Amendment Statement of Principles concerning ischaemic heart disease No. 34 of 2014

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2014L00305 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 34 OF 2014

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) has determined, under subsection 196B(3) & (8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) Amendment Statement of Principles Instrument No. 34 of 2014 concerning ischaemic heart disease.

 

2.             This Instrument amends Statement of Principles Instrument No. 90 of 2007, as amended by Instrument No. 44 of 2009, Instrument No. 97 of 2010, and Instrument No. 126 of 2011, concerning ischaemic heart disease by:

 

  • inserting new factors 6(pb) & 6(ffb) concerning 'physical activity', for acute myocardial infarction or sudden death from ischaemic heart disease only;

 

3.             This Instrument also specifies a date of effect for the amendment in accordance with subsection 12(1)(a) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

 

4.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to ischaemic heart disease in the Government Notices Gazette of 3 July 2013, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  One submission was received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

5.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

 

6.             The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to ischaemic heart disease as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 3 July 2013.

 

7.             A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:  Amendment Statement of Principles No. 34 of 2014

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Ischaemic heart disease

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have ischaemic heart disease;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • includes new factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must exist before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, ischaemic heart disease is connected with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person;
  • amends Instrument No. 90 of 2007, as amended by Instrument No. 44 of 2009, Instrument No. 97 of 2010, and Instrument No. 126 of 2011; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning ischaemic heart disease which have occurred since those earlier instruments were determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members; and
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 34 of 2014, enacted to amend the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, addresses the need to update the Statement of Principles concerning ischaemic heart disease. This legislative instrument was introduced by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the authority granted by the VEA. The primary policy objective is to ensure that the conditions for assessing ischaemic heart disease in veterans and current or former Defence Force members are consistent with the most recent sound medical-scientific evidence. This amendment facilitates both the assessment and review processes for claims related to ischaemic heart disease, ensuring that these processes are transparent, proportionate, and based on current medical understanding. It also reflects the Authority’s commitment to upholding human rights, including the right to social security and the right to the highest attainable standard of health, as recognised in international human rights instruments.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 34 of 2014 amends the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 by revising the Statement of Principles concerning ischaemic heart disease, specifically to incorporate new factors regarding physical activity linked to acute myocardial infarction or sudden death from ischaemic heart disease. This legislative instrument applies to veterans and current or former Defence Force members who are eligible to make claims under the VEA and MRCA, and it facilitates the assessment and determination of benefits related to ischaemic heart disease. It extends to the whole of Australia, being a Commonwealth instrument. The Authority sought submissions from relevant organisations and individuals, including the Repatriation Commission and experts in the field, before finalising this instrument. It is compatible with human rights, promoting various rights under international instruments, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The instrument reflects the latest medical-scientific evidence and aims to ensure that benefits are awarded in a reasonable, proportionate, and transparent manner.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislative instrument are subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the related instruments that amend the original Statement of Principles Instrument No. 90 of 2007, specifically concerning ischaemic heart disease. These sections establish the criteria for extending medical treatment and compensation to eligible persons with ischaemic heart disease, taking into account new factors such as physical activity related to acute myocardial infarction or sudden death from ischaemic heart disease. The instrument specifies the circumstances under which the disease is considered connected to eligible service, facilitating claims and assessments under both the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The obligations imposed by this legislation primarily fall on the Repatriation Medical Authority, which is responsible for determining the conditions and factors that qualify a person for benefits. The Repatriation Commission must assess claims in accordance with the new criteria set out in the instrument, and the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal are tasked with reviewing such decisions. The Authority must also ensure that the legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as recognised or declared in international instruments, which it has done by including a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights. There are no explicit offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined for breach of the provisions in this instrument. However, the authority of the Repatriation Medical Authority to determine these conditions is contingent on compliance with the legislative and human rights frameworks. Non-compliance with the criteria and conditions specified in the instrument could potentially result in challenges to decisions made by the Repatriation Commission, the Veterans' Review Board, or the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, but no specific penalties are detailed within the instrument itself.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Human Rights Law

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.