Amendment Statement of Principles concerning sensorineural hearing loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 55 of 2022)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2022L00672 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

AMENDMENT Statement of Principles concerning

SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 55 OF 2022)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Amendment Statement of Principles concerning sensorineural hearing loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 55 of 2022).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) has determined, under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), Amendment Statement of Principles concerning sensorineural hearing loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 55 of 2022).

3.             This Instrument amends Statement of Principles concerning sensorineural hearing loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 98 of 2019) (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2019L01360) by:

  • replacing paragraph (n) in the definition of ‘specified list of chemical agents’ in the Schedule 1 Dictionary.

 

Day of Commencement

4.             This Instrument also specifies a day of commencement for the amendment in accordance with subsection 12(3) of the Legislation Act 2003.

Consultation

5.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to xylene as a factor in sensorineural hearing loss in the Government Notices Gazette of 6 July 2021, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

6.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

7.             The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to xylene as a factor in sensorineural hearing loss as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 6 July 2021.

References

8.             A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Amendment Statement of Principles No. 55 of 2022

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Sensorineural hearing loss

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have sensorineural hearing loss;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal; and
  • amends Instrument No. 98 of 2019 to ensure that it better reflects the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning sensorineural hearing loss.  

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Amendment Statement of Principles concerning sensorineural hearing loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 55 of 2022) was determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. The primary purpose of this legislative instrument is to amend the Statement of Principles concerning sensorineural hearing loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 98 of 2019) to better reflect the sound medical-scientific evidence regarding sensorineural hearing loss. This amendment facilitates the process for claimants in making claims for compensation and the Repatriation Commission and Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing these claims, as well as aiding in the review of such decisions. The legislative instrument promotes human rights by ensuring that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, thereby facilitating access to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health for veterans and other eligible persons. The Authority conducted an investigation into xylene as a factor in sensorineural hearing loss, which was advertised in the Government Notices Gazette on 6 July 2021, and invited submissions from various stakeholders. However, no submissions were received for consideration. This legislative instrument has been assessed as being compatible with human rights, as it does not derogate from any human rights and promotes the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents.

Scope and Application

The Amendment Statement of Principles concerning sensorineural hearing loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 55 of 2022) applies to veterans, current and former members of the Defence Force, and potentially their dependents, within the scope of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). It specifically amends the previously established Statement of Principles concerning sensorineural hearing loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 98 of 2019) to incorporate the most recent sound medical-scientific evidence, thereby ensuring that claimants can effectively seek and receive compensation and treatment for sensorineural hearing loss. This instrument facilitates the assessment and review of claims related to sensorineural hearing loss, thereby promoting the rights of veterans and their dependents to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised in the relevant international instruments, as it does not derogate from any human rights and actively promotes several rights of veterans, Defence Force members, and their dependents. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this legislative instrument is confined to the Commonwealth of Australia, given its application under the VEA and MRCA. The instrument does not explicitly state any exclusions or exemptions; however, it is tailored to align with the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning sensorineural hearing loss. Any further application or restriction of the principles outlined in the instrument may be extended or modified through subordinate instruments or regulations, which are not detailed in this particular amendment. The instrument is designed to ensure that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, thereby facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits for eligible claimants.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Amendment Statement of Principles concerning sensorineural hearing loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 55 of 2022) amend the previously established Statement of Principles concerning sensorineural hearing loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 98 of 2019). Specifically, it replaces paragraph (n) in the definition of ‘specified list of chemical agents’ in the Schedule 1 Dictionary, which now includes xylene as a factor in sensorineural hearing loss. This amendment is made under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and aims to better reflect the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning sensorineural hearing loss. This change facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) respectively. The Act imposes obligations on the parties or entities it governs by requiring the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) to determine the amendment in accordance with the available sound medical-scientific evidence. The Authority must also ensure that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, thereby promoting the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents. The determination of this instrument is also meant to facilitate the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. Any breaches of the provisions in the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 or the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 may result in civil or criminal consequences, depending on the nature of the breach. However, the specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breach in relation to this Amendment Statement of Principles are not explicitly stated in the document. It is essential to refer to the respective Acts and any relevant case law for information on the penalties associated with breaches of these Acts.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Statement of Principles
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Rights & Protections

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.