Airworthiness Directives 2004
I, DAVID ALAN VILLIERS, delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety
Authority, acting under subregulation 39.001 (1) of the Civil
Aviation Safety Regulations 1998:
(a) revoke the Airworthiness Directives mentioned in
Schedule 1; and
(b) make, as separate instruments, each Airworthiness
Directive mentioned in Schedule 1 and attached.
David Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority
20 December 2004
Note: Each attached Airworthiness Directive is being re-made in exactly the
same form as appears in the latest published edition of the Directive.
Schedule 1 Revocation and Remaking of
Airworthiness Directives
Rolls Royce Germany Turbine Engines - BR700 Series
AD Name AD Number
High Pressure Turbine Discs AD/BR700/1
Oil Filter Differential Switch AD/BR700/2
LP Compressor Fan Disc Cracks AD/BR700/3
Engine Electronic Controller AD/BR700/4
Overview
The Airworthiness Directives 2004, enacted on 20 December 2004, were introduced to address the need for updated and consolidated safety regulations within the aviation industry. This legislative instrument was enacted by David Alan Villiers, a delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, acting under the authority conferred by subregulation 39.001 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. The primary objective of this legislation was to revoke existing airworthiness directives concerning specific turbine engines and re-promulgate them with updated content, ensuring that all stakeholders have access to the most current safety directives. This approach aimed to enhance the safety and reliability of aviation operations by ensuring that all technical directives are current and accurately reflect the latest safety standards and requirements.
Scope and Application
The Airworthiness Directives 2004, issued under the authority of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, applies to turbine engines of the BR700 Series manufactured by Rolls Royce Germany, specifically addressing high pressure turbine discs, oil filter differential switches, low-pressure compressor fan disc cracks, and engine electronic controllers. This legislative instrument impacts entities involved in the manufacture, maintenance, and operation of aircraft that utilise these specified turbine engines. Geographically, the Act applies on a national level across Australia, adhering to the jurisdiction of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority. The Act does not explicitly state exclusions or exemptions but implicitly targets the aviation industry and all relevant stakeholders, including aircraft manufacturers, maintenance organisations, and operators, ensuring compliance with airworthiness standards. The application of the Act extends through subordinate instruments, which are detailed in the attached Airworthiness Directives, each re-made in the same form as the latest published editions.
Key Provisions
The Airworthiness Directives 2004 primarily serve to revoke existing Airworthiness Directives related to specific turbine engines and then re-make them as separate instruments (s. 1). This is done to ensure that the directives are up-to-date and reflect the latest regulatory requirements. Specifically, section 1(a) revokes the previously mentioned Airworthiness Directives listed in Schedule 1, while section 1(b) re-makes these directives as separate instruments, attaching them to the legislation. This systematic approach ensures that the directives are legally current and enforceable.
The obligations imposed by these Airworthiness Directives are significant for the entities they govern. Manufacturers, operators, and maintenance providers must comply with the specific requirements outlined in each directive. For instance, the directives may mandate regular inspections, specific maintenance procedures, or the replacement of certain components to ensure the continued airworthiness of the affected aircraft. Compliance is not optional; it is a legal requirement that must be met to maintain the safety standards set by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority.
Violation of the provisions outlined in these Airworthiness Directives can lead to severe consequences. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provide the framework for potential penalties. Offences may result in both civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties can include fines up to the maximum limits prescribed by the regulations, while criminal penalties can include imprisonment. The exact penalties depend on the severity of the breach and the specific provisions of the regulations, but the potential for significant fines and imprisonment underscores the importance of strict compliance.
In summary, the Airworthiness Directives 2004 mandate the revocation and re-making of specific directives related to Rolls Royce Germany turbine engines, ensuring they are current and enforceable. Compliance with these directives is mandatory for all relevant parties, with serious consequences for non-compliance. The potential penalties, which include fines and imprisonment, highlight the critical nature of adhering to these regulations to maintain aviation safety standards.