and amending [CO 06/636] and [CO 03/1097].

Overview

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Class Order [CO 07/386], enacted under the Corporations Act 2001, addresses the practical implementation concerns raised by superannuation trustees regarding the delivery of product disclosure for investment strategies. Initially, ASIC issued Policy Statement 184 and Class Order [CO 06/636] to streamline the disclosure obligations for superannuation providers. However, in late 2006, concerns about the feasibility of these measures prompted ASIC to revise its approach. The purpose of Class Order [CO 07/386] is to provide additional transitional relief and amend the existing obligations to facilitate better compliance. This includes introducing an integrated Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) option, modifying the test for additional disclosures, and distinguishing between 'open' and 'closed' accessible financial products in the disclosure requirements. The class order also extends the transition period to 1 July 2008, offering more time for superannuation trustees to comply with the new obligations.

Scope and Application

The ASIC Class Order [CO 07/386] under the Corporations Act 2001 amends the existing regulations regarding the delivery of product disclosure for investment strategies in superannuation funds, focusing on the obligations of superannuation trustees, referred to as providers, when they offer investment strategies to their members. The Act applies to all superannuation trustees who offer investment strategies and thus must ensure their clients are provided with adequate disclosure of the products they are investing in. The changes introduced by [CO 07/386] are designed to address practical implementation concerns raised by these trustees. The class order provides additional disclosure options, modifies the test for when additional disclosure is required, and provides alternative methods for providing updated disclosure based on whether the financial product is 'open' or 'closed'. This class order extends the transition period for compliance, allowing current trustees until July 1, 2008, to comply with the new requirements, with new trustees needing to comply from July 1, 2007. The class order does not introduce any exclusions or exemptions but rather seeks to refine the existing obligations and provide practical options for compliance.

Key Provisions

The ASIC Class Order [CO 07/386], made under section 1020F(1) of the Corporations Act 2001, introduces key amendments to the regulatory framework governing the delivery of product disclosure statements (PDS) for investment strategies in superannuation products. Section 1020F(1)(a) of the Act allows ASIC to exempt a person or class of persons from all or specified provisions of Part 7.9 of the Act. Section 1020F(1)(c) enables ASIC to declare that Part 7.9 applies in relation to a person as if specified provisions were modified or varied. This class order primarily targets superannuation trustees (providers) who offer investment strategies to their clients (members), aiming to streamline and provide clarity to the disclosure obligations under section 1012IA. The obligations imposed by [CO 07/386] on superannuation trustees include the provision of clear and comprehensive disclosure about accessible financial products. Trustees now have three options for delivering this disclosure: they can prepare a separate PDS for the accessible financial product, prepare an integrated PDS that combines information about the superannuation product and the accessible financial product, or provide a PDS prepared by the issuer of the accessible financial product. Trustees are also required to ensure that the updated disclosure distinguishes between 'open' and 'closed' accessible financial products, with specific requirements for each type. Furthermore, the class order mandates that trustees provide updated disclosure only when it is materially adverse and not merely defective, reflecting a shift in the test criteria for such disclosures. Breach of the provisions outlined in [CO 07/386] can result in significant consequences. While the Explanatory Statement does not explicitly outline specific penalties, breaches of disclosure requirements under the Corporations Act 2001 can lead to both civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties may include fines and other monetary penalties, while criminal penalties can involve imprisonment, reflecting the serious nature of non-compliance with disclosure obligations. Trustees are therefore under a strict obligation to ensure their compliance with these provisions to avoid potential legal repercussions. In summary, [CO 07/386] introduces critical amendments to the disclosure requirements for superannuation providers, offering flexibility through the integrated PDS option and modifying the criteria for updated disclosure. These changes are designed to address practical implementation concerns raised by industry stakeholders, ensuring that trustees can effectively meet their disclosure obligations while providing clear and timely information to their clients.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Corporate Law & Governance
Instrument
Regulatory Instrument
Concepts
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Licensing & Registration
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.