Airworthiness Directives 2004
I, DAVID ALAN VILLIERS, delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety
Authority, acting under subregulation 39.001 (1) of the Civil
Aviation Safety Regulations 1998:
(a) revoke the Airworthiness Directives mentioned in
Schedule 1; and
(b) make, as separate instruments, each Airworthiness
Directive mentioned in Schedule 1 and attached.
David Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority
20 December 2004
Note: Each attached Airworthiness Directive is being re-made in exactly the
same form as appears in the latest published edition of the Directive.
Schedule 1 Revocation and Remaking of
Airworthiness Directives
DH 87 (Hornet Moth) Series Aeroplanes
AD Name AD Number
Seat Restraint Installations - Modification AD/DH 87/1
Flight Limitations and Structural Inspection AD/DH 87/2 Amdt 1
Overview
The Airworthiness Directives 2004, issued under the authority of David Alan Villiers as a delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), serves to address issues related to the airworthiness of specific aircraft models. Enacted on 20 December 2004, this legislative instrument aims to ensure that certain aircraft, such as the DH 87 (Hornet Moth) series aeroplanes, meet the necessary safety standards. This directive was implemented to rectify gaps in existing regulations and to provide specific guidance on modifications, flight limitations, and structural inspections, thereby enhancing the overall safety and airworthiness of these aircraft. The policy objective is to maintain and improve the safety of civil aviation through the implementation of specific airworthiness directives.
Scope and Application
The Airworthiness Directives 2004, promulgated by David Alan Villiers, the delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, serves to revoke and re-make specific Airworthiness Directives concerning certain types of aircraft, as detailed in Schedule 1. This legislative instrument applies directly to the entities and individuals who own, operate, or maintain the specified aircraft, specifically the de Havilland 87 (Hornet Moth) Series Aeroplanes. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this legislation is confined to Australia, as it is enacted under the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, which fall within the purview of the Commonwealth. The Act ensures that the aircraft in question meet specific safety standards and operational requirements, addressing seat restraint installations and flight limitations, as well as structural inspections. Notably, the Airworthiness Directives are re-made in exactly the same form as they appear in the latest published edition, ensuring consistency and compliance with updated safety standards.
Key Provisions
The Airworthiness Directives 2004 (F2006B07831) primarily address the revocation and re-making of specific Airworthiness Directives as listed in Schedule 1. Section 1(a) of the legislative instrument revokes the Airworthiness Directives mentioned in Schedule 1, while section 1(b) re-makes these directives as separate instruments, maintaining their content exactly as it appears in the latest published editions. The directives pertain to the DH 87 (Hornet Moth) series aeroplanes, with specific focus on seat restraint installations, modifications, flight limitations, and structural inspections.
The obligations and requirements imposed by this legislation are largely procedural, ensuring that the Airworthiness Directives are kept up-to-date and legally valid. By revoking the old directives and re-making them, the legislation ensures that the regulations governing the airworthiness of DH 87 series aeroplanes are current and enforceable. This process underscores the importance of maintaining precise and legally binding standards for aircraft safety and operational integrity. The re-making of the directives also ensures that any amendments or updates made since the last publication are incorporated into the current legal framework.
Failure to comply with the Airworthiness Directives can lead to various consequences, both civil and criminal. Non-compliance with these directives can result in aircraft being deemed unfit for flight, which poses significant safety risks. Additionally, operators who do not adhere to the specified modifications, limitations, and inspections may face regulatory action, including fines and sanctions from the Civil Aviation Safety Authority. While the specific penalties are not detailed in this legislative instrument, they are likely to be substantial given the critical nature of airworthiness standards. Compliance is essential to avoid potential legal repercussions and to ensure the safety of all passengers and crew aboard the affected aircraft.