Airworthiness Directives 2004 - Revocation and Remaking - DH 84 (Dragon) Series Aeroplanes

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006B07829 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 Airworthiness Directives 2004

 I, DAVID ALAN VILLIERS, delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety

 Authority, acting under subregulation 39.001 (1) of the Civil

 Aviation Safety Regulations 1998:

 (a) revoke the Airworthiness Directives mentioned in

 Schedule 1; and

 (b) make, as separate instruments, each Airworthiness

 Directive mentioned in Schedule 1 and attached.

 

 

 David Villiers

 Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority

 

  20 December 2004

 Note:   Each attached Airworthiness Directive is being re-made in exactly the

 same form as appears in the latest published edition of the Directive.

 


 Schedule 1 Revocation and Remaking of

 Airworthiness Directives

 DH 84 (Dragon) Series Aeroplanes

 AD Name AD Number

 Fuel System Control - Modification AD/DH 84/1

 Undercarriage Strut - Inspection AD/DH 84/2 Amdt 2

 Flight Limitations - CANCELLED AD/DH 84/3

 

Overview

The Airworthiness Directives 2004, enacted on 20 December 2004, were introduced by David Alan Villiers, acting as a delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority under the authority granted by the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. This legislative instrument was designed to address the need for updating and revoking certain airworthiness directives to ensure the continuing safety and reliability of aircraft operations. The primary objective is to maintain high standards of airworthiness by ensuring that the directives are current and reflective of the latest safety requirements and technological advancements. The revocation and remaking of these directives aim to ensure that the aviation industry adheres to the most recent safety protocols and standards.

Scope and Application

The Airworthiness Directives 2004, issued by David Alan Villiers as the delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, primarily applies to all persons, entities, and industries involved in the operation of aircraft, specifically the de Havilland 84 (Dragon) Series Aeroplanes. The legislation targets the maintenance, inspection, and modification of these aircraft to ensure they meet the necessary airworthiness standards. The geographic reach of this legislation extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring that all aviation activities within its jurisdiction are subject to these directives. The directives are applicable to both commercial and private operators of the specified aircraft types and involve particular conduct and transactions related to their airworthiness. Exclusions or exemptions are not explicitly stated in the text, suggesting that the directives apply broadly unless otherwise specified in subordinate instruments. These Airworthiness Directives are meticulously re-made to mirror the latest published editions, ensuring consistency and adherence to the most current safety standards.

Key Provisions

The Airworthiness Directives 2004 (F2006B07829) primarily operates through the revocation and remaking of specific Airworthiness Directives as outlined in Schedule 1 of the legislation (subsection 2). This legislative instrument revokes certain Airworthiness Directives related to the de Havilland 84 (Dragon) Series Aeroplanes, including AD/DH 84/1 concerning Fuel System Control - Modification and AD/DH 84/2 Amendment 2 regarding Undercarriage Strut - Inspection (subsection 3(a)). Concurrently, it re-makes these directives as separate instruments, ensuring they are published in the latest edition of the Airworthiness Directives, maintaining their original form (subsection 3(b)). These directives are crucial for maintaining the airworthiness of the specified aircraft models, detailing modifications, inspections, and operational limitations. The obligations imposed by the Airworthiness Directives 2004 on the relevant parties, primarily aircraft owners, operators, and maintenance personnel, are significant. They must comply with the newly re-made directives by implementing the specified modifications, inspections, and adhering to flight limitations as detailed in the directives (subsection 3(b)). This involves regular checks, necessary repairs, and adjustments to ensure that the aircraft meet the safety standards set by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) (subsection 3(b)). Failure to comply with these directives can result in the aircraft being deemed unairworthy, which could lead to grounding and further legal repercussions. The Airworthiness Directives 2004 outlines potential civil and criminal consequences for non-compliance with the specified directives. CASA has the authority to enforce these directives and may take action against individuals or entities that fail to comply. Civil penalties may include fines, and in severe cases, criminal charges could be brought against individuals responsible for the non-compliance, potentially leading to imprisonment (subsection 4). The exact penalties are not specified within the legislative instrument but are detailed in the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. It is essential for all stakeholders to understand and adhere to these directives to avoid any legal or safety repercussions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.