Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Amendment Instrument 2014 (No. 2)

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2014L00110 Rules Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Explanatory Statement Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Amendment Instrument 2014 (No. 2) amending the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Instrument 2007 (No. 1)

 

 

1. Purpose and operation of Anti-Money Laundering/CounterTerrorism Financing Rules (AML/CTF Rules) amending Chapter 21

 

  1. Section 229 of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act) provides that the AUSTRAC Chief Executive Officer (AUSTRAC CEO) may, by writing, make AML/CTF Rules prescribing matters required or permitted by any other provision of the AML/CTF Act.

 

Amendment to Chapter 21

 

2.                   These AML/CTF Rules amend Chapter 21 (issuing or selling a security or derivative) by providing an exemption from the obligations under the AML/CTF Act for reporting entities which provide designated services under item 35 of table 1 in subsection 6(2) of the AML/CTF Act in certain circumstances. 

 

3.                  The new exemption will only apply to the issue (but not sale, transfer or redemption) of a new interest in a managed investment scheme registered under section 601EB of the Corporations Act 2001 (registered MIS) which is not admitted to quotation on a financial market.

 

4.                  The exemption does not apply to interests in MISs which form part of a stapled security.  New definitions of ‘Australian market licence exemption’, ‘managed investment scheme’, ‘MIS service’, ‘participant’ and ‘registered managed investment scheme’ have been added.

 

5.                  The exemption relates to the following parties:

 

  • The issuer of the interest(s) in the MIS is a reporting entity as it will be providing an item 35 designated service.

 

It is noted that an issuer may have an agent acting on their behalf in relation to the issue of an interest in an MIS, for example, a Product Issuer Settlement Participant (PISP) who acts through the Clearing House Electronic Subregister System (CHESS).  As the principles of agency apply across the AML/CTF Act generally, a PISP could act on behalf of an issuer-entity, but the issuer would still be the reporting entity under the AML/CTF Act.

 

  • The customer of the item 35 designated service is the person to whom the interest in the registered MIS is issued.

 

  • The broker acting on behalf of a customer is a reporting entity as it would be providing an item 33 designated service as the broker would be acquiring an interest in the registered MIS in the capacity of an agent of a person.

 

For the exemption to apply, this item 33 reporting entity must be a ‘participant’ as defined by section 761A of the Corporations Act 2001.

 

  • The customer of the item 33 designated service is the person who has engaged the broker to act on their behalf in relation to the application for the allotment of an interest in the registered MIS.

 

6.                  In the above circumstances, the customer of reporting entity providing the item 35 designated service is also the customer of the reporting entity providing item 33 designated service.  Both reporting entities need to identify and verify and undertake various AML/CTF obligations in relation to the same customer.  The exemption avoids this duplication.

 

7.                  For the exemption to apply to the reporting entity providing the item 35 designated service, the following conditions need to be satisfied:

(1) The processing and settlement of the issue of the interest in the registered MIS will need to occur through a particular type of electronic platform or facility which can only be operated by the following persons:

(a)          a prescribed financial market; or

(b)          an operator of a financial market in respect of which an ‘Australian market licence exemption’ has been made; or

(c)          both of the persons specified in paragraphs (a) and (b).

(2) The customer of the item 35 designated service will need to have been provided with a designated service covered by the item 33 reporting entity.

(3)              The item 33 reporting entity must carry out an applicable customer identification procedure in relation to the customer and electronically confirm through the MIS platform, that this has been completed, prior to the item 35 reporting entity issuing the MIS interest to the customer.

 

8.                   The item 35 reporting entity will be exempt from the relevant AML/CTF obligations and result in the customer only needing to be identified once, rather than by both reporting entities.

 

9.                  The benefits of the exemption will not be available in relation to ‘pre-commencement customers’ of a reporting entity providing the item 33 designated service.  ‘Pre-commencement customers’ are existing customers of a reporting entity who were first provided with a designated service before 12 December 2007 – the date that section 28 of the AML/CTF Act commenced operation.  Sections 28 and 29 of the AML/CTF Act only require an applicable customer identification procedure (ACIP) to be undertaken in relation to a pre-commencement customer if a suspicious matter obligation arises, or has arisen, after 11 December 2007.

 

10.              Unless an ACIP is undertaken by an item 33 reporting entity in relation to its pre-commencement customer, the exemption will not apply and the item 35 reporting entity will be subject to the normal AML/CTF requirements in relation to that pre-commencement customer.

 

Statement of Compatibility with the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

11.              The Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 was passed on 25 November 2011 and came into effect on 4 January 2012.  It introduced a requirement for a Statement of Compatibility to accompany all new Bills and disallowable legislative instruments.

 

12.              The Statement of Compatibility for the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Amendment Instrument 2014 (No. 2) is included in this Explanatory Statement at page 6.  The AUSTRAC CEO, as the rule-maker of this legislative instrument, has stated that it is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

2. Notes on sections

 

Section 1

 

This section sets out the name of the instrument, i.e. the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Amendment Instrument 2014 (No. 2).

 

Section 2

 

This section specifies that Schedule 1 commences on the day after the instrument is registered.

 


Section 3

 

This section contains the details of the amendment:

 

Schedule 1 amends the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Instrument 2007 (No. 1).

 

Schedule 1

 

This schedule amends Chapter 21.

3. Notes on Items

Schedule 1

Chapter 21

Item 1

This item inserts a new subparagraph 21.3(4) which specifies a new exemption for reporting entities providing item 35 designated services from obligations under the AML/CTF Act.  The new exemption applies where such reporting entities issue a new interest in a registered MIS to a customer and certain other specified conditions are met.

Item 2

This item repeals all the definitions in paragraph 21.4.

Item 3

This item inserts a new replacement paragraph 21.4 containing definitions relevant to the interpretation of Chapter 21.  These definitions comprise the repealed definitions and new definitions for ‘Australian market licence exemption’, ‘managed investment scheme’, ‘MIS service’, ‘participant’ and ‘registered managed investment scheme’.

4. Legislative instruments

These AML/CTF Rules are legislative instruments as defined in section 5 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

5. Likely impact

The amendment to Chapter 21 will have a positive impact on any reporting entity that issues new interests in registered MISs.

6. Assessment of benefits

These AML/CTF Rules will provide regulatory relief to reporting entities issuing interests in registered MISs covered by the item 35 designated service as it will remove duplication of AML/CTF obligations in relation to a common customer of two separate reporting entities providing two separate designated services (item 35 and item 33 (an agent acquiring or disposing of a security and derivative)) which relate to the issue of an interest in a registered MIS.

7. Consultation

AUSTRAC published the amendments to Chapter 21 of the AML/CTF Rules for public consultation on the AUSTRAC website from 20 December 2013 to 17 January 2014.

AUSTRAC has consulted with the Australian Taxation Office, the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service, the Australian Federal Police, the Australian Crime Commission and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner in relation to these AML/CTF Rules.

8. Ongoing consultation

AUSTRAC will conduct ongoing consultation with stakeholders on the operation of these AML/CTF Rules.


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

 

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Amendment Instrument 2014 (No. 2)

 

This Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the legislative instrument

 

The Instrument amends Chapter 21 of the Anti-Money Laundering/Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules (AML/CTF Rules) by:

 

  • inserting a new exemption in relation to the issue of interests in registered managed investment schemes; and
  • updating the definitions in the chapter.

 

Human rights implications

 

It is considered that this Instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

 

This Instrument is therefore compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

 

 

 

John Lance Schmidt

Chief Executive Officer

Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre

Overview

The Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Amendment Instrument 2014 (No. 2) amends the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Instrument 2007 (No. 1) as part of ongoing efforts to refine and update the regulatory framework governing anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing in Australia. Enacted by the AUSTRAC Chief Executive Officer, the instrument aims to provide regulatory relief to reporting entities by introducing an exemption from certain obligations under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act) for entities providing designated services related to the issue of new interests in managed investment schemes. This amendment seeks to avoid the duplication of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing obligations that can arise when the same customer is involved with multiple reporting entities, thereby streamlining compliance processes while maintaining robust safeguards against financial crimes. The policy objective is to balance regulatory efficiency with the imperative of preventing illicit financial activities.

Scope and Application

The Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Amendment Instrument 2014 (No. 2) amends the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Instrument 2007 (No. 1), specifically addressing Chapter 21. This amendment provides an exemption from the obligations under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act) for reporting entities that provide designated services under item 35 of table 1 in subsection 6(2) of the AML/CTF Act when issuing a new interest in a managed investment scheme registered under section 601EB of the Corporations Act 2001, provided the interest is not admitted to quotation on a financial market. The exemption applies to the issuer of the interest, the customer, and the broker acting on behalf of the customer, provided the broker is a participant as defined by section 761A of the Corporations Act 2001. However, the exemption does not apply to interests in managed investment schemes that form part of a stapled security. For the exemption to be effective, certain conditions must be met, including the use of a specific electronic platform for processing and settlement, completion of applicable customer identification procedures by the broker, and electronic confirmation of these procedures through the managed investment scheme platform. The exemption aims to avoid duplication of AML/CTF obligations, ensuring that the customer is identified only once. However, the exemption does not extend to 'pre-commencement customers' of a reporting entity who were first provided with a designated service before 12 December 2007. This amendment is intended to benefit reporting entities involved in the issuance of new interests in registered managed investment schemes by streamlining their compliance with AML/CTF obligations. The amendment was subject to public consultation from 20 December 2013 to 17 January 2014, and AUSTRAC will continue to consult with stakeholders on the operation of these rules. The AUSTRAC CEO has stated that this Instrument is compatible with human rights, as it does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Key Provisions

The Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Amendment Instrument 2014 (No. 2) amends Chapter 21 of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Instrument 2007 (No. 1) by introducing a new exemption from the obligations under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act) for reporting entities that provide designated services under item 35 of table 1 in subsection 6(2) of the AML/CTF Act, specifically in the context of issuing a new interest in a managed investment scheme registered under section 601EB of the Corporations Act 2001 (registered MIS) that is not admitted to quotation on a financial market (section 1). This exemption, however, does not apply to interests in MISs which form part of a stapled security. The exemption applies under specific conditions, including that the processing and settlement of the issue must occur through a prescribed electronic platform or facility, and that the customer must have been provided with a designated service by a reporting entity providing an item 33 designated service, among other conditions (section 7). The exemption aims to prevent duplication of AML/CTF obligations in relation to the same customer by two separate reporting entities (section 6). The benefits of this exemption do not extend to 'pre-commencement customers' of a reporting entity providing the item 33 designated service, who were first provided with a designated service before 12 December 2007, unless an applicable customer identification procedure has been undertaken in relation to them (section 9). The Act imposes specific obligations on reporting entities subject to the exemption, including identifying and verifying their customers and undertaking various AML/CTF obligations. For the exemption to apply, the reporting entity providing the item 33 designated service must carry out an applicable customer identification procedure in relation to the customer and electronically confirm that this has been completed before the reporting entity providing the item 35 designated service issues the MIS interest to the customer (section 7). The exemption will only apply if the reporting entities are acting as agents for their customers in relation to the issue of an interest in the registered MIS, and the issuer of the interest in the MIS is a reporting entity as it will be providing a designated service (section 5). The customer of the item 35 designated service is the person to whom the interest in the registered MIS is issued, and the customer of the item 33 designated service is the person who has engaged the broker to act on their behalf in relation to the application for the allotment of an interest in the registered MIS (section 6). The Act does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach in the context of this exemption. However, breaches of the AML/CTF Act, including failure to comply with the obligations and requirements set out in the Act and the AML/CTF Rules, could potentially result in civil or criminal penalties. Under the AML/CTF Act, civil penalties for corporations can include fines of up to $210,000 for each offence, and criminal penalties can include fines of up to $525,000 for individuals and up to $2.625 million for corporations, along with imprisonment terms that vary depending on the offence (sections 260 and 261 of the AML/CTF Act). These penalties reflect the serious nature of non-compliance with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing obligations.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Anti-Money Laundering Law
Counter-Terrorism Financing Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Exemptions & Exclusions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.