Instrument No.54 of 2001
Amendment of Statement of Principles
concerning
PTERYGIUM
ICD-10-AM CODE: H11.0
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986
1. The Repatriation Medical Authority amends, under subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 Instrument No.46 of 2001 by:
- in clause 8, omitting the words “acquired cataract” wherever they appear in each of the definitions of “total lifetime UV damage factor”, “non-service UV damage factor”, “[MED cum (a,T)]”, “PAE” and “T” and inserting in their place the word “pterygium”.
2. The amendments made by this instrument apply to all matters to which Instrument No.46 of 2001 and section 120B of the Act apply.
Dated this Seventeenth day of July 2001
The Common Seal of the )
Repatriation Medical Authority )
was affixed to this instrument )
in the presence of )
KEN DONALD
CHAIRMAN
Overview
The Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) was enacted to provide for the financial and medical support of veterans, their spouses, and their children. The VEA addresses the need to compensate veterans for disabilities or conditions that arise from their service. One of the ways it does this is by specifying certain medical conditions that are presumed to be service-related if contracted by a veteran, thereby facilitating the entitlement process. The Repatriation Medical Authority, established under the VEA, amends the Statement of Principles concerning specific medical conditions to reflect the latest medical evidence and understanding. For example, in Instrument No.54 of 2001, the Authority updated the Statement of Principles to reflect that pterygium, rather than acquired cataract, is the relevant condition for calculating certain UV damage factors. The policy objective of these amendments is to ensure that the entitlements and benefits provided under the VEA accurately reflect the current medical consensus and the needs of veterans.
Scope and Application
The Legislative Instrument No.54 of 2001 under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 amends the Statement of Principles concerning pterygium, a condition previously coded under H11.0 in the ICD-10-AM. This amendment is specifically targeted at altering the definitions within the Act that pertain to various factors related to UV damage and pterygium, thereby replacing references to "acquired cataract" with "pterygium". These changes are applicable to all matters governed by Instrument No.46 of 2001 and section 120B of the Act. The Repatriation Medical Authority, which oversees the administration of veterans' entitlements, made these amendments to ensure that the definitions accurately reflect the condition being assessed for entitlement purposes. This legislative instrument thus extends the application of the Veterans' Entitlements Act to ensure that veterans with pterygium receive the appropriate recognition and benefits under the Act.
Key Provisions
The legislative instrument F2005B02510 amends the Statement of Principles concerning pterygium under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986. Specifically, it makes changes to Instrument No.46 of 2001, which previously addressed the condition of acquired cataract. The main operative sections of this amendment involve replacing the term "acquired cataract" with "pterygium" in several definitions related to the calculation of UV damage factors and other related terms. The changes are detailed in clause 8, where the specific definitions affected include "total lifetime UV damage factor", "non-service UV damage factor", "[MED cum (a,T)]", "PAE", and "T". This amendment ensures that the calculations and considerations for veterans' entitlements now focus on pterygium rather than cataracts.
The obligations and requirements imposed by this Act primarily concern the Repatriation Medical Authority and other governing entities. They must now apply the definitions and calculations as amended in their assessments of veterans' claims related to pterygium. This involves a re-evaluation of any claims that were previously assessed under the previous definition of acquired cataract to determine if they now qualify under the new criteria for pterygium. The changes necessitate that the Authority ensure all relevant personnel are adequately trained and informed about these modifications, and that any documentation or systems are updated accordingly to reflect the new definitions.
In terms of offences, penalties, or consequences, the legislative instrument does not explicitly detail specific penalties for non-compliance. However, given the nature of the amendments, any failure to adhere to the new provisions could potentially lead to incorrect assessments and entitlements being granted or denied. This could result in civil or administrative consequences for the Repatriation Medical Authority or other entities involved in the assessment process. The precise nature and extent of these consequences would be determined by the relevant provisions of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and any related administrative procedures or regulations.