Instrument No. 39 of 2004
Amendment of Statement of Principles
concerning
DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986
and
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004
- The Repatriation Medical Authority amends, under subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, Instrument No. 6 of 2001, by:
- in clause 8, deleting the definition of “spinal cord injury”, and inserting in its place the following:
“‘spinal cord injury’ means an injury to the long tracts of the spinal cord resulting in permanent motor or sensory deficits below the level of the lesion;”
2. The amendment made by this instrument applies to all matters to which Instrument No. 6 of 2001, section 120B of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and section 339 of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 apply.
Dated this seventh day of October 2004
The Common Seal of the )
Repatriation Medical Authority )
was affixed to this instrument )
in the presence of )
KEN DONALD
CHAIRMAN
Overview
This legislative instrument, numbered 39 of 2004, amends the Statement of Principles concerning Deep Vein Thrombosis, as outlined in the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. Enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority under subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, the amendment specifically revises the definition of "spinal cord injury" to clarify that it refers to injuries to the long tracts of the spinal cord resulting in permanent motor or sensory deficits below the level of the lesion. This amendment aims to provide a more precise understanding of what constitutes a spinal cord injury for the purposes of the legislation, ensuring that it aligns with the policy objective of accurately compensating veterans for injuries sustained during service. The changes apply to all relevant matters governed by the aforementioned acts and the initial instrument, No. 6 of 2001.
Scope and Application
This legislative instrument, numbered 39 of 2004, pertains specifically to the amendment of the Statement of Principles concerning deep vein thrombosis as it relates to veterans’ entitlements and military rehabilitation compensation. The Repatriation Medical Authority, under the auspices of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, modifies Instrument No. 6 of 2001 by replacing the definition of "spinal cord injury" with a more precise one that describes it as an injury to the long tracts of the spinal cord resulting in permanent motor or sensory deficits below the level of the lesion. This amendment extends to all matters governed by the aforementioned acts and sections, thereby ensuring that the definition of spinal cord injury is consistently applied across relevant cases and entitlements. The amendment does not specify any exclusions or exemptions, nor does it delineate a particular geographic or jurisdictional scope beyond the Commonwealth, as it affects all entities and persons subject to the stated acts.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of this legislative instrument focus on amending the definition of "spinal cord injury" in the Statement of Principles concerning Deep Vein Thrombosis, as it relates to the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (sections 120B and 339, respectively). The main change (section 1) is the deletion of the previous definition of "spinal cord injury" and its replacement with a new definition that specifies an injury to the long tracts of the spinal cord resulting in permanent motor or sensory deficits below the level of the lesion. This amendment is significant as it refines the criteria for what constitutes a qualifying spinal cord injury under the legislative framework governing veterans' entitlements and military compensation.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. Under the new definition, any party claiming compensation or benefits related to a spinal cord injury must demonstrate that the injury meets the criteria outlined in the amended Statement of Principles. This means providing evidence that the injury resulted in permanent motor or sensory deficits below the lesion level. The Repatriation Medical Authority, as the governing body, must also ensure that all claims are assessed in accordance with this updated definition, which now serves as the benchmark for eligibility.
Failure to comply with the provisions of this Act may result in various consequences. For instance, individuals who submit claims based on the old definition of a spinal cord injury after the amendment date may find their claims rejected or invalidated if they do not meet the new criteria. Furthermore, any party found to be deliberately misleading or providing false information to meet the eligibility criteria could face legal repercussions. While the specific penalties for such breaches are not detailed in the provided text, they may include fines, legal penalties, or other civil or criminal consequences as prescribed by relevant laws.
In summary, the legislative instrument amends the definition of "spinal cord injury" within the Statement of Principles concerning Deep Vein Thrombosis, affecting both the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This amendment imposes a clear obligation on claimants to provide evidence that aligns with the new definition, while also placing a responsibility on the Repatriation Medical Authority to enforce these criteria. Non-compliance or fraudulent claims could lead to serious legal and financial consequences for the parties involved.