Instrument No.32 of 2002
Amendment of Statement of Principles
concerning
ACQUIRED CATARACT
ICD-10-AM CODES: H25, H26, H28.1, H28.2
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986
1. The Repatriation Medical Authority amends, under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, Instrument No.37 of 2001 by:
- in paragraph 8 deleting the definition of “diabetes mellitus”.
2. The amendment made by this instrument applies to all matters to which Instrument No.37 of 2001 and section 120A of the Act apply.
Dated this Ninth day of January 2002
The Common Seal of the )
Repatriation Medical Authority )
was affixed to this instrument )
in the presence of )
KEN DONALD
CHAIRMAN
Overview
The Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, is the primary legislative instrument governing the entitlements and benefits provided to veterans, their families, and dependants. This legislation was introduced to address the need for a comprehensive framework that recognises and compensates the sacrifices and service of individuals who have served in the Australian Defence Force. One of the key objectives of this Act is to ensure that veterans and their families receive appropriate financial and medical support, including access to healthcare services and pensions. In the context of this legislative instrument, the Repatriation Medical Authority, under the authority of the Act, amends previous statements of principles to refine the classification and understanding of medical conditions, such as acquired cataractic conditions, thereby ensuring that veterans receive the correct entitlements based on accurate and updated medical definitions.
Scope and Application
The legislative instrument F2005B02501 pertains to the amendment of the Statement of Principles concerning certain medical conditions, specifically those related to acquired cataractic conditions, as coded under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. This amendment, executed by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the authority granted by subsection 196B(2) of the Act, involves the deletion of the definition of “diabetes mellitus” as previously defined in Instrument No.37 of 2001. The amendment extends to all matters governed by Instrument No.37 of 2001 and section 120A of the Act, thereby affecting the interpretation and application of these provisions in relevant claims or proceedings. This adjustment clarifies the scope of conditions covered under the Act, ensuring that the definitions and principles are up to date and accurate. The amendment is nationally applicable, affecting all entities and individuals subject to the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, and it does not specify any exclusions or exemptions within the text provided.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of this legislative instrument involve the amendment of the Statement of Principles concerning acquired cataractic conditions under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. Specifically, section 1 of the instrument, through subsection 196B(2) of the Act, mandates the Repatriation Medical Authority to revise Instrument No.37 of 2001. This revision includes the deletion of the definition of “diabetes mellitus” in paragraph 8 of the original document (section 1). This amendment is significant as it adjusts the criteria and definitions previously established, which may impact the assessment and recognition of veterans' claims related to cataractic conditions.
Under this amended legislation, the Repatriation Medical Authority is tasked with ensuring that the changes are implemented correctly and consistently across all relevant matters. This means that the new definition and criteria must be adhered to when evaluating claims that were previously governed by Instrument No.37 of 2001 and section 120A of the Act (section 2). Consequently, any party involved in the administration, processing, or adjudication of such claims must align their practices with these updated provisions to ensure compliance.
The consequences of non-compliance with these legislative amendments can be substantial. While specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the text, it is clear that any failure to implement or adhere to the new provisions could result in invalid claims or improper assessments. Such breaches might lead to legal challenges or the need for corrective actions, impacting both the claimants and the Repatriation Medical Authority. The legislative framework implies that maintaining accuracy and adherence to these updated criteria is critical to avoid any potential legal or administrative repercussions.
In summary, the legislative instrument directs the Repatriation Medical Authority to amend Instrument No.37 of 2001 by removing the definition of “diabetes mellitus” from paragraph 8. This change applies to all relevant matters governed by the original instrument and section 120A of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. The obligations on the Repatriation Medical Authority and associated parties are to ensure that these amendments are correctly applied and adhered to in all relevant claim assessments. Breaches of these provisions could lead to serious administrative and legal consequences.