Instrument No.43 of 2003
Amendment of Statement of Principles
concerning
GOUT
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986
- The Repatriation Medical Authority amends, under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the Act), Instrument No.11 of 2000 by:
- in paragraph 8, deleting the definition of “being obese” and inserting in its place the following:
““being obese” means an increase in body weight by way of fat accumulation which results in a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or greater.
The BMI = W/H2 and where:
W is the person’s weight in kilograms and
H is the person’s height in metres;”
2. The amendment made by this instrument applies to all matters to which Instrument No.11 of 2000 and section 120A of the Act apply.
Dated this Seventh day of October 2003
The Common Seal of the )
Repatriation Medical Authority )
was affixed to this instrument )
in the presence of )
KEN DONALD
CHAIRMAN
Overview
The Repatriation Medical Authority amended the Statement of Principles concerning Gout under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 in 2003 to address the definition of "being obese" as it applied to veterans. The amendment to Instrument No.11 of 2000, made through Instrument No.43 of 2003, replaces the previous definition of obesity with a more specific one based on Body Mass Index (BMI). The new definition states that obesity is an increase in body weight due to fat accumulation, resulting in a BMI of 30 or greater. This change was enacted to provide a more scientifically grounded and consistent measure of obesity for the purposes of assessing veterans' entitlements, ensuring that the criteria are clear and applicable across all relevant matters under the Act. The policy objective of this amendment is to ensure accurate and equitable assessment of veterans' health conditions related to obesity.
Scope and Application
This legislative instrument amends the definition of "being obese" in the Statement of Principles concerning gout under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. The amendment, executed by the Repatriation Medical Authority, replaces the existing definition with a more specific criterion based on Body Mass Index (BMI). The new definition states that "being obese" refers to an increase in body weight due to fat accumulation, resulting in a BMI of 30 or greater, calculated using the formula BMI = W/H², where W represents weight in kilograms and H represents height in metres. This amendment applies to all matters governed by Instrument No. 11 of 2000 and section 120A of the Act. By updating the definition, the legislation seeks to provide a clearer and more scientifically grounded basis for assessing obesity in the context of veterans' entitlements related to gout.
Key Provisions
The legislative instrument amends the definition of "being obese" within the context of veterans' entitlements, specifically in relation to the Statement of Principles concerning gout. Under the original definition in paragraph 8 of Instrument No.11 of 2000, obesity was defined in a way that is now deleted. Instead, the new definition, as provided in the instrument, states that "being obese" means an increase in body weight by way of fat accumulation which results in a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or greater (paragraph 8). The BMI is calculated using the formula BMI = W/H², where W represents the person’s weight in kilograms, and H represents the person’s height in metres. This new definition is intended to standardise the measurement of obesity and ensure consistency in the assessment of veterans' claims related to obesity and its impact on health conditions such as gout.
The obligations imposed by this legislative instrument primarily concern the Repatriation Medical Authority, which is tasked with ensuring that the updated definition of obesity is applied consistently across all matters governed by Instrument No.11 of 2000 and section 120A of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. This includes any ongoing or new claims where obesity might be a relevant factor. The Authority must ensure that medical assessments and decisions are made in accordance with the revised definition, thus ensuring fairness and accuracy in the evaluation of veterans’ entitlements.
In terms of breaches and consequences, the instrument itself does not specify offences, penalties, or consequences for non-compliance. However, any failure by the Repatriation Medical Authority to adhere to the updated definition of obesity could potentially result in incorrect assessments or decisions on veterans' claims, which could be subject to review or appeal under the relevant provisions of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. While the instrument does not impose specific penalties, the consequences of such non-compliance could include legal challenges, financial implications for the Authority, and potential detriment to affected veterans if their claims are incorrectly assessed.