APPOINTMENT OF THE TORRES STRAIT FISHERIES REGIONAL OWNERSHIP FRAMEWORK STEERING COMMITTEE AS A FORMAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
I, CHARLIE KADDY, Acting Chief Executive Officer, Torres Strait Regional Authority HEREBY APPOINT the Fisheries Regional Ownership Framework Steering Committee as a formal advisory committee under section 142M of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Act 2005.
Charlie Kaddy
Acting Chief Executive Officer
Torres Strait Regional Authority
08 November 2018
Overview
The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Act 2005 was enacted to address the need for a comprehensive legislative framework that recognises and protects the rights and interests of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. This Act was brought into force by the Australian Parliament, aiming to facilitate self-determination and provide a robust mechanism for the recognition of Indigenous rights and cultural heritage. The appointment of the Fisheries Regional Ownership Framework Steering Committee as a formal advisory committee under section 142M of this Act aims to ensure that the specific needs and aspirations of the Torres Strait Islander communities regarding fisheries are effectively represented and managed. The policy objective here is to support the sustainable management of fisheries resources while respecting and incorporating the traditional practices and knowledge of the Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Scope and Application
The appointment of the Fisheries Regional Ownership Framework Steering Committee as a formal advisory committee under section 142M of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Act 2005 signifies a targeted approach to managing and advising on fisheries within the Torres Strait region. This Act applies to the entities and individuals involved in the steering committee, tasked with providing expert guidance and recommendations to the Torres Strait Regional Authority. The geographic scope of this Act is specifically aligned with the Torres Strait region, an area of significant cultural and economic importance to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. While the Act establishes the framework for advisory roles and responsibilities, it does not explicitly state exclusions or thresholds beyond its designated scope. The application and extension of the Act’s provisions may be further detailed in subordinate instruments, which can provide additional clarity and operational guidelines for the committee's functions and interactions within the Torres Strait.
Key Provisions
The key provision of the Gazette C2018G00897 is the appointment of the Fisheries Regional Ownership Framework Steering Committee as a formal advisory committee under section 142M of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Act 2005 (section 1). This means the committee is now officially recognised and tasked with providing expert advice and recommendations on matters related to the Torres Strait Fisheries Regional Ownership Framework.
The obligations and requirements imposed by this appointment involve the committee's role in ensuring the effective implementation and management of the Torres Strait Fisheries Regional Ownership Framework. The committee is expected to collaborate closely with the Torres Strait Regional Authority and other relevant stakeholders to develop, review, and recommend policies, practices, and procedures that align with the objectives of the Framework. They are also required to report back to the Torres Strait Regional Authority with their findings and recommendations in a timely manner.
Failure to comply with the obligations set out in the appointment may result in various consequences. While the Gazette itself does not specify detailed penalties or sanctions for non-compliance, breaches of duties under the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Act 2005 can result in civil and criminal penalties. Under the Act, individuals found to have acted in breach of their duties can face fines and imprisonment. The exact penalties depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as the specific provisions of the Act that have been contravened.
It is important to note that the consequences of not fulfilling the advisory committee’s responsibilities could also lead to broader legal and administrative repercussions. For instance, the Torres Strait Regional Authority may face challenges in effectively managing the fisheries if the committee’s recommendations are not heeded. This could potentially undermine the objectives of the Torres Strait Fisheries Regional Ownership Framework and lead to legal challenges or disputes. Therefore, the committee’s role is crucial, and compliance with their obligations is essential to ensure the smooth operation and success of the Framework.