Instrument No.57 of 2003
Amendment of Statement of Principles
concerning
CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986
- The Repatriation Medical Authority amends, under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the Act), Instrument No.52 of 1999, as amended by Instrument No.30 of 2002, by:
- in paragraph 8, deleting the definition of “thrombocytopenia” and inserting in its place the following:
““thrombocytopenia” means an acquired platelet count of less than
50 000 per microlitre on haematological testing;”
2. The amendment made by this instrument applies to all matters to which Instrument No.52 of 1999, as amended by Instrument No.30 of 2002, and section 120A of the Act apply.
Dated this Seventh day of November 2003
The Common Seal of the )
Repatriation Medical Authority )
was affixed to this instrument )
in the presence of )
KEN DONALD
CHAIRMAN
Overview
The Legislative Instrument No.57 of 2003, issued under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, represents a refinement to the Statement of Principles concerning Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) for the purposes of veterans' entitlements. This amendment, introduced by the Repatriation Medical Authority, aims to update and clarify the medical definition of "thrombocytopenia" in the context of claims related to cerebrovascular accidents. The original definition was replaced to specify an acquired platelet count of less than 50,000 per microlitre as determined through haematological testing. This change seeks to provide a more precise criterion for the assessment of veterans' claims, ensuring that the medical standards align with current clinical practices. The policy objective is to maintain the integrity and fairness of the veterans' compensation system by ensuring that medical definitions are both accurate and reflective of contemporary medical knowledge.
Scope and Application
The Legislative Instrument No.57 of 2003, an amendment to the Statement of Principles concerning cerebrovascular accident under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, modifies the definition of "thrombocytopenia" to specify an acquired platelet count of less than 50,000 per microlitre on haematological testing. This change applies to all matters governed by the original Instrument No.52 of 1999 as amended by Instrument No.30 of 2002 and section 120A of the Act. The amendment extends to all veterans and their dependents who may have claims related to cerebrovascular accidents, ensuring that the criteria for thrombocytopenia in such claims are clearly and accurately defined. The amendment does not specify any exclusions or exemptions, nor does it mention any geographic or jurisdictional limitations, implying that it applies nationally where the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 is in force. The Repatriation Medical Authority retains the power to extend or further refine the application of this amendment through subordinate instruments if necessary.
Key Provisions
The key operative section of this legislative instrument is the amendment to the definition of "thrombocytopenia" found in paragraph 8 of Instrument No.52 of 1999, as amended by Instrument No.30 of 2002 (sections referenced in parentheses). This amendment redefines thrombocytopenia as an acquired platelet count of less than 50,000 per microlitre on haematological testing. This change specifies the precise medical criteria for the condition, ensuring that the definition aligns with current medical standards.
Under this Act, the Repatriation Medical Authority has the responsibility to ensure that the definition of thrombocytopenia is updated to reflect contemporary medical understanding. This change is intended to ensure that veterans and their representatives have a clear and accurate understanding of what constitutes the condition for the purposes of their entitlements. The amendment applies to all matters governed by Instrument No.52 of 1999, as amended by Instrument No.30 of 2002, and section 120A of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, meaning it affects all relevant cases and claims that are currently pending or that may be lodged in the future.
Breaching the requirements of this Act, or not adhering to the updated definition of thrombocytopenia, could result in significant consequences. While specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences are not outlined in the instrument, it is clear that any failure to comply with the updated medical definitions could impact the validity of claims or the assessment of entitlements. This could potentially lead to disputes or delays in the processing of veterans’ claims, highlighting the importance of adhering to the precise definitions set out in the legislation.