Approval of Care Recipients Amendment Principles 2002 (No. 1)
I, KEVIN JAMES ANDREWS, Minister for Ageing, make these Principles under subsection 96-1 (1) of the Aged Care Act 1997.
Dated 12 November 2002
KEVIN ANDREWS
Minister for Ageing
Contents
1 Name of Principles
2 Commencement
3 Amendment of Approval of Care Recipients Principles 1997
Schedule 1 Amendments
1 Name of Principles
These Principles are the Approval of Care Recipients Amendment Principles 2002 (No. 1).
2 Commencement
These Principles commence on gazettal.
3 Amendment of Approval of Care Recipients Principles 1997
Schedule 1 amends the Approval of Care Recipients Principles 1997.
Schedule 1 Amendments
(section 3)
[Do not delete: Schedule Part Placeholder
[1] Section 5.3, note
after
insert
[2] Section 5.7
substitute
5.7 Flexible care — extended aged care at home
(1) A person is eligible to receive flexible care in the form of extended aged care at home only if the person:
(a) is assessed under section 22-4 of the Act as requiring a high level of residential care; and
(b) prefers to receive extended aged care at home; and
(c) is able to live at home with the support of extended aged care at home.
(2) In this section:
extended aged care at home has the meaning given by section 15.6 of the Flexible Care Subsidy Principles 1997.
Overview
The Approval of Care Recipients Amendment Principles 2002 (No. 1) were enacted to address specific gaps in the existing aged care framework under the Aged Care Act 1997. These principles were introduced by the Minister for Ageing, Kevin James Andrews, and commenced upon gazettal. The primary objective of these amendments is to refine the eligibility criteria for receiving flexible care in the form of extended aged care at home, ensuring that it aligns with the needs and preferences of care recipients while maintaining the quality and appropriateness of care provided. The amendments aim to provide clearer guidelines and better support for individuals who require a high level of residential care but prefer to remain in their homes with the assistance of extended aged care services.
The Approval of Care Recipients Amendment Principles 2002 (No. 1) were made under the authority of the Aged Care Act 1997 by the Commonwealth Parliament, reflecting the legislative body's commitment to improving the aged care system. By incorporating these amendments, the government seeks to enhance the flexibility and responsiveness of care services, ensuring that they cater to the diverse needs and preferences of elderly individuals in Australia. This legislative instrument is a step towards a more comprehensive and inclusive aged care policy, aiming to offer high-quality care options that respect the autonomy and well-being of care recipients.
Scope and Application
The Approval of Care Recipients Amendment Principles 2002 (No. 1) applies to persons seeking to receive flexible care in the form of extended aged care at home under the Aged Care Act 1997. These Principles amend the Approval of Care Recipients Principles 1997 to introduce eligibility criteria for extended aged care at home, specifying that a person must be assessed as requiring a high level of residential care, prefer to receive care at home, and be able to live at home with the support of extended aged care at home. The amendment is part of the Commonwealth legislation, affecting the eligibility criteria for aged care recipients and thereby impacting the delivery of aged care services. The changes are designed to ensure that the provision of extended aged care at home is appropriate for those who need it and can benefit from it in their home environment. The scope of these Principles is national, as they are part of the Commonwealth's legislative framework for aged care. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions in the text provided, and the Principles do not reference any subordinate instruments extending or restricting their application.
Key Provisions
The Approval of Care Recipients Amendment Principles 2002 (No. 1) primarily focus on amending the existing Approval of Care Recipients Principles 1997. The key operative sections, particularly in Schedule 1, introduce new eligibility criteria for receiving flexible care in the form of extended aged care at home. Section 5.7 specifies that a person is eligible to receive flexible care at home if they require a high level of residential care, prefer to receive extended aged care at home, and can live at home with the support of such care. This is clearly delineated in Section 5.7(1) and further explained in Section 5.7(2), which refers to the definition of extended aged care at home as provided in Section 15.6 of the Flexible Care Subsidy Principles 1997.
The obligations and requirements imposed by these Principles on the parties or entities they govern include ensuring that assessments are conducted under Section 22-4 of the Aged Care Act 1997. Care providers must verify the eligibility of individuals for extended aged care at home based on the outlined criteria. This involves a thorough evaluation to confirm that the person requires a high level of residential care, expresses a preference for extended aged care at home, and can reasonably live at home with the necessary support. The onus is on care providers to maintain accurate and up-to-date records of these assessments to ensure compliance with the legislative requirements.
Failure to adhere to the provisions set out in these Principles can result in significant consequences. Although the specific penalties are not detailed within the text of the legislative instrument itself, breaches of the Aged Care Act 1997 and its associated regulations can lead to civil or criminal penalties. For example, non-compliance with the approval requirements could potentially result in fines, regulatory sanctions, or other legal actions. The severity of these consequences can vary based on the nature and extent of the breach, with more severe violations potentially leading to higher penalties or more stringent enforcement actions. It is essential for care providers to understand and comply with these requirements to avoid any legal repercussions.