Amendment Statement of Principles concerning hypopituitarism No. 20 of 2013

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2013L00414 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 20 OF 2013

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) has determined, under subsection 196B(3) & (8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) Statement of Principles Instrument No. 20 of 2013.

 

2.             This Instrument amends Statement of Principles Instrument No. 77 of 2009 concerning hypopituitarism by revising the definition of "infiltration of the pituitary gland or hypothalamus due to a specified disorder" in clause 9.

 

3.             This Instrument also specifies a date of effect for the amendment in accordance with subsection 12(1)(a) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

 

4.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to hypopituitarism in the Government Notices Gazette of 12 December 2012, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

5.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

 

6.             The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to hypopituitarism as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 12 December 2012.


7.             A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 20 of 2013

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Hypopituitarism

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have hypopituitarism;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • includes a new definition for a factor which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must exist before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, hypopituitarism is connected with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person;
  • amends Instrument No. 77 of 2009; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning hypopituitarism which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members; and
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 20 of 2013 amends the Statement of Principles Instrument No. 77 of 2009 concerning hypopituitarism, revising the definition of "infiltration of the pituitary gland or hypothalamus due to a specified disorder" in clause 9. This amendment was determined under subsection 196B(3) and (8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and aims to facilitate claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The Authority finalised the investigation into hypopituitarism as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 12 December 2012, and the instrument is compatible with human rights as it promotes the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents, including the right to social security and an adequate standard of living. The instrument reflects recent developments in medical-scientific evidence concerning hypopituitarism and is designed to improve the quality of outcomes under the VEA and MRCA.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 20 of 2013, under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, amends Statement of Principles Instrument No. 77 of 2009 concerning hypopituitarism, revising the definition of "infiltration of the pituitary gland or hypothalamus due to a specified disorder" in clause 9. This legislative instrument is designed to assist claimants and the Repatriation Commission in assessing claims related to hypopituitarism, facilitate the review of such decisions, and incorporate the latest medical-scientific evidence. The Authority advertised its intention to investigate hypopituitarism in the Government Notices Gazette of 12 December 2012, inviting submissions from relevant organisations and individuals, though none were received. The instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes the human rights of veterans, Defence Force members, and their dependents by facilitating their access to social security and health benefits.

Key Provisions

The main sections of this legislation involve the determination of Statement of Principles Instrument No. 20 of 2013, which amends the previous Statement of Principles Instrument No. 77 of 2009 concerning hypopituitarism (sections 2 and 3). The authority to determine this instrument is derived from subsection 196B(3) and (8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA). The Act specifies a date of effect for the amendment in accordance with subsection 12(1)(a) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (section 3). The instrument aims to improve the quality of medico-scientific outcomes under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 by facilitating claims, assessments, and reviews related to hypopituitarism. The obligations imposed by this Act on the parties and entities it governs include the Repatriation Medical Authority's responsibility to advertise its intention to investigate in the Government Notices Gazette and to invite submissions from relevant organisations and individuals (section 4). The Authority must also ensure that the instrument is compatible with human rights as recognised in the International Instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 (section 5). Furthermore, the Authority must facilitate claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA, and include a new definition for a factor which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must exist before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, hypopituitarism is connected with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person (section 2). The consequences for breach of this legislation are not explicitly detailed in the provided text. However, given the nature of legislative instruments and the role of the Repatriation Medical Authority, non-compliance with the obligations and requirements could potentially lead to legal challenges or administrative penalties. The precise civil or criminal penalties are not mentioned, but breaches of legislative instruments typically result in administrative fines, legal disputes, or other remedies depending on the specific context and jurisdiction. The text does state that the instrument promotes human rights and does not derogate from any human rights, suggesting that compliance is expected to uphold these rights (section 4).

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Compliance Obligations
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.