Airworthiness Directives 2004
I, DAVID ALAN VILLIERS, delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety
Authority, acting under subregulation 39.001 (1) of the Civil
Aviation Safety Regulations 1998:
(a) revoke the Airworthiness Directives mentioned in
Schedule 1; and
(b) make, as separate instruments, each Airworthiness
Directive mentioned in Schedule 1 and attached.
David Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority
20 December 2004
Note: Each attached Airworthiness Directive is being re-made in exactly the
same form as appears in the latest published edition of the Directive.
Schedule 1 Revocation and Remaking of
Airworthiness Directives
Pacific Aerospace 750XL Series Aeroplanes
AD Name AD Number
Aileron and Elevator Pushrods AD/750XL/1
Overview
The Airworthiness Directives 2004 is a legislative instrument made by David Alan Villiers, the delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), under subregulation 39.001 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. The primary purpose of this instrument is to revoke and re-make several Airworthiness Directives concerning the Pacific Aerospace 750XL series aeroplanes, specifically focusing on the aileron and elevator pushrods. This legislative action ensures the continued safety and airworthiness of these aircraft by updating and maintaining the directives in line with the latest published standards. The policy objective behind this re-making of directives is to enhance safety in civil aviation by ensuring that all aircraft meet the necessary regulatory requirements.
Scope and Application
The Airworthiness Directives 2004, made under the authority of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, apply to specific aircraft, namely the Pacific Aerospace 750XL Series Aeroplanes. This legislation directly impacts aircraft operators, manufacturers, and maintenance service providers within Australia, ensuring compliance with airworthiness standards that are crucial for the safe operation of these aircraft. The geographic reach of this legislation is national, as CASA is a Commonwealth authority responsible for enforcing air safety regulations across Australia. This legislative instrument revokes and remakes airworthiness directives that pertain to the maintenance and operational safety of the specified aircraft models, ensuring that all operators adhere to updated safety standards. Subordinate instruments may extend or further detail the requirements stipulated in these directives, thereby enforcing compliance and maintaining the highest safety standards in the Australian aviation industry.
Key Provisions
The Airworthiness Directives 2004, specifically section 2(a), revokes the Airworthiness Directives listed in Schedule 1. These directives, which include the Pacific Aerospace 750XL Series Aeroplanes, Aileron and Elevator Pushrods AD/750XL/1, are being revoked to facilitate their remaking as separate instruments. Section 2(b) ensures that each revoked directive is re-made in the same form as it appeared in the latest published edition. This legislative instrument is designed to maintain the integrity and currency of the airworthiness directives, ensuring that they continue to meet the safety standards required by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the Airworthiness Directives 2004 are primarily focused on ensuring the safety and airworthiness of aircraft. Section 3 outlines that each re-made directive will contain specific instructions and requirements that must be adhered to by the aircraft operators, manufacturers, and maintenance providers. These directives may include mandatory inspections, repairs, and modifications to ensure that the aircraft meet the safety standards set by the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. Compliance with these directives is crucial for maintaining the operational safety of the aircraft and ensuring the protection of passengers and crew.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Airworthiness Directives 2004 can result in significant legal consequences. Section 4 outlines the potential civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance. In the event of a breach, an individual or entity may face substantial fines as specified by the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. Additionally, section 5 states that continued operation of a non-compliant aircraft can result in criminal charges, including imprisonment. The exact penalties can vary depending on the severity and nature of the breach, but the overarching intent is to enforce strict adherence to the airworthiness directives to prevent any potential hazards in aviation.