Amendment Statement of Principles concerning otitic barotrauma No. 16 of 2017

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2017L00011 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

AMENDMENT Statement of Principles concerning

OTITIC BAROTRAUMA

NO. 16 OF 2017

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Amendment Statement of Principles concerning otitic barotrauma No. 16 of 2017.

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) has determined, under subsections 196B(3) and (8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) Amendment Statement of Principles concerning otitic barotrauma No. 16 of 2017.

3.             This Instrument amends Statement of Principles concerning otitic barotrauma Instrument No. 36 of 2012 by replacing the definition of "a change in the ambient barometric pressure as specified" in clause 9.

Day of Commencement

4.             This Instrument also specifies a day of commencement for the amendment in accordance with subsection 12(3) of the Legislation Act 2003.

Consultation

5.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to otitic barotrauma in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 July 2016, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  Seventeen submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

Human Rights

6.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

7.             The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to otitic barotrauma as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 July 2016.

References

8.             A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Amendment Statement of Principles No. 16 of 2017

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Otitic barotrauma

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors linking particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have otitic barotrauma;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • includes a revised definition which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must exist before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, otitic barotrauma is connected with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person;
  • amends Instrument No. 36 of 2012; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning otitic barotrauma which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Amendment Statement of Principles concerning Otitic Barotrauma No. 16 of 2017 amends the Statement of Principles concerning Otitic Barotrauma Instrument No. 36 of 2012 under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislative instrument was introduced to address the evolving understanding of otitic barotrauma, ensuring that the definition of "a change in the ambient barometric pressure as specified" aligns with current sound medical-scientific evidence. The Repatriation Medical Authority, which determined this instrument, finalised the investigation into otitic barotrauma as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 July 2016. This amendment aims to facilitate claims and assessments by providing clearer criteria for eligibility and compensation, reflecting the latest scientific findings. The instrument is compatible with human rights, promoting the right to social security and the highest attainable standard of health for veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents.

Scope and Application

The Amendment Statement of Principles concerning Otitic Barotrauma No. 16 of 2017, determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, applies to eligible persons who have otitic barotrauma, which may include veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and other persons such as their dependents. This instrument serves to facilitate claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act by specifying the circumstances under which medical treatment and compensation can be extended. The amendment amends the previous Instrument No. 36 of 2012, reflecting recent developments in medical-scientific evidence regarding otitic barotrauma. The legislative instrument is designed to enhance the medico-scientific quality of outcomes for veterans and Defence Force members, ensuring that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent. This amendment is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from any human rights and promotes several rights, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Amendment Statement of Principles concerning otitic barotrauma No. 16 of 2017, as outlined in the Explanatory Statement, involve the amendment of the existing definition of "a change in the ambient barometric pressure as specified" in clause 9 of Instrument No. 36 of 2012. This amendment, as noted in subsection 196B(3) and (8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), is made to align the definition with the most current sound medical-scientific evidence regarding otitic barotrauma. This change aims to facilitate the assessment of claims for medical treatment and compensation by veterans and other eligible persons suffering from otitic barotrauma, thereby ensuring that the criteria for eligibility are based on the latest medical understanding. The Act imposes obligations on the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) to ensure that the determination of these principles is based on the best available medical-scientific evidence. The Authority is required to undertake investigations into conditions like otitic barotrauma and to consult widely with relevant stakeholders, including veterans' organisations, service personnel, and experts in the field. The Authority must also ensure that any legislative instrument determined is compatible with human rights, as outlined in the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. This includes a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights, which demonstrates that the instrument does not derogate from human rights and actively promotes the rights of veterans and their dependents. There are no explicit offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences detailed within the text for breaches of the provisions in this Amendment Statement of Principles. However, the Repatriation Medical Authority's role in ensuring the compatibility of these principles with human rights suggests a strong emphasis on compliance with established standards and ethical considerations. Any failure to adhere to the required medical-scientific evidence or to consult appropriately could potentially lead to legal challenges regarding the validity and fairness of the determinations made under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA).

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Human Rights Law
Consultation Requirements

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.