ASIC Class Order [CO 04/1299]

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2006B01142 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Corporations Act 2001 — Paragraph 1020F(1)(a) — Variation

Under paragraph 1020F(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 the Australian Securities and Investments Commission varies Class Order [C0 03/237] by, under the heading “Interpretation”, omitting paragraph 2 and substituting:

2. materially adverse information” means information of a kind the inclusion of which in, or the omission of which from, a Product Disclosure Statement would render the Statement defective within the meaning of section 1021B;”.

Dated this 15th day of October 2004

 

 

Signed by Brendan Byrne
as a delegate of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission

Overview

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission Corporations Act 2001, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, was designed to address the need for robust regulation of financial markets and to protect investors and consumers within these markets. One of the critical provisions of this Act concerns the regulation of financial products and disclosure requirements, ensuring that investors receive comprehensive and accurate information. The legislative instrument F2006B01142, dated 15 October 2004, amends Class Order [C0 03/237] under the Corporations Act 2001 by varying the definition of "materially adverse information" within the context of Product Disclosure Statements. This adjustment aims to align the definition with the statutory requirement that a Product Disclosure Statement must not be defective, as outlined in section 1021B of the Act, thereby enhancing the clarity and effectiveness of investor information.

Scope and Application

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission Corporations Act 2001 applies to financial products and services within Australia, impacting a wide range of entities including financial institutions, investment firms, and product issuers. The Act's jurisdiction covers the entire Commonwealth of Australia, thereby ensuring uniform regulation across all states and territories. The legislative instrument F2006B01142 specifically addresses the interpretation of "materially adverse information" as it pertains to Product Disclosure Statements, which are required to be clear and accurate to prevent misleading investors. This variation to Class Order [C0 03/237] ensures that the definition aligns with the statutory requirement under section 1021B, which mandates that Product Disclosure Statements must not be defective. The Act does not specify exclusions or exemptions, but its application may be further refined through subordinate instruments that can provide additional clarity or detail regarding the implementation and enforcement of these provisions.

Key Provisions

The key provision of this legislative instrument (paragraph 1020F(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001) involves the variation of Class Order [C0 03/237], specifically in the “Interpretation” section. The change pertains to the definition of “materially adverse information” (paragraph 2). The original definition is omitted and replaced with a new one: “materially adverse information” means information of a kind the inclusion of which in, or the omission of which from, a Product Disclosure Statement would render the Statement defective within the meaning of section 1021B. This change aims to clarify and refine the criteria for what constitutes materially adverse information in the context of financial products. Under this amended definition, entities governed by the Act, such as financial institutions and product issuers, must ensure that any Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) they provide to clients or potential clients is free from material omissions or inclusions that could render the statement defective. This means that they are obligated to include all information that, if missing or inaccurately presented, would make the PDS ineffective or misleading. The definition ties directly to section 1021B, which outlines the requirements for a PDS to be considered adequate. Failure to comply with the amended definition and the requirements of a PDS can result in various legal consequences. Financial institutions and product issuers may face enforcement actions from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). The penalties for non-compliance can be significant, including fines and, in severe cases, criminal charges against individuals responsible for the breach. The maximum penalties for corporate entities can be substantial, reflecting the importance of accurate and comprehensive disclosure in the financial sector.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Corporate Law & Governance
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.