Airworthiness Directives 2004
I, DAVID ALAN VILLIERS, delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety
Authority, acting under subregulation 39.001 (1) of the Civil
Aviation Safety Regulations 1998:
(a) revoke the Airworthiness Directives mentioned in
Schedule 1; and
(b) make, as separate instruments, each Airworthiness
Directive mentioned in Schedule 1 and attached.
David Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority
20 December 2004
Note: Each attached Airworthiness Directive is being re-made in exactly the
same form as appears in the latest published edition of the Directive.
Schedule 1 Revocation and Remaking of
Airworthiness Directives
Maule M-6 Series Aeroplanes
AD Name AD Number
Wing Lift Struts AD/ML-M6/1 Amdt 1
Nicopress Sleeves on Control Cables AD/ML-M6/2
Overview
The Airworthiness Directives 2004, enacted by David Alan Villiers, a delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, revokes and re-makes several existing airworthiness directives pertaining to specific aircraft models, namely the Maule M-6 Series Aeroplanes. This legislative instrument operates under subregulation 39.001 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, with the overarching aim of ensuring the safety and airworthiness of these aircraft. Each revoked directive is re-made in exactly the same form as it appears in the latest published edition, thus maintaining consistency and ensuring that the safety standards remain current and effectively enforced. The policy objective behind these directives is to ensure that all aircraft within the specified categories meet the necessary safety requirements to protect the public and maintain the integrity of the aviation industry.
Scope and Application
The Airworthiness Directives 2004, issued under the authority of David Alan Villiers as a delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, serve to revoke and re-make various Airworthiness Directives pertaining to specific aircraft models, particularly the Maule M-6 Series Aeroplanes. This legislation applies directly to the aviation industry, specifically targeting aircraft manufacturers, operators, and maintenance providers associated with the Maule M-6 Series. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this legislation is nationwide, as it pertains to the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, which have a Commonwealth scope. This legislative instrument aims to ensure that all relevant entities comply with the most current safety standards and regulatory requirements. The revocation and re-making of these directives ensure consistency and updated compliance with safety regulations, although the specific exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds are detailed within each individual Airworthiness Directive attached to this instrument.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of the Airworthiness Directives 2004, as promulgated by the Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), are those that revoke existing Airworthiness Directives and re-make them as separate instruments. Specifically, section 1(a) revokes the Airworthiness Directives listed in Schedule 1, while section 1(b) re-makes these directives as separate instruments. These directives, which pertain to the Maule M-6 Series Aeroplanes, address specific issues such as wing lift struts and nicopress sleeves on control cables. Each directive is re-made in exactly the same form as it appears in the latest published edition of the directives, ensuring consistency and clarity in the regulatory framework.
The Act imposes obligations on the parties or entities it governs, primarily focusing on ensuring the airworthiness of the Maule M-6 Series Aeroplanes. Operators of these aircraft must comply with the specific requirements outlined in the re-made Airworthiness Directives. This includes adhering to the technical specifications and maintenance procedures detailed in the directives concerning wing lift struts and nicopress sleeves on control cables. Ensuring compliance with these directives is crucial for maintaining the safety and operational standards of the aircraft, as mandated by CASA.
Failure to comply with the Airworthiness Directives can result in significant consequences, including both civil and criminal penalties. While specific penalties are not detailed in the legislative instrument, breaches of airworthiness directives can typically lead to enforcement actions by CASA, which may include fines, suspension of the aircraft’s airworthiness certificate, or even grounding of the aircraft. These penalties are intended to enforce adherence to safety standards and ensure that all aircraft meet the necessary regulatory requirements.
In summary, the Airworthiness Directives 2004, as detailed in this legislative instrument, serve to maintain and enhance the safety of Maule M-6 Series Aeroplanes by revoking and re-making specific directives related to critical components such as wing lift struts and nicopress sleeves on control cables. The obligations placed on operators and other relevant parties are clear and precise, aimed at ensuring that all necessary safety measures are implemented and maintained. Any non-compliance with these directives can lead to serious civil and potentially criminal consequences, underscoring the importance of adherence to the stipulated requirements.