EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
AMENDMENT Statement of Principles concerning
MALIGNANT NEOPLASM OF THE OVARY
(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 35 OF 2018)
VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986
MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004
- This is the Explanatory Statement to the Amendment Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the ovary (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 35 of 2018).
Background
2. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) has determined, under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) Amendment Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the ovary (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 35 of 2018).
3. This Instrument amends Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the ovary (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 9 of 2018) by correcting a typographical error involving a cross reference to a factor in the Statement of Principles. In particular, in subsection 10(2) this was an incorrect cross reference to subsection 9(11) when subsection 9(12) was intended.
4. This Instrument more accurately states the results of an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 19 October 2016 concerning malignant neoplasm of the ovary in accordance with section 196G of the VEA. The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.
Consultation
5. Prior to determining Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the ovary (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 9 of 2018), the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to malignant neoplasm of the ovary in the Government Notices Gazette of 19 October 2016, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants. The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field. No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.
Day of Commencement
6. This Instrument also specifies a day of commencement for the amendment in accordance with subsection 12(3) of the Legislation Act 2003.
Human Rights
7. This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.
Finalisation of Investigation
8. The determining of Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the ovary (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 9 of 2018) and Amendment Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the ovary (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 35 of 2018) finalises the investigation in relation to malignant neoplasm of the ovary as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 19 October 2016.
References
9. A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA. Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:
The Registrar
Repatriation Medical Authority
GPO Box 1014
BRISBANE QLD 4001
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)
Instrument No.: Amendment Statement of Principles No. 35 of 2018
Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Malignant neoplasm of the ovary
This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the Legislative Instrument
1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA). Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors linking particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.
2. This Legislative Instrument:-
- facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have malignant neoplasm of the ovary;
- facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
- corrects a typographical error involving a cross reference to a factor in the Statement of Principles; and
- amends Instrument No. 9 of 2018.
3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA.
Human Rights Implications
4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:
- the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
- the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
- the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
- the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
- ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).
Conclusion
This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.
Repatriation Medical Authority
[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.