Amendment Statement of Principles concerning diverticular disease of the colon (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 35 of 2020)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2020L00481 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

AMENDMENT Statement of Principles concerning

DIVERTICULAR DISEASE OF THE COLON

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 35 OF 2020)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Amendment Statement of Principles concerning diverticular disease of the colon (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 35 of 2020).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) has determined, under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), Amendment Statement of Principles concerning diverticular disease of the colon (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 35 of 2020).

3.             This Instrument amends Statement of Principles concerning diverticular disease of the colon (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 15 of 2016) (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2016L00265) by:

  • inserting a new factor in subsection 9(8a) concerning being treated with an immunosuppressive drug, for diverticular perforation, abscess and fistula only, for clinical onset;
  • replacing the existing factor in subsection 9(16) concerning being treated with an immunosuppressive drug, for clinical worsening;
  • inserting a definition of 'immunosuppressive drug' in Schedule 1  Dictionary in alphabetical order; and
  • deleting the existing definition of 'being treated with an immunosuppressive drug' in Schedule 1  Dictionary.

Day of Commencement

4.             This Instrument also specifies a day of commencement for the amendment in accordance with subsection 12(3) of the Legislation Act 2003.

Consultation

5.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to diverticular disease of the colon in the Government Notices Gazette of 26 February 2020, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  One submission was received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

6.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

7.             The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to diverticular disease of the colon as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 26 February 2020.

References

8.             A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Amendment Statement of Principles No. 35 of 2020

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Diverticular disease of the colon

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have diverticular disease of the colon;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • includes a new factor and a revised factor, and associated definition, which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting diverticular disease of the colon with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person;
  • amends Instrument No. 15 of 2016; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning diverticular disease of the colon which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Amendment Statement of Principles concerning diverticular disease of the colon (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 35 of 2020) was enacted to refine and update the existing legislative framework for veterans' entitlements and military rehabilitation compensation, specifically concerning diverticular disease of the colon. The Act aims to facilitate the assessment and approval of claims by incorporating the latest medical-scientific evidence. This amendment was determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, addressing the need to keep the legislative provisions aligned with current medical understanding and evidence. The policy objective is to ensure that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, thereby promoting the human rights of veterans and their dependents, including the right to social security and an adequate standard of living.

Scope and Application

The Amendment Statement of Principles concerning diverticular disease of the colon (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 35 of 2020) applies to veterans and their dependants under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This legislative instrument was determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority to improve the medico-scientific quality of outcomes concerning the recognition of diverticular disease of the colon as a condition connected to military service. The amendment introduces a new factor and revises an existing factor to reflect the most recent medical-scientific evidence concerning the disease, facilitating more accurate claims assessment and review. It applies nationally and is compatible with human rights as it promotes the rights of veterans and their dependants to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The amendment does not extend or restrict application through subordinate instruments, and there are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds beyond the medical-scientific evidence required to connect the disease with military service.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Amendment Statement of Principles concerning diverticular disease of the colon (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 35 of 2020) are set out in subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA). This Amendment Statement aims to incorporate recent medical-scientific evidence into the criteria for assessing claims related to diverticular disease of the colon under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). It introduces a new factor concerning treatment with an immunosuppressive drug for specific conditions, updates the definition of 'immunosuppressive drug', and removes the previous definition of 'being treated with an immunosuppressive drug'. The purpose is to facilitate more accurate and evidence-based assessments and claims regarding diverticular disease of the colon. The obligations and requirements imposed by this Act on the parties and entities it governs include the obligation for the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) to determine amendments to the Statement of Principles based on the most recent sound medical-scientific evidence. The Authority must ensure that the criteria for connecting diverticular disease of the colon with service are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent. This includes considering submissions from relevant organisations and individuals, as specified in section 196E of the VEA. Furthermore, the Authority must ensure that these amendments reflect the latest developments in medical-scientific evidence, thereby improving the quality of medico-scientific outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. The Amendment Statement of Principles does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches. However, the determination of this instrument is intended to finalise the investigation into diverticular disease of the colon, as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette. Any failure to adhere to the criteria set forth in this Amendment Statement could potentially lead to disputes or challenges in the assessment and determination of claims under the VEA and the MRCA. The primary focus is on ensuring that the process is fair, evidence-based, and aligned with human rights standards, rather than on imposing penalties for non-compliance. Nonetheless, any breaches in the legislative process or in the application of these principles could result in administrative or judicial review, leading to possible corrective actions or adjustments in the legislative framework.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Entitlements Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Human Rights Law

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.