Appointment of Commissioner for the commission to conduct an inquiry into Australia’s Security and Intelligence Agencies

Administered by Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

Legislation au C2004Q00998 In force Prerogative Instrument

Legislation content

 

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

ELIZABETH THE SECOND, by the Grace of God Queen of Australia and Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth:

TO THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ROBERT MARSDEN HOPE, C.M.G.,
 Judge of Appeal, Supreme Court of New South Wales

GREETING:

WHEREAS it is desired to have a judicial review of the activities of Australia’s security and intelligence agencies, namely, the Australian Security Intelligence Organization, the Australian Secret Intelligence Service, the Defence Signals Directorate, the Joint Intelligence Organisation and the Office of National Assessments (hereinafter called “the agencies”):

NOW THEREFORE We do, by these Our Letters Patent issued in Our name by Our Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia on the advice of the Federal Executive Council and in pursuance of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia, the Royal Commissions Act 1902 and other enabling powers, appoint you to be a Commissioner to inquire into, and in relation to -

(a) the activities of the agencies, especially since the completion of the inquiry made by the Royal Commission appointed on 21 August 1974 to inquire into matters relating to the intelligence and security services of the Australian Government (hereinafter called the Royal Commission on Intelligence and Security), with particular reference to -

(i) the progress made in implementing Government decisions on the recommendations of the Royal Commission on Intelligence and Security and of the Protective Security Review;

(ii) whether the agencies have efficiently, effectively and properly served the interests of the Australian people and Government, including whether effective arrangements exist for the establishment of policies and priorities, for the co-ordination of their activities and for the oversight of their work;

(iii) whether any changes in existing law and practices are required or desirable -

(A) to ensure that the agencies are properly accountable to Ministers and the Parliament;

(B) in relation to keeping the Leader of the Opposition informed on matters relating to security and intelligence;

(C) to provide for proper safeguarding, including safeguarding against unauthorised publication, of intelligence, including information provided by foreign governments in confidence;

(iv) whether there is adequate provision for effective redress for any persons who may be unjustifiably disadvantaged by actions of the agencies;

(v) whether existing law enables effective oversight by the Auditor-General of the Australian Security Intelligence Organization and the Australian Secret Intelligence Service in financial matters;

(b) whether the activities of the Australian Security Intelligence Organization, especially since the completion of the inquiry made by the Royal Commission on Intelligence and Security, have been carried out in compliance with the law, in particular the Australian Security Intelligence Organization Act 1956, the Australian Security Intelligence Organization Act 1979, the Telephonic Communications (Interception) Act 1960 and the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979;

(c) further to the inquiry in relation to paragraphs (a) and (b) above, all the circumstances, including the actions of the Government, surrounding the expulsion from Australia of Mr Valeriy Nikolayevich Ivanov, First Secretary, Embassy of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and the involvement of Mr Harvey David Mathew Combe in those circumstances; and

(d) any other related matters to which the attention of the Commission is directed by the Prime Minister in the course of the inquiry:

AND We require you as expeditiously as possible to make your inquiry and to furnish to Our Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia -

(e) first and as soon as possible, a report of the results of your inquiry and recommendations in relation to the matters specified in paragraph (c); and

(f) a report or reports as soon as possible, and in any event not later than 30 June 1984, of the results of your inquiry and recommendations in relation to the matters specified, or referred to, in paragraphs (a), (b) and (d).

WITNESS His Excellency the Right Honourable Sir Ninian Martin Stephen, a member of Her Majesty’s Most Honourable Privy Council, Knight of the Order of Australia, Knight Grand Cross of The Most Distinguished Order of Saint Michael and Saint George, Knight Grand Cross of The Royal Victorian Order, Knight Commander of The Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, Knight of the Most Venerable Order of the Hospital of Saint John of Jerusalem, Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia and Commander-in-Chief of the Defence Force.

Dated this seventeenth day of May 1983.

Governor-General

By His Excellency’s Command,

Prime Minister

Overview

The Royal Commission on Intelligence and Security Act 1983 was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to address concerns regarding the oversight and accountability of Australia’s security and intelligence agencies. This Act was introduced to facilitate a comprehensive review of the activities of these agencies, particularly following the recommendations of the 1974 Royal Commission on Intelligence and Security. The primary objective of the Act was to ensure that the intelligence agencies operated efficiently, effectively, and within the legal framework, while also providing for proper oversight and accountability mechanisms. This included examining whether the agencies had efficiently served the interests of the Australian people and government, evaluating the need for changes in existing laws and practices to enhance accountability and safeguard intelligence, and assessing the adequacy of provisions for effective redress for individuals adversely affected by agency actions.

Scope and Application

The prerogative instrument appoints a Commissioner to review the activities of Australia's security and intelligence agencies, including the Australian Security Intelligence Organization, the Australian Secret Intelligence Service, the Defence Signals Directorate, the Joint Intelligence Organisation, and the Office of National Assessments. The review encompasses the progress made in implementing government decisions on the recommendations of the Royal Commission on Intelligence and Security and the Protective Security Review, the efficiency, effectiveness, and propriety of the agencies' service to the Australian people and Government, necessary changes to existing law and practices for proper accountability and safeguarding of intelligence, the adequacy of legal redress for those unjustifiably disadvantaged by the agencies, and the effectiveness of existing law in enabling financial oversight by the Auditor-General of certain agencies. Additionally, the review addresses the compliance of the Australian Security Intelligence Organization's activities with relevant legislation and the circumstances surrounding the expulsion of a Soviet Embassy official, including the involvement of an Australian citizen in those circumstances. The Commissioner is required to submit an initial report on the expulsion matter and subsequent reports on the broader inquiry findings by specified dates. The instrument does not explicitly outline exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, and its application is not extended or restricted by subordinate instruments.

Key Provisions

The primary sections of the legislation (sections 1(a)-(f)) establish the scope and purpose of the inquiry. Specifically, the Commissioner is appointed to review the activities of Australia's security and intelligence agencies, especially since the 1974 Royal Commission on Intelligence and Security. This involves examining the implementation of previous recommendations, the efficiency and effectiveness of the agencies, legal and procedural changes to enhance accountability and oversight, and the expulsion of Mr Valeriy Nikolayevich Ivanov. The Commissioner must submit an initial report on the Ivanov expulsion by an unspecified date, and a subsequent report on all other matters by 30 June 1984. The obligations under this legislation (section 1(e)-(f)) include conducting a thorough investigation and submitting detailed reports within the prescribed timelines. These reports must include findings and recommendations aimed at improving the agencies' operations and legal frameworks. The Act imposes several obligations on the Commissioner and the agencies. The Commissioner is required to diligently and promptly conduct the inquiry, ensuring that all relevant aspects are examined thoroughly. This includes interviewing relevant personnel, reviewing documents, and considering all evidence pertinent to the inquiry. The agencies, on the other hand, must cooperate fully with the Commissioner, providing all necessary information and access to records. They are also required to ensure that their activities are conducted in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. Non-compliance or obstruction could significantly impede the inquiry's effectiveness and lead to adverse consequences. There are potential civil and criminal consequences for breaches of the obligations imposed by the Act. While the legislation does not explicitly detail penalties for non-compliance, breaches of similar mandates in other contexts have resulted in significant consequences. For instance, obstruction of a judicial inquiry can lead to charges of contempt of court, which carries substantial fines and imprisonment. Additionally, failure to comply with a legal mandate can result in civil actions for damages, especially if harm is caused to individuals or entities due to such non-compliance. These potential repercussions underscore the seriousness with which the legislation treats the obligations placed on the Commissioner and the agencies.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
National Security Law
Instrument
Prerogative instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Enforcement Powers
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.