Amendment Statement of Principles concerning otitic barotrauma No. 15 of 2017

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2017L00009 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

AMENDMENT Statement of Principles concerning

OTITIC BAROTRAUMA

NO. 15 OF 2017

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Amendment Statement of Principles concerning otitic barotrauma No. 15 of 2017.

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) has determined, under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) Amendment Statement of Principles concerning otitic barotrauma No. 15 of 2017.

3.             This Instrument amends Statement of Principles concerning otitic barotrauma Instrument No. 35 of 2012 by replacing the definition of "a change in the ambient barometric pressure as specified" in clause 9.

Day of Commencement

4.             This Instrument also specifies a day of commencement for the amendment in accordance with subsection 12(3) of the Legislation Act 2003.

Consultation

5.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to otitic barotrauma in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 July 2016, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  Seventeen submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

Human Rights

6.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

7.             The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to otitic barotrauma as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 July 2016.

References

8.             A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Amendment Statement of Principles No. 15 of 2017

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Otitic barotrauma

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors linking particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have otitic barotrauma;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • includes a revised definition which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting otitic barotrauma with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person;
  • amends Instrument No. 35 of 2012; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning otitic barotrauma which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Amendment Statement of Principles concerning otitic barotrauma No. 15 of 2017, enacted in 2017, serves to amend the Statement of Principles concerning otitic barotrauma Instrument No. 35 of 2012. This legislative instrument was introduced to address the need for updated and more accurate definitions concerning otitic barotrauma, reflecting the most recent medical-scientific evidence. The Repatriation Medical Authority, under the authority granted by the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, determined this amendment to facilitate the assessment and determination of claims by eligible veterans and service personnel. The policy objective of this amendment is to ensure that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, thereby promoting the social security and health rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents. This amendment reflects the commitment to human rights by ensuring that the rights of persons with disabilities are upheld without discrimination.

Scope and Application

The Amendment Statement of Principles concerning otitic barotrauma No. 15 of 2017 applies to veterans and current and former Defence Force members who have suffered from otitic barotrauma, as well as to the Repatriation Commission, Veterans' Review Board, and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, who are responsible for assessing and reviewing claims related to this condition. The Act amends the existing Statement of Principles concerning otitic barotrauma Instrument No. 35 of 2012, reflecting new medical-scientific evidence. This instrument is a technical measure that enhances the quality of outcomes under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. It facilitates the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits for those suffering from otitic barotrauma, ensuring that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent. The instrument is compatible with human rights, promoting the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The instrument does not derogate from any human rights and ensures that these rights are exercised without discrimination.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Amendment Statement of Principles concerning Otitic Barotrauma No. 15 of 2017 include section 2, which establishes the determination of the instrument by the Repatriation Medical Authority (RMA) under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA). This instrument amends Statement of Principles concerning otitic barotrauma Instrument No. 35 of 2012 by updating the definition of "a change in the ambient barometric pressure as specified" in clause 9, ensuring that the instrument reflects the most current sound medical-scientific evidence. Section 4 specifies the day of commencement for the amendment, aligning with subsection 12(3) of the Legislation Act 2003. The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on the RMA to ensure that the determinations are based on sound medical-scientific evidence. The RMA must facilitate the process for claimants in making claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, as well as the assessment of these claims. Additionally, the RMA is responsible for ensuring that the revised definitions and principles are reasonably connected to the service circumstances of eligible individuals. This includes updating the definitions to reflect developments in medical-scientific evidence, thereby improving the quality of outcomes under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences mentioned in the text for breach of the provisions in the Amendment Statement of Principles concerning Otitic Barotrauma No. 15 of 2017. However, the importance of compliance with the updated definitions and principles is underscored to ensure that claimants and the Repatriation Commission can effectively assess and determine claims. The instrument's compatibility with human rights is also highlighted, ensuring that the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents are protected and promoted. The RMA's determination of the instrument finalises the investigation into otitic barotrauma, as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 July 2016.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Human Rights Law
Catchwords
Medical Treatment
Compensation

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.