Apple and Pear Bounty Regulations 1938

Legislation au C1938L00018 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

STATUTORY RULES.

1938. No. 18.

 

REGULATIONS UNDER THE APPLE AND PEAR BOUNTY ACT 1937.*

I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations under the Apple and Pear Bounty Act 1937.

Dated this third day of February, 1938.

(SGD) GOWRIE.

Governor-General.

By His Excellency’s Command,

for Minister of State for Commerce.

 

Apple and Pear Bounty Regulations 1938.

Citation.

1. These Regulations may be cited as the Apple and Pear Bounty Regulations 1938.

Definition.

2. In these Regulations, “the Act” means the Apple and Pear Bounty Act 1937.

Manner of payment of bounty.

3. Bounty under the Act shall be paid by crossed cheque posted to the grower of the apples or pears.

Prescribed authorities.

4. The following authorities shall be prescribed authorities for the purposes of sub-section (2.) of section 6 of the Act:—

State.

Prescribed authority.

New South Wales

The Rural Bank of New South Wales.

Victoria.................

The Fruit Growers Relief 1936 Committee.

Queensland...............

The Director of Fruit Culture.

South  Australia

The Apple and Pear Bounty Committee.

Western Australia

The Superintendent of Horticulture.

Tasmania................

The State Fruit Board.

Prescribed officers.

5. Arrangements having been made under section 12 of the Act in relation to each of the States, the officer of the State specified in the following Table opposite to the name of each State shall be the prescribed officer of that State for the purposes of section 7 of the Act:—

State.

Prescribed officer.

New South Wales

The Officer in Charge of the Rural Industries Agency of the Rural Bank of New South Wales.

Victoria.................

The Chairman of the Fruit Growers Relief 1936 Committee.

Queensland

The Director of Fruit Culture.

South  Australia

The Chairman of the Apple and Pear Bounty Committee.

Western Australia

The Superintendent of Horticulture.

Tasmania................

The Secretary to the State Fruit Board.

 

* Notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on , 1938.

 

 

By Authority: L. F. Johnston, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra.

Overview

The Apple and Pear Bounty Regulations 1938 were established under the authority of the Apple and Pear Bounty Act 1937. Enacted by the Governor-General in Council, these regulations were designed to facilitate the payment of bounties to apple and pear growers across various states. The bounty payments, as stipulated in these regulations, are to be made via crossed cheques sent directly to the growers. This legislative instrument was introduced to ensure a structured and efficient method for distributing financial support to growers, addressing the need for a cohesive framework that accommodates the diverse agricultural practices and administrative structures present in different states. The regulations detail specific authorities and officers designated to manage the bounty payments in each state, reflecting a tailored approach to implementing the bounty system. By identifying the prescribed authorities and officers for each state, the legislation aims to streamline the process of bounty distribution, thereby supporting the overarching policy objective of providing financial assistance to apple and pear growers to enhance their productivity and economic viability.

Scope and Application

The Apple and Pear Bounty Regulations 1938 provide detailed provisions for the administration and enforcement of the Apple and Pear Bounty Act 1937, governing the manner in which bounties are paid to apple and pear growers across various states in Australia. The Regulations specify that the bounty, as outlined in the Act, is to be paid to growers via crossed cheques posted to their addresses. The application of these Regulations extends to all states of Australia, with each state designated a prescribed authority and officer responsible for the distribution of the bounty. For instance, in New South Wales, the Rural Bank of New South Wales is the prescribed authority, while the Officer in Charge of the Rural Industries Agency of the Rural Bank of New South Wales acts as the prescribed officer. Similar provisions are made for each state, ensuring a structured and state-specific approach to bounty distribution. These Regulations are applicable to all persons and entities involved in the apple and pear industries within the specified states, ensuring compliance with the bounty payment provisions as stipulated in the Act.

Key Provisions

The Apple and Pear Bounty Regulations 1938 (the Regulations) are an instrumental legislative instrument under the Apple and Pear Bounty Act 1937. The Regulations specify the manner of payment of bounty, prescribe the authorities and officers responsible for administering the bounty, and outline other procedural details. Bounty under the Act, as stated in regulation 3, shall be paid by crossed cheque posted to the grower of the apples or pears. This provision ensures that growers receive their bounty in a secure and verifiable manner. The Regulations impose several obligations and requirements on the parties and entities governed by them. For instance, regulation 4 prescribes the authorities in each state who are responsible for certain functions under the Act. These authorities include the Rural Bank of New South Wales, the Fruit Growers Relief 1936 Committee in Victoria, the Director of Fruit Culture in Queensland, and others. Similarly, regulation 5 designates specific officers in each state to act as prescribed officers for the purposes of the Act. These officers are tasked with carrying out various administrative functions related to the bounty payments. The Regulations also delineate the consequences for non-compliance. Although specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences are not detailed within the text of these Regulations, the overarching Act, the Apple and Pear Bounty Act 1937, would likely impose such measures. Typically, breaches of legislative instruments under agricultural acts could result in fines, administrative penalties, or other legal repercussions, depending on the severity and intent of the breach. The precise penalties would be outlined within the main Act, ensuring that parties governed by the Regulations are aware of the potential legal consequences of non-compliance.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Commercial Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Prescribed Authorities

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.