Instrument No.25 of 2002
Amendment of Statement of Principles
concerning
RENAL ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROTIC DISEASE
ICD-9-CM CODE: 440.1
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986
1. The Repatriation Medical Authority amends, under subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, Instrument No.33 of 1999 by:
- in paragraph 8 deleting the definition of “diabetes mellitus”.
2. The amendment made by this instrument applies to all matters to which Instrument No.33 of 1999 and section 120B of the Act apply.
Dated this Ninth day of January 2002
The Common Seal of the )
Repatriation Medical Authority )
was affixed to this instrument )
in the presence of )
KEN DONALD
CHAIRMAN
Overview
The Legislative Instrument No. 25 of 2002, an amendment to Instrument No. 33 of 1999, was enacted under subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 by the Repatriation Medical Authority. This amendment specifically targets the Statement of Principles concerning Renal Artery Atherosclerotic Disease, with the ICD-9-CM code 440.1. The primary change introduced by this instrument is the deletion of the definition of "diabetes mellitus" from paragraph 8. The purpose of this amendment is to refine and potentially expand the eligibility criteria for veterans seeking benefits related to renal artery atherosclerotic disease, thereby addressing any gaps in the existing definition of diabetes mellitus that might have impacted the assessment and approval of claims. The amendment applies to all matters governed by Instrument No. 33 of 1999 and section 120B of the Act, ensuring a consistent application of the revised criteria across relevant cases.
Scope and Application
The legislative instrument amends the Statement of Principles concerning Renal Artery Atherosclerotic Disease, impacting matters governed by Instrument No.33 of 1999 and section 120B of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. This adjustment specifically removes the definition of “diabetes mellitus” from the previously established criteria, potentially affecting the eligibility and assessment processes for veterans claiming benefits related to renal artery atherosclerotic disease. The Repatriation Medical Authority enacts these changes under the authority granted by subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, thereby influencing the scope of conditions considered for entitlement decisions. The amendment applies retroactively to all relevant matters, ensuring that any ongoing or future claims will be assessed under the revised criteria.
Key Provisions
The Legislative Instrument No. 25 of 2002 amends Instrument No. 33 of 1999 concerning renal artery atherosclerotic disease under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. This amendment, executed by the Repatriation Medical Authority, involves a specific modification to the definition section of the original instrument. In particular, the amendment removes the definition of "diabetes mellitus" from paragraph 8 of Instrument No. 33 of 1999. This alteration is intended to refine and possibly clarify the criteria for assessing conditions related to renal artery atherosclerotic disease, ensuring that the focus remains solely on the specified condition without the conflation of other related health issues such as diabetes mellitus.
The obligations imposed by this amendment on parties governed by the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 include the requirement to adhere to the revised definitions and criteria for medical assessments and entitlements. Medical practitioners, the Repatriation Medical Authority, and other relevant entities must ensure that their evaluations and determinations are consistent with the updated legislative framework. This entails a diligent review of existing cases and future claims to avoid misinterpretation or misapplication of the conditions for entitlement. Additionally, the amendment necessitates that all documentation and records be updated to reflect the changes, thereby maintaining a clear and consistent application of the law.
The Legislative Instrument No. 25 of 2002 does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breach within its text. However, under the general provisions of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, any non-compliance or improper application of the amended criteria could result in legal repercussions. These may include the denial of benefits or claims, potential audits, and investigations by the relevant authorities. Although the specific penalties are not detailed in this amendment, they would typically align with the broader legislative framework, which could involve financial penalties, corrective actions, or other administrative measures to ensure compliance with the Act.