REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY
INSTRUMENT NO. 105 OF 2007
VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986
MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004
EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING
- The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) has determined, under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) the attached Instrument No. 105 of 2007.
2. This instrument amends Statement of Principles Instrument No. 49 of 2006 concerning shin splints, determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA, by:
- inserting new worsening factors 6(d) and 6(e) concerning 'weight bearing exercise';
- inserting new worsening factor 6(f) concerning 'injury';
- re-numbering existing factor 6(d); and
- amending the wording in clause 7.
3. The Instrument specifies a date of effect for the Instrument in accordance with sub-section 12(1)(a) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
4. Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to shin splints in the Government Notices Gazette of 27 June 2007, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants. The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field. No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.
5. The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to shin splints as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 27 June 2007.
6. A list of references relating to the above condition is available, on written request, from the Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat.
Overview
The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 105 of 2007 amends Statement of Principles Instrument No. 49 of 2006 concerning shin splints under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. This legislative instrument was enacted to address issues related to the worsening factors of shin splints, specifically incorporating new factors such as weight-bearing exercises and injury, and re-numbering existing criteria. The Authority, exercising its powers under the Act, determined this instrument to conclude an investigation into shin splints, which was previously announced in the Government Notices Gazette on 27 June 2007. Although no submissions were received during the investigation, the Authority proceeded to finalise the instrument, thereby providing clarity and updated guidance on the worsening factors associated with shin splints for veterans' entitlements. The instrument's enactment aims to ensure fair and accurate assessments of shin splints for the purposes of veterans' rehabilitation and compensation.
Scope and Application
This legislation, titled "Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 105 of 2007", pertains to the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. The Authority amends Statement of Principles Instrument No. 49 of 2006 concerning shin splints, adding new worsening factors and re-numbering existing ones to improve clarity and comprehensiveness. The instrument affects all veterans and service personnel who might be impacted by the condition of shin splints, thus it applies to persons who have served in the Australian Defence Force and are currently receiving or seeking veterans' entitlements or military rehabilitation and compensation benefits. This legislation is of national reach as it is determined by the Commonwealth under the authority of the Repatriation Medical Authority. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions in the instrument itself, but the application may be subject to the specific terms and conditions outlined in the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. The instrument also specifies a date of effect in accordance with the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Key Provisions
The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 105 of 2007 amends the Statement of Principles Instrument No. 49 of 2006 concerning shin splints, as per subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA). The primary amendments include the insertion of new worsening factors 6(d) and 6(e) concerning 'weight bearing exercise' and new worsening factor 6(f) relating to 'injury'. Additionally, the existing factor 6(d) has been re-numbered, and clause 7 has been amended. These changes aim to provide a more comprehensive understanding and assessment of shin splints in the context of veterans’ entitlements.
The obligations imposed by this instrument on relevant parties include adhering to the new criteria for assessing shin splints, as outlined in the amended factors. This means that medical professionals and the Repatriation Commission must consider the new worsening factors when evaluating claims related to shin splints. The Authority’s decision to re-number existing factors and amend the wording in clause 7 necessitates updates in documentation and possibly training for those involved in the assessment process. It is essential that these updates are implemented to ensure compliance with the new legislative requirements.
Failure to comply with the provisions of this instrument may lead to various consequences. While the explanatory notes do not specify particular offences or penalties, non-compliance could potentially result in the misapplication of entitlements or the denial of legitimate claims. This could have significant ramifications for affected veterans, including financial and emotional distress. The Repatriation Medical Authority retains the authority to enforce compliance and may take appropriate action against entities or individuals found to be in breach of the new provisions.
It is also worth noting that the instrument is effective from the date specified in accordance with subsection 12(1)(a) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. This ensures that all relevant parties are aware of and can implement the changes in a timely manner. The Authority’s prior advertising of its intention to investigate and the circulation of notices for submissions indicate a commitment to transparency and stakeholder engagement in the legislative process. The lack of submissions during the investigation phase, however, suggests a need for continued communication and education regarding the new criteria for shin splints.