Airworthiness Directives 2004 - Revocation and Remaking - Grumman G21 (Goose) Series Aeroplanes

Overview

The Airworthiness Directives 2004, issued under the authority of David Alan Villiers, a delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, addresses the need to revoke and re-issue certain airworthiness directives for specific aircraft models, namely the Grumman G21 (Goose) Series Aeroplanes. This legislative instrument was enacted to ensure that the directives governing these aircraft are up-to-date and comply with current safety standards. The revocation and remaking of these directives aim to maintain the safety and airworthiness of the specified aircraft, ensuring that they meet the regulatory requirements set out by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority. This was achieved by precisely re-making each directive as it appears in the latest published edition, thereby providing clear, current, and enforceable safety guidelines for operators of these aircraft.

Scope and Application

The Legislative Instrument F2006B07889, titled "Airworthiness Directives 2004", pertains specifically to the aviation industry in Australia and involves the re-making and revocation of certain Airworthiness Directives (ADs) under the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. These directives apply to particular types of aircraft, in this instance, the Grumman G21 (Goose) Series Aeroplanes, and address various safety concerns such as inspection requirements for components like the below floor control system, horizontal stabiliser lower strut fittings, rudder control push-rod assembly, and fuel tank baffles. The application of these directives is geographically extensive, covering the entire Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring that all aircraft of the specified type operating within Australian airspace adhere to the stipulated safety standards. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) retains the authority to enforce these directives, ensuring compliance and maintaining airworthiness across the nation. There are no exclusions or exemptions mentioned in the legislative instrument, implying that all specified aircraft must comply with the outlined directives. The instrument does not extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments but instead re-makes each Airworthiness Directive in exactly the same form as appears in the latest published edition.

Key Provisions

The primary operative sections of this legislative instrument are sections (a) and (b) of the Airworthiness Directives 2004. Section (a) revokes the Airworthiness Directives listed in Schedule 1, which means that the previous directives are no longer in effect as of the date of this legislation. Section (b) then re-makes each of these directives as separate instruments, ensuring that the latest versions are now in force. These sections are crucial as they update and maintain the regulatory framework governing the airworthiness of specific aircraft models, such as the Grumman G21 (Goose) Series Aeroplanes. The obligations and requirements imposed by this Act are primarily focused on the maintenance and inspection of specific components of the Grumman G21 aeroplanes. The re-made Airworthiness Directives specify detailed inspection and maintenance protocols for components such as the below floor control system, horizontal stabiliser lower strut fittings, rudder control push-rod assembly, and fuel tank baffles. These requirements are intended to ensure that these aeroplanes meet the necessary safety standards and continue to be airworthy. Compliance with these directives is mandatory for aircraft operators, maintenance providers, and other relevant parties, who must adhere to the specified inspection and repair procedures to maintain the airworthiness of the aircraft. The legislative instrument also outlines the consequences for non-compliance with the Airworthiness Directives. Although specific penalties are not detailed in the text provided, under the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, breaches of airworthiness directives can result in significant civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties can include fines and enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, while criminal penalties may apply for more serious breaches, potentially leading to imprisonment. These consequences underscore the importance of strict adherence to the directives, ensuring that all parties involved prioritise safety and compliance to avoid legal repercussions.