Airworthiness Directives 2004
I, DAVID ALAN VILLIERS, delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety
Authority, acting under subregulation 39.001 (1) of the Civil
Aviation Safety Regulations 1998:
(a) revoke the Airworthiness Directives mentioned in
Schedule 1; and
(b) make, as separate instruments, each Airworthiness
Directive mentioned in Schedule 1 and attached.
David Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority
20 December 2004
Note: Each attached Airworthiness Directive is being re-made in exactly the
same form as appears in the latest published edition of the Directive.
Schedule 1 Revocation and Remaking of
Airworthiness Directives
Gyroflug SC01 B-160 (Speed Canard) Series Aeroplanes
AD Name AD Number
Airworthiness Limitations AD/GYRO/1
Overview
The Airworthiness Directives 2004 is a legislative instrument introduced by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to update and modernise existing airworthiness directives. Enacted under the authority of David Alan Villiers, the delegate of CASA, this instrument was formulated to ensure that the airworthiness standards for specific aircraft types remain current and effective. The Airworthiness Directives 2004 addresses the need for continuous updates to aviation safety regulations by revoking outdated directives and remaking them to reflect the latest safety standards and industry practices. This ensures that the safety of civil aviation in Australia is maintained and enhanced, aligning with the overarching policy objective of protecting the public and ensuring the safety of aircraft operations.
Scope and Application
The Airworthiness Directives 2004, made under the authority of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) and executed by the delegate David Alan Villiers, primarily pertain to the revocation and remaking of specific airworthiness directives. This legislative instrument applies to Gyroflug SC01 B-160 (Speed Canard) Series Aeroplanes, which are identified by their AD name and number. The scope of the Act extends to the aircraft specified in the attached directives and includes all persons and entities responsible for the maintenance, operation, and compliance of these aircraft with the outlined airworthiness limitations. The geographic reach of this Act is national, as CASA is the governing body for civil aviation safety across Australia. The Act does not specify any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds; however, it mandates that each directive is remade in the same form as it appears in the latest published edition. The application of these directives is not limited by subordinate instruments but is directly enforceable as stated.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of the legislative instrument F2006B07897 involve the revocation of existing Airworthiness Directives and the remaking of these directives in their entirety as separate instruments. Section 1 of the instrument outlines the revocation of the Airworthiness Directives listed in Schedule 1, while section 2 mandates the remaking of these directives. This process is intended to ensure that the latest, most accurate versions of the directives are in force, reflecting any updates or changes necessary for the safety and regulation of the specified aircraft.
The obligations and requirements imposed by this legislative instrument primarily pertain to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) and the entities it governs. The Authority is tasked with ensuring that the specified aircraft meet the new airworthiness standards as outlined in the remade directives. This includes conducting necessary inspections, ensuring compliance with the updated requirements, and maintaining accurate records of all actions taken under these directives. Operators of the affected aircraft must adhere to the limitations and requirements set forth in the new Airworthiness Directives, ensuring their operations meet the safety standards dictated by CASA.
The legislative instrument also addresses potential breaches of the Airworthiness Directives. Any entity, including aircraft operators or manufacturers, found in violation of the directives could face significant consequences. Civil penalties may include fines, and in severe cases, criminal charges could be pursued. The maximum penalties for breaches are not explicitly stated in the instrument but are likely to be in line with the broader civil aviation regulations, which can include substantial fines and imprisonment. These consequences underscore the importance of strict compliance with the airworthiness standards to ensure the safety of all aviation activities.