Instrument No.75 of 2002
Amendment of Statement of Principles
concerning
MESANGIAL IGA GLOMERULONEPHRITIS
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986
- The Repatriation Medical Authority amends, under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the Act), Instrument No.63 of 2001 by:
- in paragraph 5, deleting the factors (c) and (d) and inserting in their place the following factors:
“(c) for primary mesangial IgA glomerulonephritis only, inhaling or having dermal exposure to:
(i) oxygenated organic solvents,
(ii) aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents, or
(iii) aromatic hydrocarbon solvents,
for an average of at least two hours per week over a period of at least twelve months before the clinical onset of mesangial IgA glomerulonephritis; or
(d) for primary mesangial IgA glomerulonephritis only, inhaling or having dermal exposure to:
(i) oxygenated organic solvents,
(ii) aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents, or
(iii) aromatic hydrocarbon solvents,
for an average of at least two hours per week over a period of at least twelve months before the clinical worsening of mesangial IgA glomerulonephritis; or”
B. in paragraph 8, deleting the definition of “organic solvents”.
2. The amendments made by this instrument apply to all matters to which Instrument No.63 of 2001 and section 120A of the Act apply.
Dated this Twenty-First day of November 2002
The Common Seal of the )
Repatriation Medical Authority )
was affixed to this instrument )
in the presence of )
KEN DONALD
CHAIRMAN
Overview
The Repatriation Medical Authority, under the authority vested in it by the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, has introduced an amendment to Instrument No.63 of 2001. This legislative instrument, numbered 75 of 2002, aims to refine the criteria for the recognition of mesangial IgA glomerulonephritis as a service-connected condition for veterans. By revising the specific factors that constitute qualifying exposure to certain solvents, the amendment seeks to more accurately identify instances of primary mesangial IgA glomerulonephritis that may be linked to service conditions. The changes include the insertion of new exposure factors and the removal of the previous definition of “organic solvents,” thereby ensuring that the legislative criteria remain relevant and specific to the medical condition in question. These amendments are intended to apply to all relevant cases under Instrument No.63 of 2001 and section 120A of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, thereby maintaining consistency and fairness in the assessment and recognition of veterans’ claims.
Scope and Application
The Legislative Instrument No.75 of 2002, issued by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, amends the Statement of Principles concerning Mesangial IgA Glomerulonephritis to refine eligibility criteria for veterans seeking compensation related to this condition. The Act applies to veterans who have been diagnosed with primary mesangial IgA glomerulonephritis and who were exposed to certain solvents prior to the onset or clinical worsening of their condition. Specifically, the instrument specifies exposure to oxygenated organic solvents, aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents, or aromatic hydrocarbon solvents for a minimum of two hours per week over a period of twelve months before the clinical onset or worsening of the disease. These amendments extend to all matters governed by the original Instrument No.63 of 2001 and section 120A of the Act, thereby encompassing all relevant veterans and their claims. This legislative amendment does not specify exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds beyond those already outlined in the original Act and its previous amendments.
Key Provisions
The legislative instrument amends Instrument No.63 of 2001 concerning the Statement of Principles for mesangial IgA glomerulonephritis under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986. Specifically, it modifies the factors that can be considered for diagnosing primary mesangial IgA glomerulonephritis, removing the previous factors (c) and (d) and replacing them with new criteria (section B(1)). These new criteria involve exposure to certain types of solvents—oxygenated organic solvents, aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents, and aromatic hydrocarbon solvents—for specific durations and frequencies before either the onset or worsening of the condition.
Under the new provisions, eligible exposure to these solvents must occur for an average of at least two hours per week over a period of at least twelve months. This requirement applies exclusively to primary mesangial IgA glomerulonephritis, meaning that these exposure criteria do not extend to other forms of the condition. Additionally, the instrument removes the definition of "organic solvents" from paragraph 8, which suggests that the interpretation of these terms might be subject to further clarification or reliance on general understanding in the context of the legislation.
The amendments imposed by this instrument are comprehensive, applying to all matters governed by Instrument No.63 of 2001 and section 120A of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (section 2). These changes mean that veterans seeking recognition or compensation for mesangial IgA glomerulonephritis will need to meet the new criteria regarding solvent exposure to qualify for entitlements.
In terms of obligations, the Repatriation Medical Authority, which is responsible for administering the Act, must now assess claims based on these updated exposure criteria. Veterans and their representatives must provide evidence that aligns with the new stipulations, including detailed records of solvent exposure, to substantiate their claims. Failure to meet these criteria could result in the denial of entitlements for those affected by primary mesangial IgA glomerulonephritis.
Failure to comply with the requirements set out in this instrument may result in legal consequences. While the specific penalties for non-compliance are not detailed in the legislative instrument itself, breaches of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 can lead to civil and criminal penalties. For instance, providing false or misleading information in a claim could potentially lead to prosecution under criminal law, with penalties including fines and imprisonment. Under the administrative law, failure to comply with the statutory requirements may result in the overturning of decisions or the imposition of corrective actions by the relevant authorities. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, but they underscore the importance of adhering to the legislative requirements.