Appointment of Commissioner for the commission to conduct an inquiry into Terrence John Clark in respect of the deaths of Douglas Robert Wilson and Isabel Martha Wilson by engaging in activities in contravention to laws of the Commonwealth, in particular relating to the importation, exportation or possession of drugs

Administered by Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

Legislation au C2004Q01009 In force Prerogative Instrument

Legislation content

 

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

ELIZABETH THE SECOND, by the Grace of God Queen of Australia and Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth:

TO

 DONALD GERARD STEWART

GREETING:

BY these our Letters Patent issued in Our name by Our Administrator of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia on the advice of Our Federal Executive Council and in pursuance of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia, the Royal Commissions Act 1902 and other enabling powers, We appoint you to be a Commissioner to make inquiry into the following matters so far as they are matters connected with the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth and are relevant to the exercise and performance of the powers and functions of the Parliament and Government of the Commonwealth, namely—

(a) whether Terrence John Clark, a person mentioned in the Finding made on 29 August 1980 in the Coroner’s Court at Melbourne in respect of the deaths of Douglas Robert Wilson and Isabel Martha Wilson, engaged in activities involving contravention of laws of the Commonwealth, in particular laws relating to the importation, exportation or possession of drugs, and, if so—

(i) the extent and nature of such activities of Terrence John Clark and persons associated with him;

(ii) the identity and involvement of persons associated with Terrence John Clark;

(iii) the methods of operation of Terrence John Clark and persons associated with him; and

(iv) the use made by Terrence John Clark and persons associated with him of banking, financial and other institutions in connection with those activities;

(b) whether, in the course of, or in connection with, activities of a kind referred to in paragraph (a), Terrence John Clark or any person associated with him directly or indirectly made or offered any payment or inducement for, or in connection with, or endeavoured by means of a threat to procure, the disclosure by any Commonwealth or State officer, or any person who was formerly a Commonwealth or State officer, of information relating to the activities of Douglas Robert Wilson, Isabel Martha Wilson or any other person;

(c) whether, in connection with activities of a kind referred to in paragraph (a), Terrence John Clark or any person associated with him procured or received, directly or indirectly, from a Commonwealth or State officer, or any person who was formerly a Commonwealth or State officer, any information (including information relating to any statement made by Douglas Robert Wilson or Isabel Martha Wilson concerning the activities of Terrence John Clark or any person associated with him);

(d) whether Terrence John Clark or any person associated with him or acting on his behalf in any way unlawfully interfered with or unlawfully attempted to interfere with the course of justice in relation to offences against laws of the Commonwealth;

AND We declare that in these Our Letters Patent—

(e) the expression ‘drug’ means a narcotic or psychotropic substance or any plant or material from which such a substance is derived or may be produced; and

(f) a reference to a person associated with Terrence John Clark is a reference to a person who, in or in connection with activities of a kind referred to in paragraph (a)—

(i) was associated, either directly or indirectly, with Terrence John Clark; or

(ii) acted, either directly or indirectly, on behalf of Terrence John Clark.

 AND We require you to make such recommendations arising out of your inquiry as you think appropriate, including recommendations as to the method of enforcement of the criminal law and the legislative or administrative changes (if any) that are necessary or desirable in the light of the results of your inquiry:

 AND We declare that you are authorized to conduct your inquiry under these Our Letters Patent in combination with any inquiry into the same or related matters that you are directed or authorized to make by any Commission issued, or in pursuance of any order or appointment made, by any of Our Governors of Our States:

 AND We require you as expeditiously as possible to make your inquiry and, not later than 30 June 1982 or such later date as Our Governor-General may be pleased to fix, to furnish to Our Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia a report of the results of your inquiry and your recommendations.

WITNESS His Excellency the Honourable Sir Stanley Charles Burbury, Knight Commander of The Royal Victorian Order, Knight Commander of The Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, Knight of The Most Venerable Order of the Hospital of Saint John of Jerusalem, Administrator of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia.

Dated this 25th day of June 1981.

STANLEY BURBURY

Administrator

By His Excellency’s Command

IAN VINER

Minister of State for Industrial
Relations for and on behalf of the
Prime Minister

Overview

The Royal Commissions Act 1902 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for comprehensive investigations into matters of national significance. It provides the legal framework for establishing Royal Commissions, which are empowered to inquire into a wide range of issues that impact the peace, order, and good governance of the Commonwealth. The Act enables the appointment of Commissioners to investigate specific matters, make findings, and offer recommendations for legislative or administrative changes. In the context of the Letters Patent issued on 25 June 1981, the Royal Commission was tasked with investigating allegations concerning Terrence John Clark's involvement in drug-related activities and potential interference with justice. The policy objective was to ensure thorough examination and appropriate recommendations to enhance law enforcement and legislative measures in response to the findings.

Scope and Application

The Letters Patent issued under the authority of the Commonwealth of Australia, specifically through the Royal Commissions Act 1902 and other enabling powers, appoint Donald Gerard Stewart as a Commissioner to conduct an inquiry into various matters concerning Terrence John Clark, including but not limited to activities involving the contravention of Commonwealth laws relating to the importation, exportation or possession of drugs. This inquiry extends to examining the extent and nature of Clark's activities, the identity and involvement of persons associated with him, the methods of operation used by Clark and his associates, and the use of financial and other institutions in connection with those activities. Furthermore, the inquiry includes investigating whether Clark or his associates made or offered any payments or inducements for information from Commonwealth or State officers, or if they procured or received any information from these officers. The Commissioner is also tasked with determining whether Clark or his associates unlawfully interfered with the course of justice. The term 'drug' is defined to include narcotics or psychotropic substances and any plant or material from which such substances are derived or may be produced. The inquiry applies to any person associated with Clark, which encompasses anyone directly or indirectly connected with Clark's activities or acting on his behalf. The Commissioner is required to submit a report to the Governor-General by 30 June 1982, including recommendations for enforcement of criminal law and any legislative or administrative changes deemed necessary.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Letters Patent (sections 1-7) outline the scope of the inquiry to be undertaken by Donald Gerard Stewart, the appointed Commissioner. Section 1 appoints Stewart as a Commissioner to investigate specific matters related to Terrence John Clark, focusing on illegal activities, the involvement of other persons, methods of operation, and use of financial institutions. Section 2 further defines the scope by examining whether Clark or his associates influenced or attempted to influence Commonwealth or State officers for information. Section 3 investigates any interference with the course of justice by Clark or his associates. Section 4 provides definitions for key terms such as 'drug' and 'person associated with Terrence John Clark'. Section 5 authorises the Commissioner to combine this inquiry with any related inquiries under other commissions. Section 6 mandates that the Commissioner make recommendations based on the inquiry results, including suggestions for criminal law enforcement and legislative changes. Finally, Section 7 requires the Commissioner to submit a report to the Governor-General by 30 June 1982, or a later date if specified. The obligations and requirements imposed by the Letters Patent on the parties involved are significant. The Commissioner, Donald Gerard Stewart, must conduct a thorough and expeditious inquiry into the specified matters (section 1). This involves gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, and examining relevant documents to determine the extent and nature of Clark's activities and the involvement of other persons. The Commissioner must also assess whether Clark or his associates influenced Commonwealth or State officers for information or attempted to interfere with the course of justice (sections 2 and 3). Additionally, the Commissioner is required to make appropriate recommendations based on the findings of the inquiry (section 6). These recommendations may include suggestions for legislative or administrative changes, as well as methods for enforcing criminal laws. The Letters Patent also establish potential consequences for non-compliance with the Commissioner's findings and recommendations. While the Letters Patent themselves do not specify offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach, any illegal activities uncovered during the inquiry could lead to prosecution under existing laws. For example, if the investigation reveals that Clark or his associates engaged in drug-related offences, they could face charges under the Narcotic Drugs Act 1967 or the Customs Act 1901. Penalties for drug offences can vary widely, but may include substantial fines and imprisonment. Similarly, any interference with the course of justice could result in charges under the Crimes Act 1914, with potential penalties including imprisonment. The Letters Patent, however, do not detail these potential penalties within their text.

Legal classification tags

Instrument
Prerogative instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Delegated & Subordinate Legislation
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.