Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Amendment Instrument 2011 (No. 5)

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2011L01705 Rules Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Explanatory Statement – Amendment of Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Instrument 2007 (No. 1)

 

 

1. Purpose and operation of Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules (AML/CTF Rules) amending Chapter 15

 

Section 229 of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act) provides that the AUSTRAC Chief Executive Officer (AUSTRAC CEO) may, by writing, make AML/CTF Rules prescribing matters required or permitted by any other provision of the AML/CTF Act.

Amendments to Chapter 15

 

Section 36 (Ongoing customer due diligence) of the AML/CTF Act specifies that a reporting entity must monitor its customers with a view to identifying, mitigating, and managing money laundering or financing of terrorism in accordance with the AML/CTF Rules.  Chapter 15 of the AML/CTF Rules sets out the requirements that reporting entities must follow in regard to ‘ongoing customer due diligence’ in relation to section 36.

Three major changes have been made to Chapter 15:

 

(a) paragraph 15.10 now specifies a reporting entity must undertake one or more of the actions specified in subparagraph 15.10(1)-(6), when that reporting entity has ascertained under its risk-based approach the money laundering/terrorism financing risk (ML/TF risk) is high or a suspicion has arisen for the purposes of section 41 (Reports of suspicious matters) of the AML/CTF Act. In addition, reporting entities are also now obliged to apply their enhanced customer due diligence program (ECDD) in a third circumstance as described in (b) below;

 

(b) ECDD must now be applied if a reporting entity is entering into or proposing to enter into a transaction and a party to the transaction is physically present in, or is a corporation incorporated in, a prescribed foreign country.  The term ‘prescribed foreign country’ is defined in the AML/CTF Act to mean ‘a foreign country declared by the regulations to be a prescribed foreign country for the purposes of this Act’ and relates to prohibiting or regulating the entering into of transactions with countries that may pose a substantial ML/TF risk;

 

(c) the insertion of a definition of ‘ultimate beneficial ownership’ which does not replace the definition of ‘beneficial owner’ contained in Chapter 1 of the AML/CTF Rules and instead only applies to the circumstances covered by Chapter 15.  The definition requires greater analysis to be to be carried out by reporting entities in order to ascertain the ultimate beneficial owner than is the case with the current definition of ‘beneficial owner’, however, this is considered appropriate in the high risk ML/TF situations specified in Chapter 15.

 

2. Notes on sections

 

Section 1

 

This section sets out the name of the instrument, i.e. the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Amendment Instrument 2011 (No.5).

 

Section 2

 

This section specifies that Schedule 1 commences on the day after it is registered.

 

Section 3

 

This section contains the Schedule which amends Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Instrument 2007 (No.1) as follows:

 

Schedule 1

 

This schedule amends Chapter 15.  

3. Notes on items

Item 1

This item omits the redundant sentence ‘Rules commencing on 12 December 2008’.

Item 2

The substitution of paragraph 15.1 accommodates the new references to paragraphs 84(2)(c) and 85(2)(c) of the AML/CTF Act.

Item 3

This item deletes the full stop at the end of subparagraph 15.9(2) and adds a semi-colon in its place, to allow for the addition of subparagraph 15.9(3) as described in Item 4.

 

Item 4

This item adds a third situation which will trigger a reporting entity’s enhanced customer due diligence program and relates to transactions with a prescribed foreign country.

Item 5

This item inserts amendments to paragraph 15.10 which make it mandatory that one or more of the actions must be carried out by a reporting entity under its enhanced customer due diligence program.  It is noted that reporting entities will also be required to submit a suspicious matter report if they form reasonable grounds for suspicion under section 41 (Reports of suspicious matters) of the AML/CTF Act.

Item 6

This item omits the redundant phrase ‘Terms’ from the Chapter.

Item 7

This item inserts the definition of ‘ultimate beneficial ownership’ into the Chapter.

4. Legislative instruments

These AML/CTF Rules are legislative instruments as defined in section 5 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

5. Likely impact

These AML/CTF Rules will have an impact on any reporting entity that provides a designated service covered by these AML/CTF Rules.

6. Assessment of benefits

The amendments to Chapter 15 will provide certainty to reporting entities in regard to what they must apply in regard to their enhanced customer due diligence programs, but also provide discretion to allow reporting entities to decide which measures are most appropriate for the situation which has triggered the application of the program.

7. Consultation

AUSTRAC has consulted with the Australian Taxation Office, the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service, the Australian Federal Police and the Australian Crime Commission in relation to these AML/CTF Rules.

On three separate occasions, AUSTRAC published on its website, draft amendments to Chapter 15.

8. Ongoing consultation

AUSTRAC will conduct ongoing consultation with stakeholders on the operation of these AML/CTF Rules.

Overview

The Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Amendment Instrument 2011 (No.5), enacted to address gaps in the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act), aims to enhance the robustness of ongoing customer due diligence requirements for reporting entities. This legislative instrument was introduced to provide greater clarity and specificity in the application of enhanced customer due diligence measures, particularly in high-risk scenarios involving money laundering and terrorism financing. The Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC), as the regulator, was tasked with making these amendments to the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Instrument 2007 (No.1), ensuring that reporting entities have clear guidelines for identifying and mitigating risks. The policy objective behind these amendments is to fortify the mechanisms by which reporting entities monitor and report suspicious activities, thus bolstering the overall effectiveness of Australia’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing framework.

Scope and Application

The Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Instrument 2007 (No. 1), as amended by the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Amendment Instrument 2011 (No. 5), applies to reporting entities that provide designated services and are subject to the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006. These entities must adhere to the requirements outlined in Chapter 15 of the AML/CTF Rules concerning ongoing customer due diligence, particularly in relation to identifying and mitigating money laundering or terrorism financing risks. The rules apply nationally and are enforced by the AUSTRAC Chief Executive Officer under the authority granted by the AML/CTF Act. The amendments primarily affect financial institutions and other designated entities, such as banks, credit unions, and financial service providers, requiring them to undertake specific actions under their enhanced customer due diligence programs in high-risk situations, including those involving prescribed foreign countries. The instrument does not explicitly state any exclusions or exemptions, but the application of the enhanced customer due diligence program is contingent upon the risk assessment of the reporting entity. The Act allows for further clarification and specification of rules through subordinate instruments.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Instrument 2007 (No. 1) focus on amending Chapter 15, which concerns ongoing customer due diligence (paragraphs 15.10 to 15.10(6)). Section 36 of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act) mandates that reporting entities must monitor their customers to identify, mitigate, and manage risks of money laundering or financing of terrorism, in accordance with the AML/CTF Rules. The amendments introduce specific actions reporting entities must undertake when the risk is high or a suspicion has arisen (paragraph 15.10(1)-(6)). Additionally, they must apply their enhanced customer due diligence (ECD) program under three circumstances: (a) when the risk is high, (b) when entering into a transaction with a party from a prescribed foreign country, and (c) when entering into a transaction with a corporation incorporated in a prescribed foreign country. The term 'prescribed foreign country' is defined in the AML/CTF Act to include countries declared as posing a substantial money laundering or terrorism financing risk. Furthermore, a new definition of 'ultimate beneficial ownership' has been inserted, applicable specifically to the circumstances covered by Chapter 15, requiring more thorough analysis by reporting entities. The obligations imposed on the parties governed by these AML/CTF Rules include maintaining ongoing customer due diligence measures as specified in Chapter 15. Reporting entities must monitor their customers to identify, mitigate, and manage risks of money laundering or financing of terrorism. They must undertake specific actions when the risk is high or when a suspicion has arisen, as outlined in paragraphs 15.10(1)-(6). Additionally, they are required to apply their ECD program when entering into transactions with parties or corporations from prescribed foreign countries. The definition of 'ultimate beneficial ownership' adds a layer of scrutiny, necessitating greater analysis to determine the ultimate beneficial owner in high-risk situations. The AML/CTF Act does not explicitly state offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches of these AML/CTF Rules in the explanatory statement. However, the AML/CTF Act generally provides for penalties for non-compliance, which can include substantial fines and imprisonment. For example, under section 13.1 of the AML/CTF Act, a person who contravenes a civil penalty provision is liable for a civil penalty of up to $210,000 for a corporation and $42,000 for an individual. In more severe cases, criminal penalties may apply, including fines of up to $210,000 for a corporation and $42,000 for an individual, along with potential imprisonment. The specifics of penalties are detailed within the AML/CTF Act itself, and breaches can lead to enforcement actions by AUSTRAC or other relevant authorities.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Anti-Money Laundering & Counter-Terrorism Financing
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Enforcement Powers
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.