Amendment of Statement of Principles concerning gout No. 44 of 2003

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2005B02423 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Instrument No.44 of 2003

 

Amendment of Statement of Principles

concerning

 

GOUT

 

 

Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority amends, under subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the Act), Instrument No.12 of 2000 by:

 

  1. in paragraph 8, deleting the definition of “being obese” and inserting in its place the following:

 

““being obese” means an increase in body weight by way of fat accumulation which results in a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or greater.

 

The BMI = W/H2 and where:

 

W is the person’s weight in kilograms and

H is the person’s height in metres;”

 

2. The amendment made by this instrument applies to all matters to which Instrument No.12 of 2000 and section 120B of the Act apply.

Dated this Seventh  day of  October  2003

 

 

The Common Seal of the    )

Repatriation Medical Authority   )

was affixed to this instrument  )

in the presence of    )

KEN DONALD

CHAIRMAN

Overview

The Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 was enacted to provide various benefits to veterans, their dependants, and other eligible persons. This Act, through its legislative instruments, seeks to ensure that the benefits and entitlements are clearly defined and accessible to those who qualify. The 2003 Amendment of the Statement of Principles concerning Gout, introduced by the Repatriation Medical Authority, addresses the need to refine the definition of certain medical conditions, such as obesity, to ensure accurate and fair assessment of veterans' entitlements. The policy objective behind this amendment is to provide a precise and medically accepted definition of "being obese," which is crucial for determining eligibility for certain benefits related to gout. The amendment, which updates the definition based on the Body Mass Index (BMI), aims to reflect contemporary medical understanding and ensure that the criteria for entitlement are both fair and medically sound.

Scope and Application

The Legislative Instrument No.44 of 2003 amends the Statement of Principles concerning gout under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, specifically revising the definition of "being obese" within the scope of veterans' entitlements. This amendment applies to all matters governed by Instrument No.12 of 2000 and section 120B of the Act, impacting veterans who seek entitlements related to obesity-linked conditions. The new definition, which is based on Body Mass Index (BMI) calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared, replaces the previous definition and sets a threshold of BMI 30 or greater for obesity. The instrument, dated the Seventh day of October 2003, is issued under the authority of the Repatriation Medical Authority and signed by Ken Donald, the Chairman, indicating its official endorsement and applicability within the Australian jurisdiction.

Key Provisions

This legislative instrument (Instrument No.44 of 2003) amends the Statement of Principles concerning Gout under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 by altering the definition of "being obese" in paragraph 8 of Instrument No.12 of 2000. Specifically, it replaces the existing definition with a new one that states "being obese" means an increase in body weight by way of fat accumulation which results in a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or greater. The BMI is calculated using the formula BMI = W/H², where W is the person's weight in kilograms and H is their height in metres. The primary obligation imposed by this amendment is the requirement for all relevant matters to conform to the new definition of obesity as outlined in the instrument. This includes any assessments or evaluations conducted under Instrument No.12 of 2000 and section 120B of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. This means that in any future matters, the definition of obesity must be based on a BMI of 30 or greater rather than any previous criteria that might have been in place. While this legislative instrument itself does not impose direct penalties for non-compliance, any failure to adhere to the amended definition could have significant consequences in related legal or administrative proceedings. For instance, if an assessment or decision-making process concerning veterans' entitlements fails to use the correct definition of obesity, it could lead to invalid or contested outcomes. Such outcomes could be subject to judicial review, and parties involved might face the necessity of re-evaluating their positions or providing additional evidence to meet the new criteria. The implications of these changes extend to the interpretation and application of the Act in practical scenarios. For instance, when determining eligibility for certain benefits or pensions related to gout, the new definition will be crucial. This ensures that all assessments are based on a consistent and medically recognised standard, thereby potentially affecting the outcomes of individual cases under the Act.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans’ Entitlements Act
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Commencement Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.