Appointment of Commissioner for the commission of inquiry into certain aspects of the British nuclear tests that were conducted in Australia during the period of 12 years commencing on 1 January 1952

Administered by Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

Legislation au C2004Q00993 In force Prerogative Instrument

Legislation content

 

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

ELIZABETH THE SECOND, by the Grace of God Queen of Australia and Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth:

TO:

THE HONOURABLE JAMES McCLELLAND
JILL FITCH
WILLIAM JAMES ALBERT JONAS

GREETING:

WE DO by these Our Letters Patent issued in Our name by Our Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia on the advice of the Federal Executive Council and in pursuance of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia, the Royal Commissions Act 1902 and every other enabling power, appoint you to be Commissioners to inquire, in relation to the British nuclear tests (hereinafter referred to as “the tests”) that were conducted in Australia during the period of twelve years commencing on 1 January 1952, into the following matters, namely -

(a) the measures that were taken before and at the time of the tests, and have since been taken, for the purpose of protecting persons in and about Australia and the External Territories against exposure to the harmful effects of ionising radiation and against contact with radioactive substances and other toxic materials used in or produced by the tests;

(b) whether the measures so taken were adequate for that purpose, having regard to the measures considered appropriate for the protection of health and the standards applicable, at the time of the tests as well as at the present time: and

(c) whether the health of persons in and about Australia and the External Territories was or has been adversely affected by reason of exposure to the harmful effects of ionising radiation or contact with radioactive substances or other toxic materials used in or produced by the tests:

AND, without restricting the scope of your inquiry or in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, We direct you -

(d) to inquire particularly into the following matters, namely:

(i) the management and conduct of the tests including the criteria for safe firing of the tests;

(ii) the arrangements made both at the time of the tests and afterwards to exclude unauthorized persons from areas that in relation to the tests were prohibited areas or restricted areas for the purposes of the Defence (Special Undertakings) Act 1952 or otherwise;

(iii) radiological and other health physics standards and practices associated with the tests;

(iv) atmospheric atomic fallout monitoring arrangements associated with the tests;

(v) the disposal within Australia of buildings, equipment and materials that were at the test sites;

(vi) the measures taken, both at the time of the tests and afterwards, to manage the test sites and

(e) in conducting your inquiry to have particular regard to the following persons, namely, members of the Australian Defence Force and civilians at the test sites, Royal Australian Navy personnel in the vicinity of the tests at Monte Bello Islands, Royal Australian Air Force personnel, including decontamination teams, involved in atomic cloud sampling and tracking operations and Aboriginals and other civilians in the general regions of the test sites:

AND, without restricting the scope of your inquiry, We further direct you, for the purposes of your inquiry, to have regard to the following documents;

(f) the reports of the Australian Ionising Radiation Advisory Council known as No. 2 of 1975, Nos. 4 and 5 of 1979, No. 7 of 1980 and No. 9 of 1983.

(g) the report entitled “Health of Atomic Test Personnel” prepared by the Department of Health in 1983;

(h) Final Report on Residual Radioactive Contamination of the Maralinga Range and the Emu Site by N. Pearce (Atomic Weapons Research Establishment Report No. 0-16/68);

(i) Report of the Expert Committee on the Review of Data on Atmospheric Fallout arising from British Nuclear Tests in Australia made to the Minister for Resources and Energy in May 1984;

(j) British Atomic Tests in Australia Chronology of Events 1950-1968 by Dr J.L. Symonds:

AND We request you -

(k) in respect of any particular matter that is, or becomes, in issue between the parties in proceedings in a court or before any other tribunal relating to the death or personal injury of any person alleged to arise out of the tests, to order that the evidence be taken in private if you consider that the taking of the evidence in public might directly affect the rights of a party to those proceedings; and

(l) where any part of your report under theses Our Letters Patent recites evidence the subject of an order referred to in paragraph (k), states conclusions or makes recommendations the publication of which would impinge directly on a particular matter in issue between the parties in such proceedings, to furnish that part as a separate report with a recommendation whether or not it should be published:

AND We further request you to order that evidence, being classified documents, or the contents of classified documents, of the Government of the United Kingdom, be taken in private unless that Government consents to the taking of that evidence in public and, where any part of your report under these Our Letters Patent contains such classified documents or recites the contents of such documents and that Government has not consented to publication of that part, to furnish that part as a separate report with a recommendation whether or not it should be published;

AND We appoint you the Honourable James McClelland to be the President of the said Commissioners:

AND We further direct that, for the purpose of taking evidence, two Commissioners, one of whom shall be the President, shall be sufficient to constitute a quorum and may proceed with the inquiry under these Our Letters Patent:

AND We declare that in these Our Letters Patent -

(m) the expression “British nuclear tests” includes the tests associated with the British nuclear tests known as the minor trials and the experimental programme; and

(n) the expression “test sites” means the sites of the British nuclear tests:

AND We further direct you to make such recommendations arising out of your inquiry as you think appropriate, including recommendations regarding the future management and use of the test sites:

AND We require you as expeditiously and on as informal a basis as possible to make your inquiry and, not later than 30 June 1985 or such later date as We may be pleased to fix, to furnish to Our Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia a report of the results of your inquiry and your recommendations.

WITNESS His Excellency the Right Honourable Sir Ninian Martin Stephen, a member of Her Majesty’s Most Honourable Privy Council, Knight of the Order of Australia, Knight Grand Cross of The Most Distinguished Order of Saint Michael and Saint George, Knight Grand Cross of The Royal Victorian Order, Knight Commander of The Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, Knight of the Most Venerable Order of the Hospital of Saint John of Jerusalem, Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia and Commander-in-Chief of the Defence Force

Dated this sixteenth day of July 1984.

Governor-General

By His Excellency’s Command,

Minister of State for Trade
for and on behalf of the
Prime Minister

Overview

The Royal Commissions Act 1902 established the framework for royal commissions in Australia, providing the authority for the Commonwealth Government to appoint commissioners to investigate specific matters of public importance. The Letters Patent issued by Queen Elizabeth II in 1984 appointed a Royal Commission to inquire into the British nuclear tests conducted in Australia between 1952 and 1963. The primary objective of this inquiry was to comprehensively assess the measures taken to protect individuals in and around Australia and the external territories from the harmful effects of ionising radiation and exposure to radioactive substances and other toxic materials resulting from the tests. Additionally, the Commission was tasked with evaluating the adequacy of these measures, both at the time of the tests and in the present context, and determining whether the health of individuals in these areas had been adversely affected by the tests. The Commission was also directed to investigate the management and conduct of the tests, including safety criteria, radiological standards, fallout monitoring, and the disposal of test site materials, among other specific matters.

Scope and Application

The Letters Patent establishes a Royal Commission to investigate the British nuclear tests conducted in Australia from 1 January 1952 to 31 December 1963, along with associated minor trials and experimental programmes. The scope of the inquiry is comprehensive, focusing on measures taken to protect individuals from the harmful effects of ionising radiation and toxic materials, the adequacy of these measures, and the health impacts on persons in Australia and its External Territories. The Commission is directed to examine the management and conduct of the tests, radiological standards, atmospheric fallout monitoring, disposal of materials, and the management of test sites. Special attention is to be given to the health and safety of Australian Defence Force members, Royal Australian Navy and Air Force personnel, and civilians, including Aboriginals, in the vicinity of the test sites. The inquiry is to be conducted expeditiously and informally, with the power to hold private hearings where necessary to protect the rights of parties in related legal proceedings and to handle classified information appropriately. The Commission is mandated to report its findings and recommendations by 30 June 1985, or an extended date set by the Commonwealth.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislation (sections (a) to (k)) outline the scope and objectives of the inquiry into the British nuclear tests conducted in Australia between 1952 and 1963. Specifically, section (a) requires the inquiry to examine the measures taken to protect individuals from the harmful effects of ionising radiation and radioactive substances during and after the tests. Section (b) directs the inquiry to assess whether the measures implemented were adequate at the time and by current standards. Section (c) mandates an investigation into whether the health of individuals was adversely affected by exposure to radiation or toxic materials from the tests. Additionally, sections (d) to (k) detail specific areas of inquiry, such as the management of the tests, exclusion of unauthorized persons from test sites, health physics standards, and fallout monitoring arrangements. The legislation imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Firstly, the Commissioners are tasked with conducting a thorough and comprehensive inquiry into the matters specified (section (a) to (k)). This includes examining the historical context, the adequacy of protective measures, and the health impacts on affected individuals. The Commissioners must also consider particular groups, including military personnel and civilians, who were exposed to the risks associated with the tests (section (e)). Furthermore, the inquiry must take into account specific documents and reports related to the tests (sections (f) to (j)). The Commissioners are further directed to ensure that sensitive evidence, particularly classified documents, is handled appropriately and that proceedings are conducted in a manner that respects the rights of parties involved in related legal proceedings (sections (k) and (l)). The legislation outlines potential consequences for non-compliance with its provisions. While the document does not explicitly state offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, the gravity of the inquiry and the sensitivity of the subject matter suggest that any failure to adhere to the directives could have significant legal and reputational implications. Non-compliance could potentially lead to legal challenges regarding the validity of the inquiry’s findings and recommendations, which might affect the outcomes of related legal proceedings. Additionally, the failure to adhere to the confidentiality and procedural directives could result in the inquiry being deemed ineffective or biased, undermining its purpose and the trust placed in its outcomes.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Environmental Law
Instrument
Prerogative instrument
Concepts
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Compliance Obligations
Enforcement Powers
Catchwords
Protecting persons against exposure to harmful effects of ionising radiation

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.