Airworthiness Directives 2004 - Revocation and Remaking - Piaggio P166 Series Aeroplanes

Overview

The Airworthiness Directives 2004 is a legislative instrument that was enacted under the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. This instrument was introduced by David Alan Villiers, acting as a delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, to address the need for the revocation and remaking of specific airworthiness directives pertaining to the Piaggio P166 Series Aeroplanes. The objective of this legislative instrument is to ensure the continued safety and airworthiness of these aircraft by updating and replacing the existing directives with new, revised versions as per the latest published editions. Each airworthiness directive is re-made in the same form as it appears in the most recent publication, thereby maintaining the integrity and relevance of the safety standards required for these aircraft.

Scope and Application

The Airworthiness Directives 2004, issued under the authority of David Alan Villiers as a delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, primarily applies to all aircraft manufacturers, operators, and owners of Piaggio P166 Series Aeroplanes operating within Australia. The directives are designed to ensure the ongoing airworthiness of these aircraft by specifying mandatory modifications and inspections on various components such as the engine controls, fuel systems, electrical systems, and landing gear, among others. Each directive is meticulously detailed to provide clear and specific instructions to ensure compliance with safety standards. The scope of the Act extends nationally, with its provisions applicable across all states and territories within Australia, thereby establishing a uniform regulatory framework for the maintenance and operation of these aircraft. While the Act itself does not explicitly state exclusions or exemptions, it is understood that certain operations might be subject to additional scrutiny or specific regulatory conditions as defined by subordinate instruments or other relevant legislation. The Act effectively revokes and re-makes each Airworthiness Directive listed in Schedule 1, ensuring that all directives remain current and aligned with the latest safety requirements.

Key Provisions

The Airworthiness Directives 2004, issued under subregulation 39.001 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, involve the revocation of several existing Airworthiness Directives concerning Piaggio P166 Series Aeroplanes and the re-making of these directives as separate instruments. Specifically, the directives listed in Schedule 1 are revoked and re-made to ensure they are aligned with the latest published editions. Each re-made directive retains its original form, thereby maintaining the standards and requirements for the airworthiness of the specified aircraft series. The directives cover a range of modifications and inspections related to engine controls, fuel systems, electrical supply, landing gear, and other critical components. These directives impose specific obligations on the parties and entities governed by them. For instance, operators of Piaggio P166 Series Aeroplanes must comply with the detailed instructions and requirements outlined in each Airworthiness Directive. This includes performing necessary modifications, inspections, and replacements as specified. Additionally, the directives mandate that all changes must be carried out by qualified personnel and that records of compliance must be maintained. These obligations are essential to ensure the continued safety and airworthiness of the aircraft. Failure to comply with the provisions of these Airworthiness Directives can result in significant consequences. Under the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, non-compliance can lead to civil penalties, including fines. The exact amount of these fines is not specified in the legislative instrument but can vary based on the severity and nature of the breach. Additionally, continued operation of an aircraft that does not comply with the directives may lead to enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, potentially resulting in grounding of the aircraft or other regulatory sanctions. In severe cases, criminal charges could be pursued, particularly if non-compliance results in accidents or endangers public safety.