Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
Section 378
AMENDMENT OF NOTICE ESTABLISHING KAKADU BOARD OF MANAGEMENT
I, SUSSAN LEY, Minister for the Environment, having agreed with the Northern Land Council, being an Aboriginal Land Council established under the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976, on the amendment of the notice published in Gazette No. GN42 on 26 October 1994 establishing the Kakadu Board of Management, hereby amend that notice pursuant to paragraph 378(1)(b) of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 by:
a) omitting from paragraph (c) of the notice, 'fourteen persons' and replacing with ‘twenty one persons’;
b) omitting from paragraph (d) of the notice, ‘preconditions’ and replacing with ‘qualifications’; and
c) omitting the Schedule to the notice and substituting the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Qualifications for appointment as a member of the Kakadu Board of Management shall be:
a) sixteen members each to be an adult Aboriginal person nominated by the traditional Aboriginal owners of Kakadu National Park;
b) one member to be the Director of National Parks;
c) one member to be the Assistant Secretary with responsibility for Kakadu National Park within the Parks Australia Division of the Department of State responsible for the Environment;
d) one member to be a person employed in the tourism industry in the Northern Territory acceptable to the traditional Aboriginal owners of Kakadu National Park;
e) one member to be a person prominent in nature conservation acceptable to the traditional Aboriginal owners of Kakadu National Park; and
f) one member to be a person nominated by the Northern Territory and approved by the traditional Aboriginal owners of Kakadu National Park in accordance with s390A of the EPBC Act.
SIGNED
Federal Minister for the Environment Sussan Ley
Overview
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, addresses the need for comprehensive protection and management of Australia's biodiversity and environmental heritage. One of the key objectives of the Act is to establish mechanisms for effective governance and management of natural and cultural resources, ensuring that these are preserved for future generations while also recognising the rights and interests of Indigenous communities. This legislative framework provides a platform for collaborative decision-making involving various stakeholders, including Indigenous traditional owners, government entities, and industry representatives. The recent amendment to the notice establishing the Kakadu Board of Management, as per Gazette No. C2021G00355, reflects a policy objective to enhance representation and qualifications of board members, ensuring a more inclusive and effective governance structure for the management of Kakadu National Park.
Scope and Application
The amendment to the notice establishing the Kakadu Board of Management under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 concerns the qualifications and composition of the Board. It applies to the appointment of members to the Board, which is responsible for managing the Kakadu National Park. The amendment specifies that the Board will comprise a total of twenty-one members, including sixteen adult Aboriginal persons nominated by traditional Aboriginal owners, one Director of National Parks, one Assistant Secretary from the Parks Australia Division within the relevant Department of State, one tourism industry representative from the Northern Territory, one prominent nature conservation figure, and one member nominated by the Northern Territory and approved by the traditional Aboriginal owners. The changes to the notice also remove the previous reference to 'preconditions' and replace it with 'qualifications'. The amendment applies within the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth of Australia and is specific to the Kakadu National Park, reflecting the collaborative governance approach between the government, traditional Aboriginal owners, and other stakeholders. This amendment does not introduce any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds but modifies the qualifications and composition of the Board to better reflect the diverse interests and responsibilities associated with managing the park.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this legislation amend the notice establishing the Kakadu Board of Management, as published in Gazette No. GN42 on 26 October 1994. The amendments are made pursuant to section 378(1)(b) of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. The amendments to the notice include changes to the number of members, the criteria for their appointment, and the qualifications required for each member. Specifically, the number of board members is increased from fourteen to twenty-one, the term 'preconditions' is replaced with 'qualifications', and a new schedule is introduced detailing the qualifications for appointment.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on the parties involved. The Kakadu Board of Management now comprises twenty-one members, with sixteen of them being adult Aboriginal persons nominated by the traditional Aboriginal owners of Kakadu National Park. Additionally, the Director of National Parks, the Assistant Secretary for Kakadu National Park within the Parks Australia Division of the Department of State responsible for the Environment, and a person employed in the tourism industry in the Northern Territory must also be board members. Furthermore, a person prominent in nature conservation and another nominated by the Northern Territory and approved by the traditional Aboriginal owners are required to join the board. This comprehensive representation ensures diverse perspectives and expertise in managing the park.
The legislation outlines consequences for breach of its provisions. While specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences are not detailed in this particular amendment, breaches of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 generally can result in significant penalties. For example, individuals found guilty of contravening the Act may face fines of up to $222,222 or imprisonment for up to two years, or both, for each offence. Corporations may face fines of up to $1,111,111 or more, depending on the severity of the breach. These penalties underscore the importance of compliance with the Act and its amendments, ensuring the protection and conservation of biodiversity.