Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Corporations Act 2001 — Paragraph 1020F(1)(a) — Variation
Under paragraph 1020F(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 the Australian Securities and Investments Commission varies Class Order [CO 03/1097] by in paragraph 2 omitting “31 December 2004” and substituting “30 June 2005”.
Dated this 10th day of November 2004
Signed by Brendan Byrne
as a delegate of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Overview
The Corporations Act 2001, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, was introduced to regulate corporations in Australia, providing a framework for financial products, financial services and markets, and ensuring transparency and accountability. The Act aims to protect consumers and investors by imposing obligations on corporations and other entities. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is responsible for administering the Act, with the power to make legislative instruments under it. One such instrument, F2006B01649, amends a specific class order to extend a deadline from 31 December 2004 to 30 June 2005, demonstrating the ongoing role of ASIC in interpreting and adapting the provisions of the Act to address emerging issues. This legislative instrument highlights the policy objective of ensuring that regulatory measures remain effective and relevant in a changing business environment.
Scope and Application
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission Corporations Act 2001, specifically under the legislative instrument F2006B01649, addresses the regulation and governance of corporations in Australia, applying to various entities, including companies, limited partnerships, and trustees of Australian public companies. This particular legislative instrument pertains to the modification of Class Order [CO 03/1097], adjusting the compliance deadline for certain obligations from 31 December 2004 to 30 June 2005. This alteration is geographically and jurisdictionally applicable throughout Australia, impacting entities and industries that fall under the purview of the Corporations Act 2001. The Act does not explicitly state exclusions or exemptions from this variation, but it is implicitly limited to the scope of Class Order [CO 03/1097]. The authority to extend or restrict the application of this Act through subordinate instruments is vested in the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, ensuring that the legislative framework remains adaptable to the evolving needs of the corporate sector.
Key Provisions
Under paragraph 1020F(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has the authority to vary certain Class Orders. Specifically, ASIC has exercised this power to amend Class Order [CO 03/1097]. The amendment in question concerns paragraph 2 of the Order, where the date “31 December 2004” has been omitted and replaced with “30 June 2005”. This means that the timeframe specified in the Order has been extended, allowing for additional time beyond the originally stipulated date.
The primary obligation imposed by this variation is on entities governed by Class Order [CO 03/1097], particularly those who must comply with the deadlines and requirements set out in the Order. By extending the date to 30 June 2005, ASIC has provided these entities with an additional period to meet their obligations under the Order. This could include filing specific documents, undertaking certain activities, or adhering to other regulatory requirements outlined in Class Order [CO 03/1097]. It is crucial for affected entities to take note of this variation and ensure they comply with the extended timeframe to avoid any potential regulatory issues.
Failure to comply with the varied provisions of Class Order [CO 03/1097] could result in significant consequences. Under the Corporations Act 2001, breaches of Class Orders can lead to both civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties may include fines and other monetary penalties as prescribed by the Act. Additionally, individuals found to have contravened the Order may face personal liability for any resulting losses. In more severe cases, criminal penalties could apply, potentially leading to imprisonment for directors or other responsible persons. The exact penalties depend on the nature and extent of the breach, but they can be substantial, highlighting the importance of compliance with the extended deadline.